News RSS Feed


ONGAR: Villagers unite against homes plan

9:07am Friday 4th July 2008

comment Comments (11)   Have your say »

By James Colasanti »

A COMMUNITY is united in its opposition to a large housing development in their village.

Residents, councillors and railway enthusiasts have all voiced objections to the development of 52 homes on former railway land at Station Approach in Ongar.

Outline planning permission has already been granted for the David Wilson Homes project which would consist of 39 two and three storey houses and flats, and a three-storey mother-and-baby unit with 13 self-contained apartments and support facilities for young parents.

The unit's flats will have a communal kitchen, lounge and play area, and would cater predominantly for single mothers, from the Epping Forest, Brentwood, Uttlesford and surrounding areas.

Ongar Town Council met last Thursday (June 26) to consider the plans, and raised several concerns for the district council's planning committee to consider.

Councillors said the height of the three-storey building would be "out-of-character and proportion with the surrounding environment" and said the increase in traffic would "add to the already busy High Street to the detriment of road safety".

Members were also concerned by "inadequate infrastructure" and said health services and shopping facilities in the area were already overloaded.

They also said they felt it might have an adverse effect on wildlife at the site and they urged the district council to give local residents more time to raise concerns and ask questions about the scheme.

John Glover, chairman of the Ongar Railway Preservation Society, has long campaigned against the project, arguing it would scupper plans to reinstate a commuter railway service.

Mr Glover, of Toot Hill, Ongar, said: "We are glad to see the town council has raised objections which are in keeping with the feeling in our community which believes this is a development will have no benefit for local residents.

"We have always said this area should be for railway use. We know that is what people in the village want."

Dennis Mortimer, of Bowes Drive, Ongar, is one of many villagers concerned about the development.

He said: "They are building houses but not providing enough facilities for people living in the area.

"The school is fully subscribed and you cannot get on the books at doctors' surgeries."

Brian Hatch, of Love Lane, Ongar, called it a "step backwards for the town", and said he felt the project was aimed at tackling the problems of residents from outside the village.

A spokesman for Epping Forest District Council said it would be inappropriate to comment before the application goes before the planning committee.

The district council is expected to make a final decision about the project by the end of July.

A spokesman for David Wilson Homes said management at the company were unavailable for comment


Your Say Your Guardian

Barry Waller, Chipping Ongar says...
11:05am Fri 4 Jul 08

"Villagers unite against homes plan" - ONGAR ISN'T A VILLAGE! IT'S A MARKET TOWN LIKE EPPING!!!!

PLEASE GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT.

Simon Weekes-Hughes, Epping, Essex says...
11:09am Fri 4 Jul 08

I don't like to correct people but Epping Forest Guardian you have reported this wrong, Chipping Ongar is a Market Town. High Ongar is a village.

Janet Richards, Harlow says...
11:24am Fri 4 Jul 08

I used to live in Chipping Ongar back in the 1970s & 1980s and am genuinely suprised how stuck up the current residents are.

In my day we never referred to Chipping Ongar as a "village", as it isn't one. It would seem they don't want the housing to go ahead as it is for "young mothers", its pure NIMBYism!

Lets face it the Underground isn't coming back and even if it did they wouldn't need that land as its the old Goods Yard from the steam era. So that's a rubbsih excuse, also if they wanted the Underground so badly why didn't they use it back in the 70s & 80s? Everyone used to use Brentwood station!

Observer, says...
11:34am Fri 4 Jul 08

It will create nothing but huge problems if a group of social inadequates living in what amounts to hostel accommodation is dumped in an area that is almost totally bereft of reasonable transport commections with the outside world. If EFDC is so keen on providing for people from thier own area and Brentwood and Uttlesford then at least choose somewhere with reasonable access - Loughton, Buckhurst Hill, Chigwell "village" all served by buses and the Underground.

Peter Freeman, says...
11:36am Fri 4 Jul 08

"out-of-character and proportion with the surrounding environment"

What about that massive Higgins estate on the roundabout? Sadly Ongar lost its charm along time ago. Since the late 1980s it has been ruined by 'new build' estates with the Higgins one doing the most damage.

The High Street is now dead and so are the pubs, is there anything really left to save?

Observer, says...
11:36am Fri 4 Jul 08

Apologies for the typos - "connections" and "their".

Dean Smith, Loughton says...
4:53pm Fri 4 Jul 08

Since when has the market town of Chipping Ongar been a "village"? pretentious t***s!

The plans make good use of derelict land, they should stop pretending they live in a village and also stop being NIMBYs.

Gemma Cohen, High Ongar says...
5:00pm Fri 4 Jul 08

The last time the land in question was used was when the line was owned by British Rail. London Underground never used the land, so it has been unused since around 1957.

These plans make use of a peace of land that hasn't be touched in around 50 years. Stop being NIMBYs and lets use this land in a positive way. The plans have my full support.

Paul Klerk, London says...
6:46pm Fri 4 Jul 08

"They also said they felt it might have an adverse effect on wildlife at the site"

Now I know this site very well, I was born in ongar and left in 1992 when I moved to London. This site is only home to rabbits, some grass snakes and the odd passing pheasant. All animals could be easily moved to near by land, although the rabbits are a major nuisance to the neighbouring farms, so wouldn't be missed.

As for this land London Underground never used it, the only time I ever saw it used was when London Underground carried out pest control on it (shooting the rabbits). So why not make good use of the land? Who wants to look at wasteland?

Carley Maple, Essex says...
6:55pm Fri 4 Jul 08

"Brian Hatch, of Love Lane, Ongar, called it a "step backwards for the town", and said he felt the project was aimed at tackling the problems of residents from outside the village."

So even the residents seem to be confused. Just to clarify Chipping Ongar (which this article is about) is a market town not a village!

David Bassit, says...
2:02pm Sat 5 Jul 08

You read about this situation regularly in the local paper, as developers are looking to build on any free space in the South East. Although normally when people or groups object to plans, they normally give a clear and sound set of reasons to why they are objecting.

In this case though, the only reasons that seem to be given for objecting this are:

1. Blind hope that TfL will buy back a redundant line that they sold 14 yrs old, and that if they were to re-purchase it, they would need the land to run a commuter service (which isn't true, as others have stated when the line was open LU didn’t use the land).

2. This belief that the development would be out of place, this isn't true as neighbouring the land is a modern old peoples home, and modern housing and in the town as a whole there are many new estates. So, rightly or wrongly such a development wouldn’t be out of place.

3. A campaign of misinformation by the residents to make out Ongar is a village, and that it is a rural one that any new development would be detrimental and unsustainable. This again is false, as Ongar is a town and has seen numerous developments since the 1980s. Which has helped to erode any history or charm the town once had, and in turn made it a place were modern developments are right a home.

4. Detrimental effect on wildlife, well this one is open and shut case. The land has a fresh water stream around it, which means grass snakes enter the land via this; they of course would just go down the stream to the next peace of land. Rabbits, a major problem for the farmers and a pest and there are many other places rabbits live in Ongar. Passing birds, well they would just fly to the next bit of land. There are no protected species living or breeding on the land.

From this I come to the conclusion that there are no real grounds to object to these plans other then NIMBYism, which to-date NIMBYism isn’t a ground for objection.

Your sayYour Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE East London and West Essex Guardian Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
John Glover at the site of the proposed housing project John Glover at the site of the proposed housing project

Sponsored Links


E-editions


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »