Home page
Top Stories
Waltham Forest
Epping Forest
Wanstead & Woodford
Your Views
Bizarre London
London 2012
News
Olympic Bid Pictures
National News
Local Video News
Picture Galleries
Earthquake - February 2008
Elections 2008
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
News  RSS Feed RSS feed | About
EDITOR'S CHOICE
WALTHAM FOREST
WALTHAM FOREST: Councillor accused of benefit fraud
WANSTEAD/WOODFORD
EPPING FOREST
BUCKHURST HILL: Police probing woman's death seek her "helper"
FEATURES
LEYTON ORIENT
Orient legend Lockwood unlikely to be coming home
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
OLYMPICS: Mayor Ken in Games bid revelation

London mayor Ken Livingstone has claimed he "ensnared" the Government into bidding for the 2012 Olympics.

Mr Livingstone told a mayoral hustings event in London that he didn't bid for the Games just because he fancied "three weeks of sport" in the capital.

He said the Olympics, which will cost at least £9.3bn to stage, was just a means of extracting funding for London from central Government.

"I didn't bid for the Olympics because I wanted three weeks of sport," he told an audience at St Martin in the Fields church in Trafalgar Square.

"I bid for the Olympics because it's the only way to get the billions of pounds out of the Government to develop the East End.

"It's exactly how I played it to ensnare the Government to put money into an area it has neglected for 30 years."

Earlier this week an influential group of MPs said it had "little confidence" the £9.3bn target would not be exceeded.

The Commons public accounts committee said the original estimate of just over £4bn was "entirely unrealistic" and accused ministers of succumbing to "wishful thinking" over the cost of the Games.

The mayor's comments came a week ahead of London Mayor polling day at an event organised by Christian groups at which the candidates were quizzed on issues of faith.

The latest polls suggest the race for city hall is neck and neck, with Mr Livingstone on 45%, Boris Johnson on 44% and Brian Paddick on 9%.

Copyright Press Association Ltd 2008, All Rights Reserved.

8:11am Thursday 24th April 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: Dexterdog, E4 on 9:24am Thu 24 Apr 08
So when it all goes way over budget and they are looking for someone to blame, Ken will come direct into the firing line.

But of course he will not be around by then, once he bows out as Mr. Leavingsoon I think he will disappear.
Posted by: Mr Khalid, walthamstow on 10:05am Thu 24 Apr 08
is cost 10 bilons ponds and meybe this monys cold be useded beter? evry parson must pay
Posted by: Mr Codgers, Snaresbrook on 10:22am Thu 24 Apr 08
What a stupid logo that is! Has anyone noticed that it looks like Lis off 'The Simpsons' committing a rude act?
Posted by: Dave, Walthamstow on 12:32pm Thu 24 Apr 08
Mr Khalid wrote:
is cost 10 bilons ponds and meybe this monys cold be useded beter? evry parson must pay
evry parson must pay

Whats it got to do with ministers of religion? They cant afford it.
Posted by: Dave, Walthamstow on 12:42pm Thu 24 Apr 08
Mr Khalid wrote:
is cost 10 bilons ponds and meybe this monys cold be useded beter? evry parson must pay
evry parson must pay

Whats it got to do with ministers of religion? They cant afford it.
Posted by: Matt, E4 on 2:22pm Thu 24 Apr 08
Well that's just another thing to hate Leavingsoon for then isn't it. The Olympics are bringing no benefits to Waltham Forest, just a lot of costs that we'll all have to pay for a very long time indeed. Just fdor this alone I wouldn't vote for the man.
Posted by: GC, woodford green on 3:44pm Thu 24 Apr 08
Surely it's Sir Livingston.

We've had a 'Ken Knight mayor.
Posted by: gary, e17 on 5:20pm Thu 24 Apr 08
Mr Khalid really must take some lessons.
Posted by: Mr Codgers, Snaresbrook on 5:41pm Thu 24 Apr 08
They reckon that when the Olympics open in Stratford its going to be the first time that we will see people running fast, without being chased by Stratford Police
Posted by: Paul Delaney, Hainault on 1:06am Sat 26 Apr 08
Stratford is a crap hole, do we really want people coming from abroad to an area which hardly represents England? They will get the impression we are all from Asia and on benefits.
Posted by: mdj, e10 on 1:36pm Sat 26 Apr 08
Do you get the impression that nobody seriously wants to be Mayor? To claim responsibility for dumping billions of pounds of wasted expenditure on London just before an election has the flavour of a suicide note. Or do they really live a fantasy world where they believe their own propaganda? It would explain a lot.
BTW I think it says all you need to know about Waltham Forest that our Olympic logo has only four rings!
Posted by: mdj, e10 on 1:38pm Sat 26 Apr 08
Do you get the impression that nobody seriously wants to be Mayor? To claim responsibility for dumping billions of pounds of wasted expenditure on London just before an election has the flavour of a suicide note. Or do they really live a fantasy world where they believe their own propaganda? It would explain a lot.
BTW I think it says all you need to know about Waltham Forest that our Olympic logo has only four rings!
Posted by: Alan Griffiths, Forest Gate, London on 5:58pm Sat 26 Apr 08
Paul Delaney of Hainault knows as little about Stratford as he does about Italy and Spain.

In Stratford, Plaistow and Canning Town there are more people of African ancestry than of Asian ancestry. Ain't you heard of medal winning Christine Ohuorogu or Ade Adepitan?

House prices are now higher than in Romford. A shopping centre the size of Bluewater is opening before the Olympic Games. There's £104m of work going on at Stratford Station alone.

Stratford, centre of the Universe in less than four year's time!!!
Posted by: Alan Griffiths, Forest Gate, London on 12:05pm Sun 27 Apr 08
Former LibDem parliamentary candidate in Leyton votes for Ken Livingstone. I quote from his website:

"Why I’ve Voted for Ken
Posted by jonathanfryer on Friday, 25th April, 2008

For several years now, I’ve had a permanent postal vote, as that enables me to spend election day more usefully rather than traipsing to my local polling station. So I have already voted in the London Mayoral and GLA elections. In the former, an odd system is used, where voters get first and second preferences (why not go the whole hog and introduce STV?). My first preference went to Brian Paddick, of course, and after much agonising, I decided my second preference had to go to Ken Livingstone.

I scoured the list of the ten other candidates to see if there was anyone I could feel enthusiastic about, but there wasn’t. Sian Berry of the Greens ruled herself out by calling for the closure of City Airport (which has helped regeneration in East London where I live, and taken some of the pressure off Heathrow). Several of the others have unspeakable political views. So it was a straight choice between Ken and Boris Johnson. I understand why some people are so browned off by the current Mayor that they argue ‘anyone but Ken!’. And I think it is bad that he (or any other incumbent) was not limited to two terms. But the thought of Boris in charge at City Hall makes me choke. Ken has done some stupid things and there are sides to his character which I find off-putting. But he has also done some good things for London. Would Boris? I remain to be convinced. Anyway, Boris got ‘nul points’ from me."

Posted by: mdj, e10 on 10:35pm Sun 27 Apr 08
Do you think that Ken really wants to win this election? Claiming responsibility for landing Londoners with billions of pounds-worth of unwanted spending sounds more like a suicide note than a manifesto.Or do they all get to believe their own propaganda in the end?
In 2000 I didn't meet a single Londoner who went to the Dome: does anyone know anyone who intends actually GOING to the Olympics, spending their own money?Everyone I speak to who's at all positive thinks it'll be good for somebody else, or London as a whole in some mysterious way. Nobody talks like that about the Cup Final, do they? But then did you ever hear of a rail company laying on a Volleyball Special?
Posted by: G. Tingey, Walthamstow on 10:08am Mon 28 Apr 08
In fact, I would estimate that at least 90% of Waltham Forests' population want nothing to do with these vile "games".
But we are being forced to pay for them, for no return to us, at all.

What a con.
Posted by: Paul Canal, Wanstead on 12:30pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Time to Go Ken! Having broken his vow to only serve for two terms, Ken now admits to misleading the Government over the cost of the Olympics by £6bn. Coming in the same week that he has been caught lying again about bus and tube fare increases it seems clear that he does not deserve the tust of Londoners.

London is too important to be left in the hands of a man who is consistently "economical with the truth" and his discredited cronies.

Lets hope the wise people of Wanstead and Woodford vote for change on Thursday May 1st.
Posted by: Dave, Walthamstow on 5:15pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Isn't it part of a politician's job to be "economical with the truth"?

Joking aside though, better Ken than a racist Tory bumbler who can barely tie his own shoelaces, let alone run the nation's capital.
Posted by: Alan Griffiths, Forest Gate, London on 9:00am Tue 29 Apr 08
I'm not seeing "unwanted spending" mdj. I'm seeing serious investment in large public transport projects which will last for decades.

£1,000m for the new East London railway from Dalston to Croydon, which was bottom of the previous Strategic Rail Authority's priorities.

Stronger viaducts and longer platforms to run 3-car trains on the Docklands Light Railway.

New trains for the Overground, arriving later this year.

New signalling and longer platfomrs to run longer trains on the north London line.

Some if these might have happened without the Olympic Games 2012 - eventually.

Waltham Forest still has some arguments to win about the Hall Farm Curve, to run trains from Chingford to Stratford and the pedestrian link between Hackney Downs and Hackney Central stations.
Posted by: Sceptic, E17 on 1:53pm Tue 29 Apr 08
Beware of alleged improvements. It looks as if the long-awaited Chingford-Stratford link will REPLACE the existing route from Chingford to Liverpool Street. That will leave us a lot worse off than before. We need both - but if we can only have one, it has to be Liverpool Street.

And it shouldn't take the Olympics to put some desperately needed money into infrastructure, with London's population growing by hundreds of thousands a year.
Posted by: Mr Codgers, Snaresbrook on 4:37pm Tue 29 Apr 08
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
! Lovely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
Just a few more days for Ken to be booted out and kidnapped by Mossad for all the bad things he says about the Jews! Can't wait!

Posted by: mdj, e10 on 5:18pm Tue 29 Apr 08
Dear Alan Griffiths,
I'm all in favour of public transport investment (though it could be asked why in an electronic age we can't do things more locally, rather than less). But it's completely demeaning to say that the peasants of east London won't get decent transport links unless this ghastly gravy train of chauvinism, corruption, cheating, drug abuse,prostitution and narcissism deigns to visit for three weeks. To find that road lanes will be closed so that people who consider themselves more important than the rest of us can make us wait for them is quite simply degrading. If the Royal Family did that, we'd be a republic by now. Richard Rogers was quoted in the WFG recently that 75p of every £ spent will be for 'legacy' benefit. This has to be a lie, simply because nobody knows what the figures will be, and contradicts what Livingstone said recently. Andrew Gilligan recently made the interesting point that Tessa Jowell, who is running the mayoral campaign for Labour, must be complicit in Livingstone's lies about the true figures - and she's in charge of the Olympic boondoggle!I notice you don't actually say anything positive about the Games themselves: I think they've become a out-of-control monster with almost nothing to do with sportsmanship.
Best wishes
Posted by: Alan Griffiths, Forest Gate, LONDON on 10:55pm Tue 29 Apr 08
You're a hard-boiled cynic, mdj. But you have a better presented argument than some people on this blog.

I don't need to say too much about the Games. There is plenty on the website and some of the UK's most distinguished Engineers are involved in the construction.

The electronic age helps us do things less locally. I'm just about to meet Britains most distinguished designer of Amplifiers and mixers. His employer manufactures in China as does my brother's firm up north. But the communication is quick!
Posted by: mdj, e10 on 12:10am Wed 30 Apr 08
If a cynic is a disappointed idealist, fair cop, AG. But I bet the web won't say much about the many thousands of prostitutes worldwide expected to descend on the East End as the Games approach (10000+ in Sydney,in addition to a staunch effort from the home team). Or how much Lord Coe is making out of property deals related to the Games, and all the others who have never given a toss about East London until the dinner bell rang. Yes, manufacture in China by all means:it's miraculous, I agree - and the unemployment figures in Forest Gate are...? And you still don't rush to be the first to reassure me that you will actually go and buy a ticket!Those engineers could be doing something with their talents other than building stadia which will be dismantled after three weeks, surely?
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
'
Click here to read your local newspaper online

Know Your Nursery
Local Rugby online...
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network