News RSS Feed


Local Business Directory

Waltham Forest Council planning committee defers decision on controversial Tesco in Highams Park


RESIDENTS breathed a sigh of relief tonight as councillors delayed a decision on a controversial supermarket while the proposal is scrutinised further.

More than 100 vocal residents packed the council chambers at the Town Hall this evening to watch the planning committee debate the issues surrounding the proposed development by Tesco to build a 5,523sq ft supermarket and 253 homes in Larkshall Road, Highams Park.

But before all committee members could voice their opinions on the proposal, Valley ward's Conservative councillor Alan Siggers put forward the motion to defer the decision while more detailed information is given on the potential impact the development could have on traffic and businesses in the area.

The motion was seconded by Conservative counillor Edwin Northover, who represents Larkswood ward, and the committee voted in favour of deferring, by a majority of five votes to three.

The outcome was declared a partial victory by many of Highams Park's residents groups who spoke at the meeting to oppose the scale of the development, which they said would have a detrimental effect on the neighbourhood's roads, schools, shops and character.

Chairman of the Highams Park Forum, Roger Torode, said after the meeting: “At least it hasn't been accepted.

"We want the opportunity to pursue Tesco and to put forward a smaller store, which is what most people want.”

During the meeting, council officers outlined the reasons for recommending the development to go ahead including that it satisfied a “demonstrable need” for a large food store in the area and stating that it was “not expected” to lead to small shops closing.

Labour councillor Midge Broadly, who represents Markhouse ward, who also voted to defer a decision, questioned the impact the housing development would have on schools.

She said: “It is all very well getting money (from Tesco) for schools, but where are we going to find these places?

"If there is difficulty for Tesco to find a place to build a store, where are we going to build a school? That is an area we need more information on.”

Cllr Siggers said: “This is the biggest development we have had to deal with in a long time, but I don't feel I am able to reach an informed decision on a development of this scale given this report.”

Comments(11)

Morris Hickey says...
11:16pm Tue 8 Sep 09

It may not actually achieve a result for residents. If a planning authority fails to determine a planning application within 8 weeks of formal submission, then the applicant (Tesco in this case) has the same right of appeal to the Secretary of State (S of S) that would apply in the case of refusal. And if the S of S finds in favour of the applicant, then costs can be awarded against the planning authority. In such circumstances Tossco would not hesitate, I'm sure, to claim costs.

Cllr Matt Davis says...
12:55am Wed 9 Sep 09

Councillors Sigger and Northover are, of course the Conservative members of the Planning Committee, a most salient fact totally ignored by the Guardian.

For the information of Highams Park residents the 5 who voted for the deferment only included one LibDem; Cllr Milton Martin who, as people may know, has only just joined the LibDems having quit Labour after he was deselected by them. The other, longer standing LibDems voted against this vital measure to make sure that this application is properly scrutinised by the Committee that will make a decision on it. I really cannot understand why and doubt that residents will be able to either.


wfmywordmybond says...
12:56am Wed 9 Sep 09

"But before all committee members could voice their opinions on the proposal, Cllr Alan Siggers, Valley Ward, put forward the motion to defer the decision "
Did I read this right? The impression I get from this quote is that the Tories seemed to have predetermined their strategy before entering the room and deliberately stifled debate! Something I thought Councillor's are advised against?
In another article I commented that the Tories were in favour of regeneration...but not at any cost. I'm sorry to say that by deferring this decision the Tories are now saying...yes to regeneration so long as it's not in my back yard.

Malcolm Shykles says...
5:42am Wed 9 Sep 09

This is not regeneration.

When the Germans Bombed Britain they did not call it regeneration! The site looks bombed out because Tesco pulled down a valuable and massive warehouse to save paying rates.

The Advertising Standards Authority has proven that Tesco cannot be trusted to tell the truth on the amount traffic and other matters. The traffic problem due to a large store is an insurmountable problem.
This is a disused part of a flourishing Industrial Estate because Tesco, over the last 7 years have made it so. They have prevented Industry and thereby income through rates and jobs coming to Highams Park for seven years in what in any other London borough would be a “Business Improvement District”.
As we have not been receiving rates or any other advantage by Tesco’s ownership of the site for a time longer than WWII the Council should take it over by compulsory purchase and get Tesco to clear up the mess they have made of it (as the Germans were made to do after the war).
Tesco’s Highams Park Adventure has cost us as a borough far more than a few pence off groceries. It is time the LBWF put an end to Tesco’s crazy Development Plans and give the site back to industry.

ferdy55 says...
11:25am Wed 9 Sep 09

Regarding possible traffic problems.

These councillors only have to go to that area at the moment with the temporary traffic lights there & see what chaos that is. That would be the next thing if this place is built.......traffic lights being put in at the junction of Hickman or Jubilee Avenues!!! The roads round there couldnt take the strain of extra traffic.

tonylyngol says...
1:48pm Wed 9 Sep 09

Ok, let's say that Tesco's don't win their bid to regenerate Highams Park.
Maybe it's worth hearing what is planned as an alternative to regenerate a rapidly declining area.
We currently have approx 12 eateries, 5 overcharging supermarkets, a dodgy car park where numerous people have been mugged or car jacked and streets that we do not feel safe walking around!!!


What_a_Dump says...
5:11pm Wed 9 Sep 09

What to do about highams park! Its a tuff one, not helped by our crap council parking policy and Tesco buying and demolishing a large part of it. Lets hope Tesco get blocked because as crap as are highams park is I dont think a 24 hour Tesco and all its lorries and traffic will bring much quality of life benefit to an already congested area. Winchester road is hellish now how anyone could give planning to such a large scale store is madness. The area does not have the road infastructure for this store. Lets face it tesco is a horrible company with one motivation making money and walking over anyone in its way.

What_a_Dump says...
5:12pm Wed 9 Sep 09

What to do about highams park! Its a tuff one, not helped by our crap council parking policy and Tesco buying and demolishing a large part of it. Lets hope Tesco get blocked because as crap as are highams park is I dont think a 24 hour Tesco and all its lorries and traffic will bring much quality of life benefit to an already congested area. Winchester road is hellish now how anyone could give planning to such a large scale store is madness. The area does not have the road infastructure for this store. Lets face it tesco is a horrible company with one motivation making money and walking over anyone in its way.

jack de large says...
6:11pm Wed 9 Sep 09

I think councillors Siggers and Northover were absolutely correct. I was at the meeting last night and much of the talk was around the traffic impact which council officers and the Councils' traffic consultants (who apparently work regularly for Tesco's) were saying would be negligible. How can this be? Total car parking for over 500 cars if each of those places were only used once a day is an extra 500 traffic movements and I suspect it would be more than that! There was clearly insufficient information in the report presented by the borough's planning officers it seemed to me and many of the people sitting near me that this was supposed to go through on their say so. It must have taken a great deal of courage for these two councillors to stand up against the council officers, Tesco's and members of the other political parties who wished to see this unreasonable application "railroaded through". I congratulate them for taking this stand. I was one of the many who congratulated Councillor Siggers on his speech and principles, it is good to know that some of our councillors at least are prepared to listen to the wishes of residents rather than the aspirations of big business. It was also pleasing to note that some Labour members of the Committee voted with the Conservatives, a way forward for a better borough perhaps?

Angel786 says...
8:27am Thu 10 Sep 09

No one mentioned the 2 Labour Councillors who voted to defer, including Cllr Asim Mahmood who recently attacked Kier and the Lib Dems on the poor state pf pur streets.

30michael says...
7:28pm Sat 12 Sep 09

I went to the Town Hall last week on the 8th Sept.
I am very surprised at how the Council have badly handled this planning application with regards to just simply ignoring the views of the residents of Highams Park.
I would like to say that what seemed to come up in the meetings time after time was the word “Town Centre” which seems to the Council to imply its ok to build a very large Tesco’s.

The PDF link PPS6 Planning Policy http://www.communiti
es.gov.uk/documents/
planningandbuilding/
pdf/147399.pdf for Town Centres. In Annex A: It defines the difference between a Town Centre and Local Centre etc.
I would suggest we are more like a Local Centre and that a Tesco of this size isn’t right for us.


Residents protest before the meeting last night Residents protest before the meeting last night

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses