News RSS Feed


Local Business Directory

LEYTONSTONE: Four-year-old booze ban zone illegal


POWERS to seize alcohol from public drinkers in the Leytonstone High Road area have been used unlawfully for the past four years, due to a council gaffe.

An alcohol restriction zone (ARZ) was implemented in 2004 to give police the power to order people to surrender alcohol if an officer "reasonably believes" that he or she intends to consume it in public.

It covers dozens of streets close to Leytonstone High Road, extending as far as Janson Road, off Leytonstone Road, to the south and the Green Man roundabout to the north, as well as Gainsborough Road over the A12.

The scheme, which was the first in Waltham Forest, has been hailed as a success by councillors, officers and police officers.

But when officials recently began to put together plans for a similar scheme covering Walthamstow High Street, they realised a major mistake had been made in the designation of the original Leytonstone ARZ four years ago.

The zone had never been ratified by a meeting of full council, contrary to the Criminal and Justice Act 2001.

This means that the zone has never been valid, and the council has now advised police they cannot lawfully enforce the alcohol restrictions.

Conservative group leader Matt Davis said: "This is a further example of the incompetence caused by the cabinet system.

"It is a simple fact of the matter that many officers think 'the council' only refers to the cabinet."

The authority has now begun the process of implementing the ARZ all over again, and has advertised its intentions to make the order.

It will come before a meeting of the full council next month.

Waltham Forest police Supt Adrian Hutchinson said police officers had acted within the spirit of the law and stopped using the powers as soon as the council informed them of the error.

Supt Hutchinson said: "I am confident that any action taken by my officers was always designed to reduce the fear and disorder that street drinking can cause.”

A council spokesman said the people responsible for the error are no longer employed by the authority.

Cllr Afzal Akram, council cabinet member for community safety, said: "As soon as we realised the alcohol restriction zone in Leytonstone was not legally binding we reached agreement with the police, to stop enforcing the zone until it could be properly introduced.

"Individuals who act in an anti-social or criminal manner will be dealt with under different powers."

Comments(4)

mdj says...
2:12am Wed 3 Sep 08

If anti-social behaviour can be dealt with under different powers what the hell is this exclusion zone for, except to create a generalised sense of infantile obedience to authority? What sort of offence is it that ceases to be an offence when you step over an invisible line on the pavement?
Councillor Akram has admitted that this type of bullying regulation is unnecessary, and does not exist to stop anti-social or criminal behaviour.
Can the anonymous (yet again) Council spokesman tell us who the people are who are responsible? And if not why not? Surely the Cabinet is responsible collectively for pretending to vote on something outside its powers. Ignorance of the law is no excuse in other contexts, so will those people who were unlawfully harassed get an apology and their drink back?
Does Supt Hutchinson not realise that 'enforcing the spirit of the law' is what tyrannies do? What is it about freedom and the Rule of Law that these people don't understand?

Morris Hickey says...
8:26am Wed 3 Sep 08

It's just typical of the power-crazy cliques that rule Britain today: 10 Downing Street, council cabinets, police, and EU Commissioners, who all "act within the spirit of the law" irrespective of whether or not such law is actually properly implemented.

JonSpedding says...
4:07pm Tue 9 Sep 08

I live in Leytonstone. The ban has been positive. The South African bar has much less random punters walking round the streets drinking and shouting. The men from the hostel no longer sit at the top of the high street drinking, abusing and littering. Overall I see only positive changes. The ban is far from fully enforced as the litter of lager cans shows. There is also a continued overflow from the pubs with glasses in their hands - that said, its so much better than it was. This is a good example of a minority ruining it for the majority - unfortunately the behaviour was also effecting many residents so it should be stopped. Not always fair. In this case a necessity.

mdj says...
5:57pm Tue 9 Sep 08

I'm not disputing there was a problem to be solved, Jon, but it can be solved by normal law enforcement,as Mr Akram has admitted, not by making up artificial 'zones' , which remind one of playground games.
Perhaps the Council might try a DVD-selling and three-card trick exclusion zone down the market and at Leyton Mills.
My point was the danger of arbitrary law-making: when someone who isn't necessarily even wearing a police uniform can tell you that what you are doing is illegal Here, but not There, ten feet away, the Rule of Law is under attack, and that's bad news for all of us.It creates a world where we have to ask, 'Is this allowed?', rather than 'Is this forbidden?': the difference is total.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses