News RSS Feed


WALTHAM FOREST: Pool & Track could get £1.75m Stow leisure payout

A HOUSING association could pay £1.75million for improvements at Waltham Forest Pool & Track if it builds a residential estate at Walthamstow Stadium – but English Heritage says it still has concerns.

The revelations come in a series of documents submitted to the council as it considers London and Quadrant (L&Q)'s planning application to build a 300-home complex along with a nursery and a multi-purpose gym at the site in Chingford Road, Chingford.

The organisation has always maintained that the proposed new facilities would be an adequate leisure replacement for the loss of greyhound racing at the arena, which closed in 2008.

But in a report from the mayor's office it has emerged that the council and Greater London Authority (GLA) were not convinced and have been negotiating behind the scenes to secure a pledge from L&Q of £1.75million in compensation for other facilities.

It states that: "At this stage it is expected that this contribution will be directed towards improving the council's Waltham Forest Pool and Track facility."

The report adds that the council has already drawn up a number of proposals on what to spend the money on.

Among the proposals for the Walthamstow site are a climbing wall, a youth gym, the refurbishment of the athletics track and a new sports pitch.

Rumours emerged in September 2010 that the council was secretly negotiating with L&Q to relocate facilities from Pool and Track to the stadium, but they were denied at the time.

The report also states that L&Q's plans do not fit with the mayor's 'London Plan' strategy for the capital, but that this could be overcome if further discussions are held about the viability of its affordable housing, transport and on-site leisure plans.

Meanwhile, a separate submission to the council from English Heritage includes a number of criticisms.

The conservation body does not urge the council to reject the application, but says "the local planning authority should weigh any harm against the wider benefits of the application".

Its senior historic buildings and areas adviser, Rachel Godden, wrote that while a residential development "could be a suitable future use" for the site, "we remain concerned that the height and massing of the buildings in the centre of the site impede the sense of the space as a former stadium.

"We consider that their scale is too great".

Mike Johnson, director of development at L&Q, said: “We are fully committed to bringing the heritage buildings back into long term use for the whole community and all work to do so will continue to be done in consultation with the appropriate organisations.

"We welcome all feedback on our plans and look to incorporate recommendations where possible as we progress with our planning application.

"Our plans will deliver a £50million iconic development which preserves the heritage of the site and provides around 300 new homes, a modern sports centre run by the community for the community, a children’s nursery and allotments, as well as over 250 jobs to meet the needs of local people.”

No date has been set when a council planning committee will decide on L&Q's application.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Click here to follow the Chingford Guardian on Twitter

Comments(7)

waltham says...
7:56pm Mon 26 Sep 11

The 50 million development costs the tax payer a further total loss of 25 million !!!. but why do L&Q worry about the loss it's tax payer money !!
The" old broadwater farm style" fortress for a community who don't want it. L&Q don't and won't listern to the community. Chris Robbins doing deals with L&Q !! You could not make it up
Time up for labour party

walthamforesttruthwillout says...
10:45pm Mon 26 Sep 11

More Labour dodgy deals!!!

http://wp.me/p10VLA-
oX

myopinioncounts says...
9:07am Tue 27 Sep 11

"could pay" ! Like the developers of the Netley Road site were supposed to build a link to the high street and never did! We know how much we can rely on promises. Make them improve the Pool & Track first before allowing any development of the race track.
Also, A gym? haven't we enough gyms struggling to make a living in this borough?

mdj says...
9:33am Tue 27 Sep 11

What rules apply concerning one tax-funded entity demanding money from another tax-funded entity in order to change its decision on a planning matter? How would the law react if a private applicant offered almost £2 million to get a favourable decision? How much of L&Q's turnover comes from the Council in the first place? What overlap of personnel is there between LBWF and L&Q, who carry out delegated housing functions for the Borough? Is there a provision for private objectors to shell out a similar sum to sway the opinion of the Council against such a decision - or would that be called corruption?

L&Q - PLEASEGOAWAY says...
10:17am Tue 27 Sep 11

so to get their way, L&Q want to use yet more tax payer money to get their unwanted, unnecessary and flawed plans through!
questions have to be asked as to why L&Q are just so desperate to get this unwanted developement done. maybe a thorough investigation of bonus payments to L&Q executives is needed.
is it fair to say that L&Qs relationship with the council could be compromising councillors, who in turn abuse their position of trust and authoirty?

sensibility says...
10:20pm Tue 27 Sep 11

From what I have seen this does not form part of the planning application as submitted to LBWF.

Councillors, residents, the GLA and other authorities should concentrate on commenting on what ACTUALLY has been provided within the documents forming the planning application.

This is getting way out of hand

bishbosh says...
5:10pm Wed 28 Sep 11

The Heritage of the site was established over 75 years as a leisure stadium providing greyhound racing and stock car racing. That is what made it a great visitor attraction and put the borough on the map. The housing development will destroy that and in no way protect the Heritage assest. It will destroy the very thing that created it. Total bull from L and Q. The majority of residents do not want this and this latest development is just another way their plans could become in any way acceptable. This is now all about the boards reputations who must deliver having committed all this money on a loss making exercise that will deliver very few social housing units that will have no impact on reducing housing need. The more they spend the higher the prices for the flats they must sell.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree