News RSS Feed


WALTHAMSTOW: Health fears over proposed phone mast


PLANS to erect a mobile phone mast in a residential street have sparked fears over potential health risks.

The mast, proposed to be sited at a house in Jewel Road, Walthamstow, would provide mobile phone coverage for the borough of Newham from start-up company UK01, according to a document seen by the Guardian.

Residents now fear that if the planning application is approved, they could be at risk of serious health problems such as cancer.

At-home-mother Suzie McKenzie-Young, 43, who lives in Jewel Road, said: “It’s a very highly populated road and a thoroughfare down to Lloyd Park and they’re planning to put up a 10-metre mast.

“I went down to the planning office and the application is from a company in Watford. It wants to give coverage to Newham and said it’s the first of many. They seem to think Walthamstow is a soft target.”

The proposed site is just a few streets away from Greenleaf Primary School and Mrs McKenzie-Young is worried that children could be affected by the new mast.

She said: “The residents are very, very against it. There are children, pregnant women and elderly people living here and if it goes ahead, it’s them who are at risk.”

And fellow resident Philippa Phelps, 38, a probation officer, also voiced concerns, saying protests were being gathered against the proposal.

“We just feel that having this within the street is going to create an industrial feel and increase anti-social behaviour,” she said.

“It’s coming up in a poor area and they’re presuming no one’s going to do anything.”

A UK01 spokesman said the company is putting together an information pack for residents.


Your Say Your Guardian

PhilipHerlihy, Walthamstow says...
11:30am Thu 6 Nov 08

In any area of scientific study there will be a blizzard of studies with varying findings, and things get interesting when they trend, however faintly, to point in the same direction. On this topic it's clear they don't - there is no generalisable evidence that mobile phone radiation is harmful. See the website: senseaboutscience.

Many people fret about what is little more than a superstition, given the current level of scientific knowledge. Yet the same people often ignore overwhelming evidence that avoiding smoking, getting a bit of exercise and eating 5 fruits or vegetables a day can prolong healthy life considerably.

Two things we do know: 1) the signal from a mast is a fraction of what you receive from your handset (unless you shin up the thing!) 2) A mast in Jewel Road Walthamstow won't be much use to folk in Newham!

radioboffin, Walthamstow says...
7:18pm Thu 6 Nov 08

The claim that it needs to cover as far as Newham is complete piffle. These masts have a working radius of 2 or 3 miles at most. In fact UK01 has a new licence from Ofcom to roll out Pico Cells. These are literally 10,000 tiny sites offering very small coverage (less than ½ mile). Jewel Road is not the highest point around, in fact the land to the south (Towards Rose & Crown) actually rises up higher towards the Cinema along Hoe Street. It would only cover a relatively small area going from Jewel Road to say the Billet Roundabout. Ofcom have a searchable map that tells you where all these masts are and who they belong to. There are already established radio sites (such as YMCA Roof), Forest Road Fire Station, and some council owned blocks that offer more efficient coverage without creating potentially dangerous and unsightly unnecessary nuisance. Duncan (Former Government Radio Engineer)

Unity, E17 says...
2:21am Sat 8 Nov 08

Phil - wasn't there lots of "scientific evidence" that smoking caused no harm ? Of course such research was sponsored by the tobacco companies and championed by their lackeys.

Local residents have understandable concerns over safety, though you term these superstition. They are also concerned over the cavalier way that they are treated by the council. Where is your evidence that those of us who are concerned smoke. don't exercise or eat healthily ?

Two things I know 1. there is nothing that this council can do that some brown nosing creeps will not defend 2. patronising people who have concerns about their community does little to encourage particpation in the democratic process which Community Councils claim to promote




PhilipHerlihy, Walthamstow says...
1:41pm Sat 8 Nov 08

Anonymity is hardly the best vantage point from which to call people creeps.

Your sayYour Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE East London and West Essex Guardian Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »