News RSS Feed


Local Business Directory

Residents say no to Tesco's plans to build supermarket in Highams Park at a public meeting


OPPONENTS of a large Tesco development in Highams Park have voiced their objections before it is debated by council planners.

The decision whether the supermarket giant is allowed to build a 24-hour store, 253 homes, a 350-space underground car park, shops and rented space on industrial land off Larkshall Road, Highams Park, will be made on Tuesday, September 8.

But in a meeting, arranged by residents' groups the Highams Park Forum and the Highams Park Society and attended by about 80 people, the mood was clear – the Tesco is not wanted.

Residents voiced concerns about how local schools would cope with an influx of new pupils from families moving into the new homes, the size of the proposed homes, the effect on traffic caused by the proposed store, and how the design of the store blends with the local area.

Kathy Woodman, a retired headteacher, of Beech Hall Road, said: “If there are going to be 253 flats that means there are going to be around 180 families with children.

“That means there are going to around 400 children which will be looking for places at our local schools from day one.

“Has anyone thought about the impact this will have on our area?”

However, council officers have recommended that Tesco make a £530,245 contribution to local primary and secondary school expansions and £1 million to healthcare costs if a polyclinic is not built opened.

Offices also recommend that Tesco contribute £353,375 to the cost of improving roads near the proposed store.

There were also concerns raised about the size of the proposed homes.

Millie Balkan, 17, of Hale End Road, said: “The proposed homes are the size of match boxes. It is going to be couples rather than families moving in to them or they are going to be let.”

Trevor Calver, of Larkshall Road, claimed the proposed houses were smaller than specified by the council's Unitary Development Plan.

Residents were also worried that there were far more homes proposed on this application than on previous ones at the public meeting in Highams Park Secondary School, Handsworth Avenue on Wednesday, September 2.

Sandeep Christian, Highams Park Society chairman, voiced concerns about Tesco's design and feared residents in Selwyn Avenue would lose privacy and attractive views if trees screening them were to be cut down.

He added: “Tesco is planning to build the slums of the future. The flats will be five or six stories high. This kind of architecture bears no resemblance to Highams Park.

“At least the Aldriche Way estate bears some resemblance to Highams Park when it was built in the 1960s.”

The council has also advised Tesco to contribute £170,000 to planting new trees and public art.

Neighbouring Redbridge Council has objected to Tesco's plans because it claims that the shopping area in South Woodford would lose ten per cent of its trade if the development goes ahead.

The nearby authority also believes the development location contravenes its planning guidelines, those of Waltham Forest Council and government guidelines on building on town centres.

A total of 159 objections to the development, which is called Highams Green, were registered during the consultation process, while five individuals or bodies supported it.

A previous Tesco application to build on the site was blocked by then secretary of state for local government and communities Ruth Kelly, who ruled the previous plan was not in-keeping with its surroundings.

A Tesco spokeswoman said: "Tesco will be giving the council as significant contribution to spend on education in the area.

"It can either decide to build a new school or spend the money on improving existing schools.

"Tesco believes that the size of the homes are appropriate and comply with the life time home standard, which is a recommendation by the government.

"As far as traffic is concerned Tesco has carried out its own traffic survey and the council and Transport for London has also monitored the situation. Tesco believes there would be no problems with traffic if the store is approved."

She added: "We believe that the store is post modern but has elements of history such as the William Morris designs on the walls."

Comments(11)

Morris Hickey says...
9:08am Thu 3 Sep 09

Stuff Tesco.

Oliver_Highams_Park says...
10:10am Thu 3 Sep 09

The mood certainly was clear that the people of Highams Park don’t want Tesco plan - nobody at the meeting voted in favour of the current plan.

The residents obviously have a better grip on planning than the council's own supposed 'experts' who have recommended the Planning Committee, which meets on September 8, approve this poorly considered plan.

If the Planning Committee approves the plan in the face of such widespread and vocal public opposition it will surely be a sad day for democracy.

At the same time James Wiggam of Tesco’s Corporate Affairs claims Tesco are ‘Investing in the Future of Highams Park’, it would be more accurate to say Tesco is ‘Investing in the Future of Tesco’; just a cursory analysis of the plans is enough to show that Tesco doesn’t give two hoots about the future of Highams Park.

Ken Lees says...
10:40am Thu 3 Sep 09

From last but one para. on Tesco in Highams Park.
"A total of 159 letters of objections" should have mentioned that this figure is a "further" number of objections.
Following the Public Exhibition of plans at our local library 121 letters were received of which 111 were against, with 10 for the application.
The total of letters in opposition should be 270, with 15 in favour.
Not counting letters still being received, anf yet to be sent.


gutterball says...
4:45pm Thu 3 Sep 09

With regards to my comment posted on the artical a few days back, look at the photo of the people who are against the development. 95% are over 60!
Why can't people stop living in the past!

Oliver_Highams_Park says...
4:57pm Thu 3 Sep 09

Gutterball, had you actually come to the meeting you would have seen a wide range of people from all age groups.

It is also rather presumptuous of you to assume that anyone over 60 should be 'living in the past'!

Malcolm Shykles says...
9:13pm Thu 3 Sep 09

Some 100 youngsters from Highams Parks are about to start University Courses. What local jobs are available when they graduate?
Well there could be shelf stacking and till operation with the guaranteed minimum wage or we could have a Business Industrial Park with wide opportunities from Research and Development companies working with the London Universities, finance, offices, light engineering, automobile workshop etc
There are lots of highly successful people from this area but they do not stay – they join the brain drain and move away.
All we are left with are councillors more concerned with pot holes and the eliminating of car parking.

http://www.londonbid
s.co.uk/index.php/co
mponent/docman/doc_d
ownload/187-snapshot
-of-bids-across-lond
on-jun09.html

This should be a Business Industrial District, not yet another mega shop when we have Oxford Steet not far away or is it an alternative to going to the pictures?

jenipher says...
10:47pm Thu 3 Sep 09

Are there any other plans in the pipline for this part of Highams Park?
As much as I don't like the idea of a tesco isn't it better to have some kind of development than none?
Tescos do have the money to invest in the area - far more than the council do, so if it were to happen could continuing community investment not be built into the contract rather than one off investments?
It would be interesting to know how many mebers of the local community already shop in tesco/other national chains, and how many people's shopping habbits would actually be changed, how many local business would actually miss out when there is such strong local support in favour of them.
Perhaps having the free parking that a tesco would bring would encourage people to stay and shop the local area rather than being put off by limited parking and restrictions?
like i said I'm not hugely infavour of a tesco, but there must be some positives?

NotTescoPlease says...
3:00pm Fri 4 Sep 09

Yes it's true that there would be positives. For one thing I could walk to the supermarket on the way home from the station. So I'd be able to get easy access to (among other things) a lot more types of cheese than are currently available in Highams Park.

But advantages like this are tiny in comparison to the cost of this woefully inappropriate development: tiny flats, a massive store with hundreds of car parking spaces all situated right next to a level crossing in the middle of a transport system that is already congested. It really is just about the dumbest idea ever. I don't know how anyone can seriously argue that it won't increase congestion and pollution locally.

Have a look at the walkthrough of the site:
http://www.highamsgr
een.co.uk/
It is a complete work of fantasy - there would never be so many pedestrians and so few cars. It would be laughable were it not for the fact that there is a very real chance this will get built if people don't write letters and go to the Town Hall planning meeting on tues 8th Sep at 7.30pm.


The site would be ideal for some low to medium density housing. Can we have some of that please, instead of a whopping great supermarket and high density housing?

Walthamster says...
2:45pm Sat 5 Sep 09

When did a supermarket get the right to build huge housing developments in areas that are already quite crowded?

This council is turning Walthamstow into a dormitory town, with thouands more people but no work and nothing to do. Recipe for disaster. Do any of the councillors who vote for these schemes actually live in the area?

mdj says...
1:22am Mon 7 Sep 09

Mr Shykles has the key point: we need employment that keeps skills and wealth in the area, and attracts more. National retailers must come second only to betting shops for pulling locally-earned money out of the local economy. The Council, or at least the Labour group, seems to have a vision for the Borough as a commuter dormitory, a sort of Soweto, full of low-spec housing occupied by low-wage transients who have no commitment to the area (and thus won't care too much to ask awkward questions of politicians). Workplaces are constantly being replaced by high-density housing, which can only increase road and rail congestion as these new residents have to commute elsewhere to work, if they can find it. One day we'll find out that some deal was done to dump on Waltham Forest for the career advantage of those few who agreed to accept other people's rubbish (literally), noise pollution, &c.

30michael says...
7:09pm Sat 12 Sep 09

At the Town Hall Planning meeting it was mentioned by the Planning Department that this Supermarket was intended to supply Walthamstow/Chingfor
d as well as Highams Park areas and parts of Redbridge. What was NOT mentioned that in fact Tesco have already submitted plans for a Tesco Express to be built at 82 – 84 Forest Road, Walthamstow where Tesco have purchased the land. http://www.guardian-
series.co.uk/news/wf
news/4547346.WALTHAM
STOW__Tesco_plan_is_
_popular_with_reside
nts_/

So it seems Tesco is slowly increasing their Market space in the borough slowly with the carrot of building houses after Houses where this should be the job for the Councils.



HIGHAMS PARK: Residents voice final objections before planners decide Tesco fate HIGHAMS PARK: Residents voice final objections before planners decide Tesco fate

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses