Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting WFNEWS to 80360, or email us
6:30pm Tuesday 20th October 2009 in
EPPING Forest MP Eleanor Laing has admitted she “can't be confident” of winning a vote of support from Tory party members at a crunch meeting to decide her political future.
The under-fire parliamentarian, who has faced a storm of criticism over her expenses claims, faces the Epping Forest Conservative Association this coming Monday (October 26) for a vote of confidence.
If Ms Laing loses the poll, she will not stand again as party candidate for the seat, and her political career will effectively be over.
If she wins, the MP hopes it will draw a line under the controversy surrounding her expenses and help achieve her ambition of continuing to be MP for the district for “many years to come.”
Speaking to the Guardian ahead of the meeting Ms Laing said she was touched by the “many letters and emails and calls” of support, but refused to say whether she expected to win the vote or not.
She said: “I can't be confident because I don't know who's going to attend the meeting. I can only hope that the work that I've done in the 12 years I've been a member of parliament will be recognised.
“I'm always very pleased to have the opportunity to meet party members directly and set the record straight.
“But very much depends on who manages to get to the meeting because some of my strongest supporters happen to be out of the country at the moment.
“I don't know who will come to the meeting.”
Ms Laing last week repaid £25,000 to the taxpayer as a “moral gesture” over the expenses issue, and was recently told by auditer Sir Thomas Legg that she need not repay any of her claims, unlike hundreds of other MPs.
Party members in the district have all been sent a letter by Ms Laing which says “We are now on the threshold of a Conservative victory...Our Party works best when we are united.
“We should not be fighting one another – we have a common enemy that must be defeated. I really need your support to go forward together to win that battle here in Epping Forest.”
For the result of next week's meeting visit guardian-series.co.uk
"FIVE MONTHS OF PRESSURE"
Ms Laing has faced what she describes as "five months of pressure" surrounding her expenses claims.
She insists she has done nothing wrong and has always acted within the rules, and no public body has found her guilty of any wrong doing.
The Daily Telegraph newspaper revealed in May that Ms Laing has claimed more than £80,000 of taxpayers' money towards mortage interest and service payments on her second home allowance for a flat in Westminister – even though she lives less than an hour away from Parliament.
The money was claimed under MPs' Additional Cost Allowance (ACA), which is designed to be used by MPs that need a second home to carry out their Westminster work.
Ms Laing's critics argue it was wrong of her to claim on the ACA on her Westminster Flat when she could have commuted to Parliament from her home in the district.
Additionally, when she came to sell the flats she avoided a £180,000 capital gains tax bill by telling the Inland Revenue it was her main home – despite previously telling Parliament it was her second home, although this is allowed under special rules for MPs set by the financial body.
Ms Laing says she declared the Westminster flat as her second home when she first became MP 12 years ago, and "didn't think" about changing the status when she came to sell them because the rules allow MPs to declare different homes as primary and secondary residences to difference bodies, and that it was "not an issue" at the time.
Ms Laing says she will still have to pay the tax when she sells her Theydon Bois home.
Ms Laing told the Daily Telegraph when the story broke that “the definition of principal private residence for Capital Gains Tax purposes is not a matter of choice but a matter of fact.”
The rules stipulate that MPs can choose which home they consider to be their primary or secondary residence. Ms Laing says the status of her Westminster flat was a “fact” because she spent the most time there.
Correction: the meeting is on Monday October 26, not Monday October 29 as previously reported.
Comments(13)
Toby Bligh
says...
11:59pm Tue 20 Oct 09
Morris Hickey wrote:Irrelevant.
Next Monday is 26 October - 29 October is Thursday next week. Could the Guardian please clarify which it is?
Dave26
says...
8:28am Wed 21 Oct 09
Debdenite
says...
10:46am Wed 21 Oct 09
Morris Hickey
says...
10:50am Wed 21 Oct 09
Toby Bligh wrote:Irrelevant? No, not really. I simply want to know whether to look forward eagerly to Tuesday's papers or Friday's. It would also be nice for the local Guardian to get the fatcs right.
Morris Hickey wrote: Next Monday is 26 October - 29 October is Thursday next week. Could the Guardian please clarify which it is?Irrelevant. She is making the right noises and I would bet a tidy sum that she is deselected. The whole episode of tax avoidance stinks and is more pungent in the noses of people who over the past years have paid their Tax with glee.
Paulgertie
says...
12:57pm Wed 21 Oct 09
Toby Bligh
says...
1:36pm Wed 21 Oct 09
Paulgertie wrote:She has made more out of expenses by the capital growth of her properties and tax avoidance that any pension would have paid.
Maybe at last Ms. Laing is realising that people are angry about about what she has done. She may keep harping on that she acted within the rules, but maybe the electorate think the rules the MPs made are wrong. Paying back £25,000 as a "moral gesture", then constantly saying she did nothing wrong is sickening.
She voted against us seeing details of her expenses last September and when I questioned her as to why at the time she had no answer.
David Cameron said in July that anyone on his front bench who didn't pay back the money would go, hence her "moral gesture".
Let's not forget even if the Conservative Party de-select her she only has to carry as an independent until the election and she collects a nice big severance pay and retirement bundle.
Debdenite
says...
5:07pm Wed 21 Oct 09
forestwalker
says...
4:09am Thu 22 Oct 09
Debdenite
says...
11:22am Thu 22 Oct 09
Debdenite
says...
11:34am Thu 22 Oct 09
UKIP-local
says...
10:12am Fri 23 Oct 09
Debdenite
says...
11:16am Fri 23 Oct 09
UKIP-local wrote:That's another issue she keeps sweeping to the side. Frankly, it's a common practice for all political groups - effectively a state subsidy for local parties - and something that has not been raised in the expenses scandal. The trouble is that payments to local parties from MPs' expenses helps these parties pay for more and better quality election material for fighting council elections. It's not exactly fair for local opposition groups, but no party will challenge it as they all have their hands in the till.
May I draw attention to an unnecessary cost to the tax payer which is attributable to Mrs Laing? She has caused Parliament to pay over £9,000 per annum to her local Conservative Association for the use of their offices. This is said to be necessary so she can meet constituents despite her owning a substantial, unused, detached house in Theydon Bois.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Need a change? Search thousands of jobs locally and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find friendship and romance online with Two’s Company
Search Now »
Tens of thousands of houses and flats for sale and rent.
Search Now »
Every major make and model, thousands of options to choose from.
Search Now »
Morris Hickey says...
9:24pm Tue 20 Oct 09