News RSS Feed


WALTHAM FOREST: Poor fund cash spent on Olympics projects


MONEY which was supposed to help people in the most deprived areas of Waltham Forest was spent on the council’s Olympics activities, despite previous apparent assurances to the contrary.

A damning report by consultants Pricewaterhousecoopers (PWC) into the Better Neighbourhood Initiative (BNI) found papers relating to ‘many projects’ in a disorganised file labelled ‘Olympics’.

As an example of the chaos which characterised the administration of millions of pounds under BNI and its predecessor the Neighbourhood Renewal Fund (NRF), the Olympic ‘Youth Ambassadors’ project was described as “extremely difficult to review”.

Papers were relating to the scheme were not clearly categorised and monitoring forms vaguely referred to the Olympics ‘in general’.

This made it ‘impossible’ to assess how the money was spent and how successful projects were.

The council has previously denied any BNI money was spent on supporting the borough’s 2012 team.

The PWC investigation found 78 per cent of all projects under BNI had “no logically structured files”.

It listed a catalogue of failings to monitor spending and follow basic rules to prevent fraud.

investigators were unable to locate signed contracts for half of projects and files were littered with inaccuracies and inconsistencies.

The “vast majority” of project files showed no evidence of appropriate tendering.

Of the 55 contracts inspected, none contained any evidence of review or approval by the legal department.

A council spokeman said: "The borough’s Olympics strategy has, at its core, an aim to use the opportunities presented by the 2012 Games to secure work and training for local people.

"To this end, BNI money was allocated to setting up the Worknet programme: a partnership initiative designed to match unemployed and unskilled residents with training and employment opportunities.

"Owing to an underspend in the original BNI staffing budget, a further £12,500 was spent on the Olympic Hoops for Health Primary School project.

"Although delivered to primary schools across the borough, priority was given to schools in or by BNI priority neighbourhoods."

Five council officers are currently under investigation for not reporting alleged fraud by EduAction, the company which used to run education in the borough.

Whistleblowers claim the company used £240,000 it was paid through NRF to boost profits.

The findings of the council’s investigation into EduAction’s role in the affair was blocked by the company’s lawyers last month.

The authority has now handed its evidence to the police, who have confirmed they will carry out a ‘full and thorough” review of the investigation.

It has also emerged that EduAction was given about £1 million by the council through BNI without contracts being signed and procedures to prevent fraud being followed.


Your Say Your Guardian

Chris15, Essex says...
6:34pm Tue 19 Aug 08

The wriggle-room gets smaller and smaller for those in LBWF who say that everything has been done by the rules. At the very least people at the top have been caught out allowing carte blanche access to public funds.
I wish I had some hoops for them to jump through

Walthamster, Walthamstow says...
10:54pm Tue 19 Aug 08

This would be beyond belief in most councils; sadly, not so in Waltham Forest.
For years, senior officers and councillors have acted as if they were above the law. They truly believed that if they ignored queries, protests and complaints people would give up in the end.
All hail Nick Tiratsoo, the man who wouldn't give up! Seeing these results, I suspect a lot of people will now feel it's worth standing up for justice again.

Technomist, Walthamstow says...
9:27am Wed 20 Aug 08

There has been a massive betrayal of trust. I look forward to some arrests, but at the very least there should be a rigorous round of sackings - without pay-offs.

NT, London says...
9:35am Wed 20 Aug 08

I dont know what the Council press office was asked, but the statement reproduced in this story is unhelpful, and that is being polite.

As is correctly reported, the PWC report clearly refers to 'many projects', way beyond anything to do with Worknet.

Moreover, documents submitted to the Council's Scrutiny Committee - http://www1.walthamf
orest.gov.uk/moderng
ov/Published/C000003
92/M00001568/AI00007
611/$6iBNIStrategyAp
pendix1.docA.ps.pdf (see pp.14-15)- show that £548000 was set aside from the BNI budget 2006-08 to pay for the upkeep of the LBWF 2012 team.

And there is absolutely no evidence, by the way, that the team's activities were (or are) especially targetted at poorer wards.

With a colleague,I complained about the fact that the BNI budget was being used to prop up the 2012 team in an open letter to councillors last year.

Councillor Loakes replied:'it is not true to say that the Better Neighbourhoods Initiative is supporting…the Council’s Olympic Team’.

Thec rest (with one honourable exception)remained silent.

Technomist, Walthamstow says...
10:26am Wed 20 Aug 08

NT, I am sorry that you are disappointed to have been lied to by Councillor Loakes. Please do not be upset or let you be off-put in your personal and public spirited quest to know more about the Great man.

We who are not worthy to know the entirety of what goes on in the Helmman's Olympian Mind, nor indeed, to do anything but admire and wonder at the workings of his marvellous principles of Socialist Accountancy, will only have to await the final triumph of his destiny to see where this is leading. I myself, can only now await his immortal appearance before the dock of historical opinion where all will be explained, with all the humility of a lowly insect.

In the meantime, I expect that our Dear Leader had some higher justification for this dishonesty we simply cannot comprehend. On the Great Day when all is revealed and our Paradise of a Borough reaches the sunny uplands of cost-effective, righteous and harmonious local government he is leading us towards, He will make us all see what a great visionary he is. In our euphoria we will all joyously find ourselves in our rightful places, kow-towing as an insignificant part of the greater masses; bowing in humble homage to his superior legal brain on the grass near the Magistrates Court beside the Town Hall (others will have got up at dawn to deny us a place nearer to the balcony scene of his final triumph).


Walthamster, Walthamstow says...
12:11pm Wed 20 Aug 08

The documents mentioned by NT, and submitted to the Council's Scrutiny Committee, show that £548000 was set aside from the BNI budget 2006-08 to pay for the upkeep of the LBWF 2012 team.

But Clyde Loakes has said "it is not true to say that the Better Neighbourhoods Initiative is supporting…the Council’s Olympic Team."

Clyde Loakes is both leader of Waltham Forest council and chairman of the Local Strategic Partnership (LSP), which is the accountable body for BNI. No one is better placed to know what's happening, so he can't have said that in ignorance.

Will the Guardian please ask Mr Loakes how he justifies making a statement that has now been proved false?

And what is the scrutiny committee doing? If it is (as I suspect) doing nothing, how does it justify its esxistence?

NT, London says...
2:46pm Wed 20 Aug 08

I sent this letter to Councillor Loakes on 18/08 and await a reply.
NT

Dear Mr Loakes,
Some months ago, ... and I raised with you our anxiety that the BNI budget was being used to pay for the LBWF Olympic Team’s activities.
You replied unequivocally: ‘it is not true to say that the Better Neighbourhoods Initiative is supporting…the Council’s Olympic Team’.
I am aware that the LBWF press office has taken the same line with at least two national media organisations.
As you may know, LBWF recently charged PWC with assessing all BNI projects, and its findings (Internal Audit Report: Better Neighbourhoods Initiative review – Final Report) was presented to Cabinet on 22 July 2008.
In this report PWC give a number of examples of bad practice. One concern is ‘File Structure’, and the paragraph under this heading reads as follows:
‘Issue 78% of the projects were noted as having no logically structured files and 39% of the projects did not have separate files but were grouped together in larger files. An example of this is the project, “Youth Ambassadors” which is one of many projects in the file “Olympics”. This file was extremely difficult to review as projects were not labelled and clearly attached in separate sections and monitoring forms enclosed seemed to relate to Olympics scheme in general not particular projects’...
Not surprisingly, I struggle to reconcile this paragraph with your earlier forthright declaration.
Please will you enlighten me?
Kind regards




Morris Hickey, Redbridge says...
4:02pm Wed 20 Aug 08

It's not too long now until Thursday 6 May 2010.

Technomist, Walthamstow says...
4:34pm Wed 20 Aug 08

To the Great Helmsman tirelessy striving in his efforts to perfect his Socialist Accountancy, it must seem a long time until his next great democratic triumph. I myself can hardly wait for the next elections, when my chance will come to join the chanting masses shouldering each other aside in ecstasy at the polling booths as we decide how to reward our Dear Leader for his inspiring leadership and dedication to his cause.

Love This Borough, Waltham Forest says...
4:41pm Wed 20 Aug 08

Morris and Techomist, Mr Loakes will not be around in 2010 if the authorities deal with the accusations of the alleged fraud properly. The whistleblowers have concrete evidence to hand over to the police and there are more whistleblowers waiting to come forward. Mr Loakes has presided over a disgraceful shambles and I would be surprised if central government removes him before the scandal really takes off.

Love This Borough, Waltham Forest says...
5:07pm Wed 20 Aug 08

Knowing New Labour, they'll probably want him to take as much of the flack as possible before they depose him in the same way they deposed Tony Buckley. Not nice.

Technomist, Walthamstow says...
6:21pm Wed 20 Aug 08

Love This Borough, I am disappointed to hear this. I have never had the opportunity of the privilege Councillor Loakes giving me an evasive answer to one of my very one questions, (I am too humble a man to be lied to personally by the Great Mentor) I feel so connected to the Leader of Waltham Forest. He is like a distant uncle to me.

Councillor Loakes, our Dear Leader is a great inspiration, not just to me, but to his many admirers. His speeches are poetry, his utterances on governance pure genius - better even than watching the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics on a big screen TV in Walthamstow with the rest of the humble masses on the way home from the Off Licence. The people of Waltham Forest should admire the wisdom of Councillor Loakes' moral stances and Socialist Accountancy more than if he were Hu Jintao himself, watching imperiously as the beautiful young women flutter their fans in unison in front of the athletes in the Birdsnest Stadium. If only we could find it within us to all gather and show Councillor Loakes our public appreciation through a vigorous display of rhythmic martial arts. How I would love to wave my fists in time to the beat of the chanting and enthusiastic masses, every straining muscle physically celebrating the life and works of Councillor Loakes.

In this Olympic year, although Beijing is many miles away, we should all strive as best we can to live up to Councillor Loakes' ideals and vision for a glorious Olympic future for our Borough. Don't let the Government take him away from us. Let us rally round him and show him how beloved he is.

Long Live Councillor Loakes! Ten Thousand Years to Councillor Loakes

mdj, e10 says...
8:37pm Wed 20 Aug 08

Dear Mr Bunn,
And WFG generally: you would be doing a public service, and completing the story, if you gave us the names of the spokespeople you quote anonymously. If it's a public function, they deserve to be accountable publicly for it; if they insist on anonymity, then that itself is part of the story that we need to know. The point is that many of the staff of LBWF are much more 'political' than the Councillors, who are frequently kept in the dark, but expected to rubberstamp policies that are forced upon them: eg at the recent Planning Committee that rushed through the Big Brother TV Screen, the Planning officers were apparently forcefully urging the result that got voted through, which is not their job at all. The Louisa Oakes decision was passed without the developer even saying anything at the meeting!
Please help us know where accountability should truly lie.

Your sayYour Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE East London and West Essex Guardian Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »