LEYTON: Park authority wants government to veto flats

Essex Wharf

Essex Wharf

First published in News by

A DECISION to approve controversial plans for blocks of flats overlooking a nature reserve looks set to be referred to the Secretary of State.

Waltham Forest Council’s planning committee this week approved an application from Sherrygreen Homes and A2 Dominion to build 124 flats in four blocks up to seven storeys high on Essex Wharf, which is within the Lee Valley Park, off Lea Bridge Road in Leyton.

This was despite objections from residents, environmental campaigners and the Lee Valley Regional Park authority (LVRP), which said the proposal was inappropriate for the location, beside the Lee Navigation canal and overlooking the Walthamstow Marshes nature reserve.

The LVRP has today confirmed that it has exercised its right to request that the decision is referred to Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Eric Pickles.

More than 50 opponents to the scheme, including members of New Lammas Land Defence Committee (NLLDC) and Waltham Forest Civic Society, packed the public gallery during the decisive planning committee meeting on Tuesday night.

A number of people spoke in opposition to the plans, including Steve Wilkinson, of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, who said the development was unacceptable in such a prominent position in the "unique" area.

However, an appeal against a decision to reject a previous application for a larger development on the site is still pending.

A hearing is expected to take place on January 18.

Sherrygreen Homes says a decision on whether to continue the appeal depends on the outcome of the current application.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:20pm Fri 7 Jan 11

mdj says...

'Sherrygreen Homes says a decision on whether to continue the appeal depends on the outcome of the current application. '
ie, all the wonderful things they said about the successful application they also said about the two even larger ones that got thrown out!
All sides accept that this land is not designated for a particular use, and that a housing proposal would not in itself be ruled out of court. The mystery is: why, over all the years that the site's commercial use was declining, did LBWF not look ahead a bit and zone it in the UDP for open air/waterside/recrea
tional use?

The fact last year that the Boroughs' planning officers had to accept unapproved developments at the riding school because they had been allowed to get away with them for too long for officialdom to intervene, tells us a lot about how this Borough is run.
'Sherrygreen Homes says a decision on whether to continue the appeal depends on the outcome of the current application. ' ie, all the wonderful things they said about the successful application they also said about the two even larger ones that got thrown out! All sides accept that this land is not designated for a particular use, and that a housing proposal would not in itself be ruled out of court. The mystery is: why, over all the years that the site's commercial use was declining, did LBWF not look ahead a bit and zone it in the UDP for open air/waterside/recrea tional use? The fact last year that the Boroughs' planning officers had to accept unapproved developments at the riding school because they had been allowed to get away with them for too long for officialdom to intervene, tells us a lot about how this Borough is run. mdj
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree