A legal dispute over the Doctor Johnson in Barkingside has led to it being left empty

Nabil Ahmed, Marco Juno, Radek Wieckowski and Gee in the pub.

Nabil Ahmed, Marco Juno, Radek Wieckowski and Gee in the pub.

First published in News
Last updated
East London and West Essex Guardian Series: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

A derelict grade II listed pub has been left empty for three years due to a legal dispute between the building’s owner and its tenants, it has emerged.

Campaigning squatters moved into the Doctor Johnson pub in Longwood Gardens, Barkingside, ten days ago in an attempt to negotiate re-opening the building for community use.

The Guardian has learned the building is owned by Cloverton Properties based in Colchester, which is currently in dispute with tenant Spirit Pub Company.

A spokesman for Spirit said the dispute was “long-running” but did not clarify the nature of the dispute.

He also claimed the company was not currently the responsibility of the company.

The squatters, who are members of group Suspenses Property Guardians, have been in contact with the landlord and are hopeful a deal can be struck.

Spokesman ‘Gee’, 41, said: “The landlord is on board with it, we just need Spirit Pub Company to give us the go ahead too.

“If we didn’t take action nothing would be done and this legal dispute will drag on. The only solution is that we fund the work ourselves. We are offering a way out to these two disputing parties.

“I understand it is a nightmare situation for the landlord and the company who don’t want to spend any money, but all we need is word they are behind our plans and we can fund it ourselves.

“A community centre would bring people to the area, which would really benefit local businesses and bring a massive upturn in the local economy.”

The squatters have now left the pub and will continue negotiations.

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:38pm Mon 9 Jun 14

terrycollmann says...

"He also claimed the company was not currently the responsibility of the company."

Do you employ sub-editors?
"He also claimed the company was not currently the responsibility of the company." Do you employ sub-editors? terrycollmann
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree