Charity accuses Waltham Forest Council of failing to protect residents from hardship following council tax reforms

Council summoned 3, 255 residents in 7 months over non-payment of 8.5% council tax

Council summoned 3, 255 residents in 7 months over non-payment of 8.5% council tax

First published in News
Last updated
East London and West Essex Guardian Series: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter - Waltham Forest

A charity has criticised Waltham Forest Council for not doing enough to protect vulnerable people affected by council tax benefit changes.

Coalition government welfare reforms mean claimants can no longer receive 100 per cent council tax benefit. 

Waltham Forest Council set the rate that claimants must pay at 8.5 per cent, which will rise to 15 per cent on April 1.

In an attempt to minimise the impact, the council introduced the Council Tax Exceptional Hardship Relief Scheme and set aside a budget in 2013/14 of £150,000.

The objective of the scheme is “to support local people experiencing exceptional hardship and who are unable to pay their council tax.”

But according to details released under the Freedom of Information Act, as of March 4 none of the money set aside had been used, despite the council receiving 14 applications.

The information released to the Guardian by anti-poverty charity Z2K also shows between April and December last year, 3,255 residents were summoned to court for non-payment of council tax. 

Joanna Kennedy, chief executive of Z2K, said: "We are disappointed that Waltham Forest has chosen to increase this tax on their poorest residents.

"Thousands of people in Waltham Forest struggling to pay have already received court summons and had £120 costs added to their debt, this number will only increase with the higher payment.

"At the same time the council has failed to award a single penny of the exceptional hardship scheme allocated to support these residents". 

Councillor Mark Rusling, cabinet member for economic development and corporate resources, said the council had no choice but to introduce a 15 per cent council tax scheme as a result of the government's 'cost-shunting exercise', and none of the hardship fund applicants immediately qualified for support.

He added: "The council’s scheme was set at 15% and it is wrong to suggest the percentage has been increased as we were able to reduce the percentage to 8.5% for the first year partly because of some one-off funding and also because of resources from changes to council tax discounts. 

"The only way we could implement a 0% rise in this borough would be to plug an annual funding gap of £3m and that would only be possible if we were to divert money away from other services such as schools, social care and libraries year after year. We are simply not prepared to do that.

"Of the 13 applications made to the hardship fund that have been assessed, none immediately qualified for support, largely because the relevant proof of income and expenditure was not supplied.

"Despite requesting this information, none of the claimants subsequently provided the necessary proof and interestingly nine of them have since paid their Council Tax contributions in full, with three more paying by instalments." 

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:16pm Thu 27 Mar 14

Ollie J says...

The question must also be asked: "Why has the council only received 14 applications for relief?". There are definitely more than 14 people in the borough experiencing hardship.

I suspect it's because the council is failing to ensure the scheme is properly publicised.
The question must also be asked: "Why has the council only received 14 applications for relief?". There are definitely more than 14 people in the borough experiencing hardship. I suspect it's because the council is failing to ensure the scheme is properly publicised. Ollie J
  • Score: 10

6:56pm Thu 27 Mar 14

Villagecranberry says...

The vulnerable are such that they are so removed from society that they are very most likely completely oblivious that such a scheme exists or too drunk or drugged up to care when their main concern is where to get their next fix.

No doubt though there exists a team of interpreters and 'support workers' specifically there to assist asylum seekers and people who no speak the English or cannot be bothered to learn it after 30 years or more in the UK.
The vulnerable are such that they are so removed from society that they are very most likely completely oblivious that such a scheme exists or too drunk or drugged up to care when their main concern is where to get their next fix. No doubt though there exists a team of interpreters and 'support workers' specifically there to assist asylum seekers and people who no speak the English or cannot be bothered to learn it after 30 years or more in the UK. Villagecranberry
  • Score: 0

7:19pm Thu 27 Mar 14

stickmanny says...

You're vulnerable.
You're vulnerable. stickmanny
  • Score: 1

8:49am Fri 28 Mar 14

stiltsy says...

Is this a typo?

"...between April and December last year, 255 residents were summoned to court for non-payment of council tax..."

Shouldn't the figure be 3,255?
Is this a typo? "...between April and December last year, 255 residents were summoned to court for non-payment of council tax..." Shouldn't the figure be 3,255? stiltsy
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree