Report this comment
  • "
    waltham wrote:
    well you foot the 22 million loss for the tax payer then !!

    if your OK with a registered social landlord offering no Social rent and the affordable 24 units costing you nearly a million each !!
    The units will be let to people needing housing and who have no interest in watching dogs chasing a toy hare around a track, gambling money they cannot afford to lose.

    If the rents are too high they will receive Housing benefit through their entitlements.

    The extra people will boost the economy locally.

    The Track had its days which were great fun. Like all good things, they come to an end ultimately.

    Why are you saying that I should 'foot the bill?'

    I am not involved in anything there."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

  • Enter the above word in the box below

Campaigners lodge appeal against Boris Johnson's decision to approve plan to turn historic Walthamstow Stadium into a housing estate

Walthamstow Stadium appeal 'lodged today by campaigners'

Walthamstow Stadium appeal 'lodged today by campaigners'

First published in Waltham Forest East London and West Essex Guardian Series: Photograph of the Author by , Senior reporter

AN APPEAL has been lodged against Boris Johnson's decision to approve controversial plans to turn Walthamstow Stadium into a housing estate.

The Mayor of London backed London & Quadrant's (L&Q) controversial proposal to build a 294 homes on the Chingford Road on Tuesday.

However, campaigners who want dog racing to return to the site have submitted a challenge to Communities Secretary Eric Pickles this morning (November 1).

Save Our Stow campaigner Ricky Holloway said: "There's a lot of problems with the plan and we've submitted an appeal on those grounds. There's a compelling case for Eric Pickles to address. We've got over 60 areas we'll be appealing on."

Those include the density of the development, the lack of affordable housing, and a traffic report which Mr Holloway claims is out of date.

He also claimed the mayor's report had not addressed millionaire Bob Morton's alternative plan, which he claimed would create 500 jobs - and said the report failed to explain where L&Q's 250 jobs would come from.

Chingford MP Iain Duncan Smith blasted Boris Johnson's decision and is set to meet with Eric Pickles tomorrow to discuss the issue.

Walthamstow MP Stella Creasy has also pledged to lobby Mr Pickles.
The two have been highly critical of L&Q's handling of the site, which has been left derelict since it closed in 2008.

They have called for alternative proposals to be considered, claiming the community is largely against the development of the stadium.

However, Mr Pickles told the Guardian this morning that his intervention would be out of the ordinary.

He said: "I have a completely open mind but it would be unusual were I to step in. I can only go on the basis of planning issues."

Boris Johnson said the stadium was an acceptable loss considering the benefits the development would bring the area, including a £1.75 million grant for improved facilities at the nearby Waltham Forest Pool & Track.

He also said no viable alternative for the site had been put forward. Speaking to the BBC this morning, Mr Johnson called the possibility of having a dog track "moribund" and said had he refused the application, he would have been overruled on appeal.

The Mayor had previously expressed concern at the viability of the development, with L&Q facing a large short-term loss which campaigners say would be offset by taxpayers' money.

L&Q maintain there would be no losses in the long-term.

The plan was initially approved by Waltham Forest Council in May.

Andy Rowland, a director at L&Q, said: “We are pleased that the Mayor of London has allowed our proposals for the Walthamstow Stadium site. We now look forward to beginning work as soon as we can, subject to meeting the remaining conditions in the planning process.

“We will build 294 much-needed, high quality homes for people on a range of incomes. Our scheme will bring £50m worth of investment into the borough, including £3.8 million to improve local leisure, education, health and transport facilities.

"This will preserve the architectural heritage of this iconic and historic site for the whole community. Our plans will also create up to 250 jobs, including many apprenticeships and training opportunities for local people.”

Comments (26)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree