News RSS Feed


WALTHAMSTOW: Council ‘failed’ to do a disability test

9:40am Sunday 20th January 2008

comment Comments (11)   Have your say »


A STUDY aimed at improving equality between disabled and able bodied people was not carried out by the council, contrary to law.

All local authorities have to carry out a disability impact assessment under the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) before making major decisions.

But Waltham Forest Council admitted none was undertaken before St James St Library, Walthamstow, was closed, despite it having one of the few disabled toilets in Walthamstow.

Reader Pearl Small, 80, of Glenthorne Road, cannot walk without sticks or her specially adapted shopping trolley.

She said: "The closure affected me in many other ways too. It was round the corner from where I lived and I could put the big large print books I need into my trolley."

She said she did not want to bring the trolley to Walthamstow Central because she was scared criminals would see her as vulnerable, and attack her.

Deputy director of charity Waltham Forest Disability Action, Alan Carlton, said concern had been expressed by its users about the closure.

But the cabinet member for libraries, Cllr Geraldine Reardon, said the borough was "absolutely dedicated" to providing modern accessible facilities. The St James Street Library was the most poorly used of the authority's libraries. It was not compliant with the Disability Discrimination Act and indications were that to make it DDA compliant would cost a disproportionate amount of money.

A spokeswoman from the Government's Equalities and Human Right Commission said it would write to the council to clarify the situation.


Your Say YourEast London and West Essex Guardian Series

Morris Hikey, Chigwell says...
11:55am Sun 20 Jan 08

Waltham Forest Council fails - and that's considered to be news???

Mr. T. C. Hull, says...
8:12am Mon 21 Jan 08

Again the Council has shown how completely useless it is!!

Book-lover, Walthamstow says...
2:08pm Mon 21 Jan 08

St James Street Library had the only disabled-access toilet at that end of the High Street. Closing it meant just one more reduction in quality of life for older and disabled people, in an area that already had few amenities.

A community facility such as a library should not be closed if it doesn't quite meet the Disability Discrimination Act's requirements. It is meant to improve facilities, not be used as a weak excuse for withdrawing them. The law is very clear about this.


Walthamster, E17 says...
2:14pm Mon 21 Jan 08

The "disproportionate" cost of giving St James St full disabled access was just £30,000, according to an assessment the council did a few years ago. That was a one-off cost, on top of the £70,000 a year running cost.

Instead the councillors voted to close the library and give themselves a £230,000 pay rise.

There is now no disabled loo, and no library, for people who can't make it to the other end of the High Street.

How exactly does this translate into "absolute dedication"?

The council leader isn't a book reader., E17 says...
3:08pm Mon 21 Jan 08

Shame on Waltham Forest council for closing a much needed library.

Council leader, are you listening?

If you or any of the other councillors are serious about listening to local people, here's a challange for you:

Why don't you just ASK local people if they want their library back?

Go on, it's called democracy.

Why don't you try it sometime?

Libby, E17 says...
4:02pm Mon 21 Jan 08

The council has not considered the needs of the local residents before closing St James library. If they did care for the people, all these problems would never have arose - hardship for children, young families and senior citizens, plus nurseries. When are the Councillors going to wake up? They were put in that position of trust and good faith because of the people who believe in them. Our vote matters so wake up! Any councillors willing to repent and change the bad situation caused by the lack of consulting the people before closure? You will have our votes in the future. Remember people's power is vital and our faith will be restored if councillors are willing to stand up for the people and re-vote to put back St James library to our community. You will be the hero(s) of our community. Let the heroic councillors take this challenge and vote positively. Any response for a brave councillor?

Sick of it, Walthamstow says...
6:01pm Mon 21 Jan 08

This council's shabby efforts to defend its dirty tricks get more pathetic every day. It really has stopped being funny. The greed, the total disregard for anyone's welfare, the trampling over rules that are meant to protect people, the readiness to destroy anything, the meaningless platitudes about the borough being "absolutely dedicated to providing modern accessible facilities".
Do they even care if no one believes a word of it any more? They're still pocketing their £25,000-plus "allowances" that could pay for the things they're closing.

chuck them out, Waltham Forest says...
6:36pm Mon 21 Jan 08

Don't get depressed. Councillors rely on us to elect them, and pay their fat allowances. Join one of the many groups that are organising to defend our services, eg through http://www.keepourmu

seumsopen.org.uk/ or http://stjamesstlibr

ary.wordpress.com

Things are very different now from 2006 when this lot were voted in. By the end of 2006 they had voted for that famous £230,000 increase in their own allowances and for the crippling cuts to services that have aroused so much opposition.

They knew they were hurting the people of this borough, but they thought we were too weak to fight back.

Why did they do it? Because they thought they'd get away with it. They weren't expecting the amount of opposition they've aroused, or the depth of feeling, or people's refusal to give up and go away. You can see how they're blundering along like lost robots now, repeating meaningless phrases about "dedication" because they can't answer the simple questions put to them.

When they come up for re-election in 2010, don't believe their new set of empty promises. Remember that every member of the Labour/Lib Dem coalition voted for all those cuts.

Anyone who cares about their community and is prepared to do a bit of work, stand as an independent, a Green or one of the other groups that haven't disgraced themselves. You'll be amazed how much support you're likely to get!

Respect Society, Walthamstow says...
10:53pm Mon 21 Jan 08

My heart goes out to the disabled and elderly. They do to central library less due to the stress they faced with their handicap. These councillors have no respect for them. Their attitudes and responses are really disgusting and beyond belief. They are living in their "ivory castles" thinking that they are untouchable with the campaigns going around them. Just you wait, Messrs Councillors!

mdj, e10 says...
12:48am Tue 22 Jan 08

Today local people handed in the 11,000- name petition against cuts at the William Morris Gallery to No 10 Downing St. The BBC covered it on the lunchtime news, and other press will follow shortly. This campaign against Council shoddiness, self-serving and lies is not going to fade away.
Contact info@antiscrap.co.uk if you want to be kept up with events, or can contribute information or help.

Bookworm, Walthamstow says...
10:40am Sat 26 Jan 08

For me the beauty of visiting a library is rummaging in it and letting books speak to me before choosing any of them for reading at home, and my heart goes out to those who've been deprived of this exquisite pleasure by the closure of St James St Library. The council has mentioned before that there is a mobile library service available to disabled people but that does not provide the same opportunity for that precious lengthy rumminging among books and dipping in and out of them before finally making our choice of which ones to take out, does it?

I think the closure of St James St Library and the waste of money on so-called refurbishments of libraries is absolutely criminal. What's needed is MORE small libraries dotted across the borough, not less!

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »