Blogs RSS Feed


Official honour for William Morris supporter

Photograph of the Author By Janet Wright »

Congratulations to Peter Cormack, who received an MBE in the New Year Honours list for his services to art and heritage. It’s a fitting reward for a man who has dedicated his working life to the service of Walthamstow, as keeper of the William Morris Gallery. And it’s pleasing that the government itself has recognized the value of his work.

William Morris must be Walthamstow’s most famous son: a nineteenth-century artist, socialist and author whose writings and designs are still best-sellers. The gallery, Morris’s former home, contains a unique collection of his work. Peter Cormack has a worldwide reputation as a Morris expert – and the gallery deserves no less.

What a shame, then, that Mr Cormack isn’t here to receive his award. He was forced out of his job last year. Once again, Waltham Forest managed to get rid of a priceless asset while pouring our money into useless schemes and promoting nonentities.

How did this happen? Two years ago, the council launched a “cultural cull”. The first broadside was aimed at the gallery. Its opening hours were slashed and expert staff told to go part-time or work elsewhere.

The borough’s head of museum and gallery warbled that she wanted this elegant Georgian house to be “a place where children can throw paint around”. (The council had quietly dropped plans to set up, elsewhere in Walthamstow, an art centre which would have been ideal for that.) Why should the people of Walthamstow have a magnificent treasure-house of irreplaceable art? At one extraordinary point, the borough’s priceless Morris collection was about to be offered to supporters of another nineteenth-century artist, to help them set up a gallery of their own!

A group called Antiscrap quickly formed to protect the gallery and spread the word beyond Waltham Forest. To the council’s amazement, its attack on the Morris gallery caused a worldwide protest. Although our town hall is decorated with quotes from Morris’s writings, the council seems to pride itself on knowing nothing about Walthamstow’s heritage. However, Morris -- as leader of the Arts & Crafts movement – has a global following. As the council had claimed the savage cuts were being made to save £56,000, his American supporters even offered to fund the gallery themselves.

The council’s refusal made it clear that this wasn’t really about saving money. And indeed, they have since been forced to spend more than that on patching up some of the mess made by the cuts. If it’s not about money, it can only be about hostility to Walthamstow and its unique heritage. You have to ask yourself why people who dislike the place so much bother to represent it. Well, maybe a £25,000-a-year councillor’s allowance helps.

It’s been an uphill struggle, but Antiscrap’s scrappy refusal to give up the fight seems to have scared the council off doing any more damage. Some of the gallery’s hours have been restored. And Peter Cormack’s MBE expresses what the rest of the world, if not Waltham Forest council, thinks of this borough’s most famous son.


Comments(10)

Sigi from Walthamstow says...
4:09pm Thu 8 Jan 09

What wonderful news! Congratulations to Peter Cormack

He is an expert on William Morris.

He was also very tuned into local history.

This council has deprived residents of Walthamstow of a treasure trove of knowledge and expertise when they sacked Peter Cormack.

Has the council done anything to promote the William Morris Gallery in the meantime?

Well, last year I suggested to Cllr Reardon to put up vinyl signs around Walthamstow Central Rail and Tube station, advertising the wonderful gallery.

One sign costs roughly around £200.
Two or three signs would do the job - thousands of commuters would see it!

But NOTHING has been done to promote the William Morris Gallery to local people or to Londoners.
And please don't forget - there will be Olympic visitors, too.

Instead this council has wasted our money on a big screen nobody wanted, and where the colours are so bright you can't watch it.

Cultural politics in Waltham Forest Council obviously mean a very big telly.
-Even if it doesn't work properly.

Touchwood says...
2:39pm Mon 12 Jan 09

Much as this Borough is proud of it's connection with William Morris there is a great deal more heritage to this area than the Council is willing to admit. The first British motor car, the start of London buses and A.V. Roe's first flight are just a few of the many historic events that have occured within the Borough's boundaries. Unfortunately the powers that be are seriously blinkered as to celebrating such and would rather waste residents taxes on less important projects!!

Technomist says...
4:52pm Mon 12 Jan 09

I must take issue with one point in this otherwise good piece: the £25,000-a-year allowance quoted works out far more than that in some cases. £10,248 per year is the very basic allowance, while the people who are wrecking the place get by on much much more.

It is, of course, not clear who is getting exactly what (there are other things they claim for and further perks that go with being a councillor), but in December 2008, The Evening Standard published a list which indicated the 59 councillors in Waltham Forest were taking, and divying up between them, allowances amounting to some £1,051,773.

The priority (if that is the right word for the intellectually incoherent managerial nonsense which seems to 'drive' this council) is still on social engineering. It is led from the top by cut-off, culturally impoverished mediocrities promoting bland platitudes.

They wreck the borough and jargonise, sloganise and flounder in the implementation of their unworkable ideological views. It is so sad they are unable to reflect, celebrate and nurture the fascinating, rich and historic urban culture we actually have before our very eyes, of which William Morris's legacy is only one part.

Janet1 says...
9:00pm Mon 12 Jan 09

Technomist, you're right: I used £25,000 a year as a round number.

The 29 members of Waltham Forest council who are on committees actually get more than £26,000 a year each in allowances. Biggest winner is the council leader, Clyde Loakes, who gets a cool £50,000. Incidentally, that's double the average wage in this borough.

The other 31 councillors, who have no special duties, get a basic £10,000. Some of these are real idealists who work hard for their electorates. But they all get that money whether or not they are even seen in their ward between one photo-opportunity and the next.

What really annoys me is that our councillors voted themselves these huge payments -- a breath-taking increase of nearly 30% on their previous, average-sized allowances -- at the same meeting in late 2007 where they launched the Cultural Cull.

While voting to increase their own allowances by a total of £230,000 a year, they also voted to close St James Street Library (saving £70,000 a year), slash opening hours and expert staffing at the William Morris Gallery and Vestry House Museum (£56,000), cut funding for classes and everything else that has hit us so hard over the past two years.

The £230,000-a-year for this massive and undeserved pay rise could have kept St James Street Library open, prevented any cuts at the msueum and gallery, funded all the axed classes and probably saved the theatre too. (The council always come up with ludicrously inflated figures for anything they don't want to fund: I'm using the real costs from council budgets.)

And even that might be bearable if they were anything other than endlessly, dispiritingly, relentlessly rubbish at everything except legally stuffing their own pockets and building their own careers.

Janet1 says...
9:04pm Mon 12 Jan 09

Sigi, a very god point. The council has endless money to spend on pointless gestures that no one has asked for. But it won't spend small sums on advertising or promoting the borough's real treasures.
And Touchwood, also true. I consider this the "Wonders of Walthamstow" blog, and that's what I try to cover. See www.guardian-series.
co.uk/blogs/profile/
29336

Despite everything the council has done to drag it down, Walthamstow still has so much, stemming from its rich history and the talent, artistry and endeavours of people who live here now and love it.

Touchwood says...
6:38am Tue 13 Jan 09

What I fail to understand is that although I read, and hear, again and again that the residents are totally dissatisfied with this Council's performance record, they still seem to vote the same people into power at the local Elections! Surely when they see the sums these people have voted themselves they should realise that they are being blatantly fleeced and change their voting policy!!

Janet1 says...
10:56pm Tue 13 Jan 09

One of the few things this council does efficiently is to produce a fortnightly paper called wfm, that's delivered to every household in the borough. It's so packed with party propaganda that it's known locally as Pravda, after the Soviet paper.

Its fantasy view of life in wonderful Waltham Forest has to affect people who haven't done any research into reality -- especially if they don't buy other local papers or follow the real news online.

Pravda doesn't contain the sort of information you'd expect in a council newsletter, eg telling residents their local library is going to close. No-- users of St James Street Library were pushing their books through the letterbox for weeks after their library was closed down without warning. But there are plenty of photos of beaming councillors pretending to be useful.

And this party-political propaganda is all paid for out of our council tax!

sensibility says...
9:40pm Thu 15 Jan 09

Waltham Forest is extremely good at getting rid of its assets.

This man was an extremely hard worker and didnt deserve the treatment he got.

They have sold off our town halls
apart from Walthamstow Town Hall

They are selling off our heritage and what belongs to the people of waltham forest all the time but no one does anything about it

I am so please his work was recognised

Curmudgeonly says...
3:28pm Sat 17 Jan 09

To be honest, Janet, the council's loathesome jingoism and trumpet blowing is really no different from your own blog's particular brand of propaganda. It's all equally boring and self-serving.

Janet1 says...
12:01am Mon 19 Jan 09

That's an interesting outlook, Curmudgeonly. Waltham Forest council pours millions of pounds a year of taxpayers' money into all kinds of strange schemes that produce no results, plus its own lavish pay rises. Self-serving, certainly.

Campaigners trying to protect Walthamstow's suriving heritage use their own time and money. There's no individual benefit for any of us and I suspect we'd all much prefer to have the time off -- to catch up on sleep if nothing else. In what way is that self-serving?

As for propaganda, if you can find one sentence I've written that isn't true I'll be glad to correct it.


Bloggers

Recent blog entries

February 2012 »
S M T W T F S
30 31 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 01 02 03 04

RSS