Opposition growing to Domino's Pizza plans to open takeaway in High Street Wanstead

First published in Redbridge
Last updated
East London and West Essex Guardian Series: Photograph of the Author by , Senior reporter

An anonymous leaflet asking people to object to plans for a new takeaway has been landing on doormats alongside the usual fast food menus.

More than 50 people have written to the council opposing an application by Domino’s Pizza to open a branch in High Street, Wanstead.

The fast food giant wants to change the use of 147 High Street, which once housed the Cinnamon Indian restaurant, to a takeaway.

If given permission, Domino’s would open from 9am-1am on Friday and Saturday and 9am-midnight the rest of the week.

The company says it will also make some minor changes to the shop front and create up to 20 jobs if it is given the go-ahead.

Many people were only made aware of the application by a note which is believed to have been delivered to hundreds of homes.

Jack Figg, 88, of The Avenue in Wanstead, is one of those to have received the leaflet.

He said: “We didn’t even know about this plan until this note came through the door.

“Nobody seems to know who put it together, but whoever it is, I agree with everything they say. Another takeaway will only denigrate the area”

The leaflet warns of parking problems caused by delivery bikes and cars which it says could number as many as 25.

And it says a takeaway would lead to problems with people loitering in the street, an increase in crime and even hit house prices.

Reny Morsch of Overton Drive is one of those who has written to Redbridge council objecting to the proposals.

She said: “Wanstead High Street has already got a sufficient number of takeaways.

“Another will not add to a diverse, interesting high street that people want to come and visit.”

And she added: “It does not promote healthy eating to the population, in particular to schoolchildren.”

But in a letter accompanying its application, Domino’s says it would enhance the area and that it prides itself on being ‘a good neighbour’.

It says its stores rarely generate litter and that a member of staff carries out regular inspections of the surrounding store area during opening hours.

And it states: “Given that there are very few hot food takeaways within the surrounding area, there can be no justifiable objection based on an over-provision or clustering of such uses.”

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:28am Mon 11 Feb 13

T. Watts says...

I always love the way these big companies play the 'job creation' card. Yes, 20 jobs - low skilled, low paid, short-term.
I always love the way these big companies play the 'job creation' card. Yes, 20 jobs - low skilled, low paid, short-term. T. Watts
  • Score: 1

12:00pm Mon 11 Feb 13

Cornbeefur says...

The pizzas are a contributory factor to National Obesity and consideration should be given to banning these like R Hon Loakes MP has in Waltham Forest.

Many schools around here. Then again they still served pizzas in schools.
The pizzas are a contributory factor to National Obesity and consideration should be given to banning these like R Hon Loakes MP has in Waltham Forest. Many schools around here. Then again they still served pizzas in schools. Cornbeefur
  • Score: 0

12:21pm Mon 11 Feb 13

spcdust says...

Can't see why this would get rejected, It was a food outlet before and remains so, no change of usage or zoning classification required. Outlets, such as Dominos, are predominantly home delivery so this notion of people loitering and crime increasing seems some what scaremongering. Same with the idea of there being up to 25 delivery vehicles / bikes and house prices being damaged. I suspect there is is an element of snobbery at play here on the part of the objectors but snobbery does not make a valid argument against such a development.
Can't see why this would get rejected, It was a food outlet before and remains so, no change of usage or zoning classification required. Outlets, such as Dominos, are predominantly home delivery so this notion of people loitering and crime increasing seems some what scaremongering. Same with the idea of there being up to 25 delivery vehicles / bikes and house prices being damaged. I suspect there is is an element of snobbery at play here on the part of the objectors but snobbery does not make a valid argument against such a development. spcdust
  • Score: 0

12:52pm Mon 11 Feb 13

HottRedMan says...

Hmmm, maybe the annoymus letters are a conspiracy theory of competition from Papa Johns Pizza.
Hmmm, maybe the annoymus letters are a conspiracy theory of competition from Papa Johns Pizza. HottRedMan
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree