News RSS Feed


Local Business Directory

WALTHAM FOREST: Election blunder confirmed


THE Liberal Democrats have won an election recount and deposed a Labour councillor after it was confirmed that the council wrongly gave 1,000 extra votes to a candidate.

The recount of the local election poll for High Street Ward, in Walthamstow, was held after an appeal by the Lib Dems to the Royal Courts of Justice.

Lib Dem nominee Mahmood Hussain, 54, is now the new councillor for the ward, at the expense of Labour's Steve Terry.

Nigel Louth, a member of the public who works for the Office of National Statistics, spotted the mistake while checking the results of the poll online back in May.

He realised that the total number of votes was higher than was actually possible, considering the number of eligible voters in the ward.

Waltham Forest Council’s returning officer at the time, former chief executive Andrew Kilburn, previously said that tiredness could have been to blame for any errors.

Lib Dem leader Cllr Bob Sullivan said the outcome of the recount raised questions about the validity of other election results in the borough.

The legal action is believed to have cost his party at least £15,000 in costs, although they are hoping some of this will be paid by the council.

Mahmood Hussain, of Maude Terrace in Walthamstow, said: "It is an honour to be elected to serve the residents of High Street ward.

"I will do all I can to stand up for the interests of local people and make sure that their needs are not ignored by the Labour council.

"There are lots of issues to take up, including the future of the EMD cinema, looking after Walthamstow market and local services and pressing Labour to come clean on its plans for the Arcade site.

"I will work with residents to improve safety and security in the area and to protect and improve the local environment."

Liberal Democrat group leader, Bob Sullivan, added: "I am delighted to welcome Mahmood Hussain to the Liberal Democrat Group on the council.

"At last the people of High Street ward have the councillors that they voted for. The council's mistake at the count should never have happened.

"It has cost local taxpayers thousands of pounds in legal fees and deprived local residents of the representatives they voted for."

Steve Terry congratulated Cllr Hussain on his victory, but also used the opportunity to launch an attack on the Lib Dems.

He said: “It has been a great honour to serve the residents of High Street over the past five months and I would like to thank those who voted Labour on May 6 in the local and general elections. While I congratulate Mr Hussain, High Street residents who voted for the Liberal Democrats have a right to feel let down by Nick Clegg's u-turn on cuts.”

"Labour’s efforts to invest in new schools has already been hit with the Conservative/Liberal Democrat government cutting funding for many schools in the borough.

"I will continue to work with Labour colleagues to challenge these cuts which are so vital to our local communities and urge Mr Hussain to distance himself from Nick Clegg's cuts".

Waltham Forest Council are yet to comment.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments(12)

Sam Hain says...
11:48am Wed 8 Sep 10

Both a sad day and a good day for democracy - sad that a worthy councillor has been deposed after serving for four months, but good that the mistake came to light and has been rectified. The original mistake may be indefensible and the appeals process seriously flawed but the outcome should reassure sceptics that our democratic system, for all its faults, is not in terminal decline as some would have us believe.

Dominic Gover says...
1:03pm Wed 8 Sep 10

Maybe I should ask for a recount as well in case the counters mislaid about 3k Tory votes in High St ward! On balance, perhaps not.

Sam Hain says...
5:13pm Wed 8 Sep 10

Don't push your luck, Dominic! You've got an extra Dem so you don't need an extra Con - and besides, hell will freeze over before you get one in High Street Ward.

Phoney Investigations says...
8:03pm Wed 8 Sep 10

This guy Andrew Kilburn seems to have cost ratepayers a packet one way and another! If this council is so set on litigation in resolving trivialities why don't they attempt to recover money lost by the incompetence of its servants or sub-contractors? Be interesting to hear from Morris Hiccup on this matter!

Redfox says...
8:04pm Wed 8 Sep 10

Surely Sam has some misplaced confidence in Waltham Forest's councils' honestry profile?
Exactly when were the Labour majority going to own up to the error IF it hadn't been spotted and reported by a public-spirited person?
And as for a "worthy" councillor being displaced, the expression worthy cannot be attached to an individual who has such a short career, and one who has not achieved any successes for the electorate to which the term "worthy of his efforts" can be so opportioned.

Sam Hain says...
9:31pm Wed 8 Sep 10

Are you saying Labour knew before the error was spotted but covered it up, Redfox? If so, that's a very serious allegation which I hope you can substantiate. If you can, you are duty bound to take your evidence of what amounts to electoral fraud to the police. If not, I suggest you withdraw it promptly and unequivocally. Do you live in High Street Ward by the way? If not, on what basis do you question Steve Terry's worthiness? I never used the phrase "worthy of his efforts" so I'm not sure who you are quoting here but I daresay we shall discover in another four months whether Cllr Hussain earns the soubriquet.

highstreetvoiceofreason says...
10:42am Thu 9 Sep 10

What was Mr Hussain's role in the deselection of three prominent Lib Dem sitting councillors during the election campaign including the then Leader of the Lib Dem Councillor group and Deputy Leader of the Council, John Macklin and cabinet member, Bob Belam?

http://truthwillouti
nwalthamforest.wordp
ress.com/2010/09/08/
lib-dem-election-hig
h-court-challenge-su
ccess/

md-j says...
12:52pm Thu 9 Sep 10

'Are you saying Labour knew before the error was spotted but covered it up, Redfox? If so, that's a very serious allegation which I hope you can substantiate...'

Like them or not Sam, the Labour Party is a professional political organisation, which knew exactly how many registered voters lived in this target area, and had up-to-date information on their addresses, likely allegiances, &c. Numbers were key in what most expected to be a tightly-fought result.
And yet on election day 3000 unlooked-for votes popped up out of nowhere, without any of the keenly involved activists, canvassers and would-be councillors apparently noticing. Does that strike you as convincing, Sam?
Does it not strike you as odd that yet again, the supposed safeguards and checks failed, and yet again it was an individual member of the public who had to point out the failure?
Does it not worry you?

Sam Hain says...
3:26pm Thu 9 Sep 10

Obviously I'm hopelessly naïf, md-j. I'd assumed (like many others, I suspect)that the massive swing was triggered by the same widespread revulsion at the local LibDems' shameless internal politicking which led to the loss of some twently of their Councillors and the implosion of their group. Cllr Hussain was extremely lucky to get in in these circumstances and he has a lot of ground to make up persuading the residents of High Street Ward that he is a fit representative and that his party, now in coalition at national level with the Conservatives, is to be trusted on anything.

md-j says...
3:46pm Thu 9 Sep 10

I'm completely with you on the matter of the LD's crazy infighting, Sam: but getting more votes than there are electors isn't what I'd call a massive swing, Sam, unless I subscribed to the Saddam Hussein school of democratic thought.
Does it also strike you as odd that the local election turnout exceeded the national vote, when people are supposed to be so apathetic? Here many cared so much they also went to the trouble to organise postal votes for themselves beforehand. Admirable, really.

md-j says...
3:46pm Thu 9 Sep 10

I'm completely with you on the matter of the LD's crazy infighting, Sam: but getting more votes than there are electors isn't what I'd call a massive swing, Sam, unless I subscribed to the Saddam Hussein school of democratic thought.
Does it also strike you as odd that the local election turnout exceeded the national vote, when people are supposed to be so apathetic? Here many cared so much they also went to the trouble to organise postal votes for themselves beforehand. Admirable, really.

Walthamster says...
11:14pm Thu 9 Sep 10

I've often wondered why people who care enough about democracy to go to the trouble of arranging a postal vote can't be bothered to walk to a nearby polling station.

It seems strange, is all I'm saying.

Postal votes are so easily used for electoral fraud that it used to be difficult to get one without a very good reason. Now they're widespread. And strange electoral results are widespread too. Strange, that.


The local election count at Waltham Forest Town Hall in May. The local election count at Waltham Forest Town Hall in May.

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses