News RSS Feed


Local Business Directory

WALTHAM FOREST: Crisis as 162 children without primary school place


A TOTAL of 162 children still do not have a place at primary school this year as the crisis over education provision intensifies.

A council decision to provide temporary classrooms and ask other schools to find more room in order to tackle the shortfall has been branded a “sticking plaster solution” by one governor.

A total of 3,760 primary school places are expected to be needed by 2012 and funding to provide these has not been secured.

But the current shortfall shows the crisis is immediate, prompting suggestions that the council is considering drastic action, such as teaching children in church halls and community centres.

Even Liberal Democrat councillors, who run the council in coalition with Labour, have called on the authority to “get a grip on the problem”.

Mobile classrooms, at a cost of £200,000 each, will be erected at George Tomlinson and Jenny Hammond schools, both in Leytonstone, and South Grove in Walthamstow.

This will result in a total of 25 primary schools in the borough teaching in temporary classrooms and officers are still visiting schools to see which ones have space for more.

Several other schools, including Winns in Walthamstow and Wellington in Chingford, have agreed to find room for extra pupils in existing buildings.

Pat Stannard, chair of governors at Woodside School, in Wood Street, Walthamstow, which has a waiting list for places, said: “Though a few schools are being expanded permanently, the majority of extra reception places are in temporary classrooms in existing schools.

“This is a sticking plaster solution to a serious problem that is continuing to grow.

"With the birth rate still rising, it is essential that the local authority seeks funding for either new primary schools or for more permanent school expansions.

"I also believe this issue should be discussed by the full council with all the factual information provided by officers for members.”

Cllr Liaquat Ali, the cabinet member for children, said: “Increasing demand for primary school places is an issue affecting authorities across the country and Waltham Forest is no different.

“Our schools are improving, our links to the Olympic Park are creating new jobs and business opportunities, and as a result more families want to live and educate their children here so the council must work hard to ensure every child has a place.”

A council spokesman pointed to the new £15m Queens Road school due to open in 2011 and £5.7m for building work at St Saviours School as evidence that the council was addressing the problem.

He added that the authority has used birth rate projections to put together a plan until 2014, but has not provided further details.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter


Comments(19)

Helen, Walthamstow says...
4:11pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Cllr Ali's reaction insults our intelligence: “Our schools are improving, our links to the Olympic Park are creating new jobs and business opportunities, and as a result more families want to live and educate their children here so the council must work hard to ensure every child has a place.” He really must get a grip before primary education in this borough reaches a state of collapse.

The growth in the primary school population has absolutely nothing to do with the Olympic Park or people wanting to education their children in improving schools.

It is caused by one thing alone - a startling and continuing rise in the birth rate which started in 2001 in Waltham Forest. That is the result of the fact that our population has an increasing number of people of child-bearing age, and is not helped by the lemming-like dash to squeeze more and more people into more and more houses and flats, built without regard to the ability of local services to cope.

On top of that, and in spite of repeated warnings of a looming crisis, the cabinet and leading council officers have failed to acknowledge that there is a real problem. That they are clearly not coping is demonstrated by the fact that there are many children still waiting for places in reception classes, while others are being driven all over the borough to far-flung schools where a place has been found for them.

sensibility says...
5:14pm Tue 16 Mar 10

I wonder whether the "birth projections" take into account the extra homes that L&Q want to build on the Walthamstow Dog Track site?

Does it include the number of children expected to be re-homed in other new housing in the borough which is currently being built and yet to be built? I dont think so.

myopinioncounts says...
5:54pm Tue 16 Mar 10

There is a reluctance to face the fact that the increasing need for school places is due to migration into the area from eastern europe and beyond.
I wonder how many parents of these children have jobs and therefore NEED housing and school places in the London area?
As it is the most expensive part of the UK and there are a lot of empty homes elsewhere it would make sense to allocate these homes to jobless people instead of dividing homes in WF into smaller and smaller units and forcing schools to use mobile classrooms to accommodate the increase.
Surely just because someone wants to live in an area does not mean they have the right to.

Helen, Walthamstow says...
6:29pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Dear me, myopinioncounts. I know you are right that people coming into the borough, from other parts of the country as well as abroad, are part of the growth, though the birth rate is the main factor. But heaven help us if we get to the situation of telling people where they do and do not have a right to live. That was called apartheid in South Africa.

Brisbane says...
9:01pm Tue 16 Mar 10

And still we have a moronic government paying people ever larger amounts to have ever more children, even as the population spirals out of control.
Nice one Labour.

Techno2 says...
12:10am Wed 17 Mar 10

Helen, Walthamstow wrote:
Dear me, myopinioncounts. I know you are right that people coming into the borough, from other parts of the country as well as abroad, are part of the growth, though the birth rate is the main factor. But heaven help us if we get to the situation of telling people where they do and do not have a right to live. That was called apartheid in South Africa.
Helen, if you left your beloved home in Waltham Forest and turned up in Camden without having a home or job, you might not be surprised to learn that the local authority there would tell you they have no duty to house you and that you should go somewhere else. Most likely they would tell you to return to Waltham Forest.

wfmywordmybond says...
8:05am Wed 17 Mar 10

It seems this story may well have originated from below
http://www.walthamfo
restlibdems.org.uk/

Pamella says...
11:44am Wed 17 Mar 10

There is no point them expanding faith schools when faith schools have their own admission procedures are able pick and choose who gets in their schools by having admission criteria as long as your arm.

The council could do a lot to help by not allowing any more residential devleopment without a commensurate investment into the local infrastructure so that is can cope with the increased demand for services.

But thats too obvious isnt it!

Fishy Bristol says...
1:29pm Wed 17 Mar 10

You cannot blame people for taking advantage of the systems in this country and east Europeans are here legally and if they have children must send them to School or face prosecution. sadly, the Local Authority seems immune from prosecution when they cannot give a child a school place.

Fishy Bristol says...
1:31pm Wed 17 Mar 10

You cannot blame people for taking advantage of the systems in this country and east Europeans are here legally and if they have children must send them to School or face prosecution. sadly, the Local Authority seems immune from prosecution when they cannot give a child a school place.

Fishy Bristol says...
3:14pm Wed 17 Mar 10

Cllr Liaquat Ali, the cabinet member for children, said: “Increasing demand for primary school places is an issue affecting authorities across the country and Waltham Forest is no different.

Haha! And this coming from a man who takes his child out of a School on a Whim to go on holiday and who is then prosecuted and never paid the fine on time! Great! Should neer be allowed to talk on School issues!

Helen, Walthamstow says...
5:15pm Wed 17 Mar 10

It's interesting that Chris Kiernan, the officer in charge of education in Waltham Forest, is the third highest paid officer in the local authority (see previous report on this site).

I wonder what he's doing to earn his £133,500-plus.

March Hare says...
9:04pm Wed 17 Mar 10

How about birth control or a punitive tax on children? The world's massively over-populated as it is and yet we're encouraging the selfish (not to say reckless) irresponsibility of breeders? Utter madness!

stevewhite says...
9:52pm Wed 17 Mar 10

Helen, Walthamstow wrote:
It's interesting that Chris Kiernan, the officer in charge of education in Waltham Forest, is the third highest paid officer in the local authority (see previous report on this site). I wonder what he's doing to earn his £133,500-plus.
What a truely marvelous man he is and worth every penny. I think it was £145,000 after expenses. I heard rumour that he masterminded a fabulous project on the old Essex County Ground.The project was to build a great big school on the ground and deprive local residents of their much loved green space. One of the few running tracks in the borough would have gone as well. Strange that much lower paid and clearly not as intelligent people thought the idea was not so good. So, it took lots of energy, planning and money and resulted in a big fat damp squib. Well done Chris, keep up the good work.

jack de large says...
10:42pm Wed 17 Mar 10

Helen,Walthamstow, please don't be naive, our education and health systems are buckling under the weight of usage by an immigrant population, that is a matter of fact. Ken Livingstone required this borough to produce over 600 new social housing units per year, but did not require a similar expansion in either hospital or school places. That is another fact. I'm afraid a laissez-faire, come one-come all policy is crippling many parts of this country and to jump on a soapbox to talk about the "rights of man" is not a practical solution.

Helen, Walthamstow says...
8:54am Thu 18 Mar 10

Government - by which I mean governments over decades not just recently - have done practically nothing to encourage businesses and industries to operate in other parts of the country where the populations are falling causing another sort of problem.

Long-term the solution is to develop a sensible masterplan to spread work and homes more fairly across England so that people looking for work are not drawn to an over-crowded London.

That is not going to have an effect in five minutes or even five years, so it is necessary now to ask the government for the money needed to pay for school expansions here. That money may come from those places where the school populations are falling.

jack de large says...
11:31am Thu 18 Mar 10

This Council WAS given money by the government to improve its more deprived areas and, the then Leader, Councillor Loakes and his cronies on the Cabinet, nicked it, gave it to the private company that runs our education system, who did not spend it on school expansion, and to other unworthy causes. Then no doubt, spent the last of it trying to cover their tracks. I cannot claim this as a fact because the facts have been well buried but anyone who reads this webpage and the comments could be forgiven for taking it as a fact.

March Hare says...
2:44pm Thu 18 Mar 10

If you can't prove it, jack de large, I should be a little cautious about making potentially libellous comments about individuals. Whatever one may think of Cllr Loakes nothing has yet been proven against him so judicious use of the word 'allegedly' is advisable.

Mr Bernard says...
1:28am Sun 21 Mar 10

Helen is right! There would be so many unemployed and employed families that would love to live in a council property elsewhere in England if given the chance. The North has many empty properties that could prove fantastic family homes as they once were. You are also right that many governments have not realised the potential of these places and are too focused on London. Moving people from the city to other parts of the UK is not a new idea (New Towns projects) and should be looked at again. It seems ridiculous to squeeze more and more houses into a borough that has no infrastructure to support it.

I don't believe in forcing people to move but giving people the choice to do so with help from the government, and with real long term employment prospects would be a benefit to most in the South East.

The school problem will not get better regardless of how many temporary classrooms we have, we need no new developments, especially flats and need a council who can provide a decent service for those of us already here, which includes making sure that every school age child should have a place at a school not too far from home.

Yet again this is just another example in a long list of Labour/Liberal failures.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses