Public planning meetings officially scrapped by Redbridge council

East London and West Essex Guardian Series: Planning committees have been abolished. Planning committees have been abolished.

Councillors will no longer decide on planning applications, with the new leadership of Redbridge council insisting they are not qualified to do the job.

All decisions will be made by planning officials, under the measure approved at a town hall meeting last night.

It is hoped the new arrangement will save the council £45,000 a year.

Council leader, Jas Athwal, claimed councillors are not qualified to make planning decisions.

He added: “These planning officers have a huge amount of education and it seems egotistic that councillors can overrule them, I don’t think they add anything to the process.

“We will review it in six months but this move provides more savings for the council for getting rid of an outdated system."

Concerns have been raised about accountability being undermined.

And some believe planning officials' workloads will be unworkable.

Councillors opposed to the move, set to save about £45,000, believe that the system is not workable due to the sheer amount of cases the officers would have to decide on.

Conservative group leader Cllr Paul Canal said: "There were 339 applications last year and this would mean that officers will have to decide on 34 applications a night.

"They will struggle to get through all these and it would no doubt lead to applications being rushed through and objectors not having time to have their say."

Lib Dem Cllr Hugh Cleaver said: “Local councillors have a better view of issues in their area, so I totally reject the notion that planning officers are more qualified to make decisions.

"People want an opportunity to discuss their planning applications and speak it through, but they will now only be able to send in a written submission, they will not be happy to say the least."

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:10am Fri 18 Jul 14

ruby newbie says...

oh no we are all doomed
oh no we are all doomed ruby newbie
  • Score: 0

11:59am Fri 18 Jul 14

mdj says...

If Cllr Athwal does not believe in democratic scrutiny, why does he simply not delegate all his own functions to the salaried Chief Executive and resign, thereby saving more than the £45k than this measure claims to do?

The purpose of scrutiny of executive decisions by elected members of the public is to inject common sense, take note of public taste and opinion, and most importantly of all, to keep a check on corruption, which thrives in the absence of scrutiny.
He must know this; if not, he is in the wrong job.


Like the jury, it is by no means a perfect system, but better than any of the alternatives on offer currently.

Did Labour's manifesto for the election say,'Vote for us, and we'll abolish democracy?'
If Cllr Athwal does not believe in democratic scrutiny, why does he simply not delegate all his own functions to the salaried Chief Executive and resign, thereby saving more than the £45k than this measure claims to do? The purpose of scrutiny of executive decisions by elected members of the public is to inject common sense, take note of public taste and opinion, and most importantly of all, to keep a check on corruption, which thrives in the absence of scrutiny. He must know this; if not, he is in the wrong job. Like the jury, it is by no means a perfect system, but better than any of the alternatives on offer currently. Did Labour's manifesto for the election say,'Vote for us, and we'll abolish democracy?' mdj
  • Score: 5

4:50pm Sun 20 Jul 14

MorrisHickey says...

Goodbye democracy, hello salaried dictatorship.
Goodbye democracy, hello salaried dictatorship. MorrisHickey
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree