Community blogs RSS Feed


Councillors, is it worth risking your seat?

Photograph of the Author By Janet Wright »

Waltham Forest councillors, be warned: selling off St James Street Library could cost you your seat. More than 2,000 people signed a petition to get the library reopened, while no councillor in Waltham Forest got more than 1500 votes in the last election. And with a group of independents now looking at standing in next year’s elections, voters at last will have a real choice.

The council’s Labour group tried last month to force St James Street Library onto a list of buildings for sale. Campaigners fear they may seize another next chance at Tuesday’s cabinet meeting [6 October].

“This is crunch time,” says St James Street Library Campaign, which was formed after the council closed the library without warning in 2007. As a member of the campaign, I know that local residents want our library reopened. And a sale at today’s low property prices will short-change all the borough’s council-tax payers.

Last month, Cllr John Macklin was due to present the cabinet – the 10 councillors who decide policy -- with a list of buildings that could be sold. St James Street library did not appear on the list. Before the meeting, all the Labour cabinet members tried to force through an amendment adding St James Street library to the list. Cllr Macklin refused, and withdrew the report. But it was only deferred to the 6 October meeting, so will we see another attempt then?

St James Street Library Campaign is calling for the building, in Coppermill Lane, to be returned to community use. It was the only community facility in a large area, and people want it back. We have offered many times to work with the council on reopening the library for community use, and are still willing to do so.

Councillors have no right to dispose of the borough’s assets when prices are so low. They can’t pretend they urgently need money for services – they voted themselves a £210,000 pay rise when they closed our library in 2007, and that’s three times more than the library cost to run. The council should not even be considering sales that will only benefit the developers who buy our prime sites.

So wherever you live in Waltham Forest, don’t feel helpless in the face of this council’s endless attacks on Walthamstow. Ask your councillor for a definite commitment, now, to reopening St James Street and restoring the sadly depleted book stocks at the borough’s other libraries.

Don’t accept any waffle about looking into it after the election. They don’t need your vote after the election!


Comments(5)

Techno2 says...
7:31pm Thu 1 Oct 09

Do you know who the councillors in Markhouse ward are and what their positions on this are?

I understand that Councillor Ali seems to have given up on getting himself or his colleagues in Labour re-elected in HIgh Street - he was among those Labour councillors trying to put the library onto the list for it to be flogged off. (There is a comment about this on Cllr O'Rourkes' website, for those who are interested.)



Walthamster says...
12:31am Fri 2 Oct 09

Thanks for this news, Techno. Liaquat Ali solidly ignored the library campaign despite all his constituents' pleas, until an angry group of Muslim voters took exception to its being turned into a drug centre earlier this year. Then he suddenly appeared in front of the library (and the press cameras) opposing the scheme! Now the cameras have gone, he's back to his previous anti-library position.

Oh I must be fair - he had once amazed everyone by responding to a letter sent by a group of Muslim library-supporters. Or at least a supportive letter was sent from the council with his signature at the bottom of it.

None of us had had a response from Ali before, though he's supposed to be our local Labour representative.
But we're nice people, so we immediately forgave him.

Then one of our members ran into him a couple of weeks later in the market and started talking to him about the library campaign. Ali seemed baffled - as if he hadn't a clue what she was talking about!

The Markhouse councillors are Asghar, Broadley and Mahmood. As they're all Labour, I presume they take the council's anti-library line.

In this large deprived area, not one Labour councillor has, to my knowledge, spoken a word for public libraries, the traditional working-class route to education and a better life. That is sad beyond belief.

chrisbo says...
11:55am Mon 12 Oct 09

I moved to Walthamstow at the end of 2007 after living in South London for 7 years. Prior to that, I was in E17 for five years. This is the only borough I am aware of in London that regressed, not progressed, over one of the most prosperous times the city has ever seen. I am genuinely shocked at the utter useless-ness and apathy of the local council - who keeps these morons in office? I am a financial journalist for a large news large organisation and would be interested if anyone has stories to tell about the dreadful mis-management of a borough which has so much missed potential.

Touchwood says...
11:24pm Sat 17 Oct 09

The definition of local councillors - a bunch of thieving toerags!!

Janet1 says...
10:48am Sun 18 Oct 09

Chrisbo, sorry I've only just seen your comment. Please contact me: j@freelance-journali
st.co.uk.

There's plenty to tell, and I can also put you in touch with local activists who have already done a lot of research into various scandals.


Bloggers

Recent blog entries

May 2012 »
S M T W T F S
29 30 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

RSS