Waltham Forest News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


WALTHAM FOREST: Poor fund scandal action plan 'must be broadened'


THE scope of a review into how the council has responded to its long-term failure to manage money to help the poor must be broadened, the authority’s chief executive has warned.

Former interim chief executive Roger Taylor ordered an independent audit of progress being made to ensure proceedures were tightened after the authority was left reeling in the wake of the scandal.

However, current council boss Andrew Kilburn has warned ruling councillors that the current review must be extended to ensure its credibility.

In a report to Cabinet, which is due to be discussed on Tuesday (February 24), he said: “It is my view that this proposal, whilst well-intentioned, does not go far enough in providing the level of assurance needed.

“Members and external stakeholders do not only need to be satisfied that the council is taking action to put things right, they also need assurance that the necessary improvement in the standard of the council’s contracting has been achieved.”

“For this reason, I propose commissioning an independent audit with a far broader purpose than originally envisaged.

"The terms of reference for this work will be: to rigourously review all the council's arrangements for procurement and contract management and to make recommendations for any further improvements that may be required in the light of both the auditor's findings and best practice elsewhere."

Documents reveal a systemic failure within the council to correctly allocate, administer and monitor Neighbourhood Renewal Fund spending since 2004.

A police investigation is currently conducted into allegations that EduAction, the company which used to manage education in the borough, used NRF money to boost profits.

The Better Neighbourhood Initiative (BNI) was launched in an attempt to target NRF more effectively, but it later emerged that many BNI contracts, totalling millions of pounds, did not follow rules to prevent fraud.

A detailed audit is currently being carried out into all BNI projects between 2006-8.

The council says it has found no evidence of fraud.

Comments(6)

Walthamster says...
10:05am Fri 20 Feb 09

"The council says it has found no evidence of fraud."

Council leader: Clyde Loakes.

Who chaired the Local Strategic Partnership (the accountable body for NRF) till a few months ago? Clyde Loakes.




Hogwasher says...
10:59am Fri 20 Feb 09

"It is my view that this proposal, whilst well-intentioned, does not go far enough in providing the level of assurance needed"

Peter Kilburn is correct, but only up to a point. It is my view, howevere that the current review was delibreately ill-intentioned from the start, designed as to avoid the obvious conclusions that the incompetent, the corrupt and the dishonest parasites responsible are still there at the council.

It also does not go far enough in providing the level of assurance needed because the people responsible have not yet all been sacked, forced out of office, and/or put in front of a jury.

Peter Kilburn needs to get real: theer are some very good people working with him in the council, but some of the people he is smiling and nodding at as he walks round the council offices are little different from organised criminals.

NT says...
12:08pm Fri 20 Feb 09

Sadly, I believe that Hogwasher is largely right.
The Council is now skating on very thin ice indeed.
Some unambiguous answers must be given to some very elementary questions, and soon.
If disciplinary action needs to be taken, then it must be taken, no matter how senior are the people involved.
The public must be kept informed.
The temptation to continue with the current policy of denial and cover-up must be resisted.
Those are the minimum requirements for restoring confidence.
NT

Cllr Matt Davis says...
6:12pm Fri 20 Feb 09

Come on Guardian, the Council's Chief Executive's name is Andrew Kilburn, not Peter.

On the BNI fiasco though Mr Kilburn is totally correct and the focus of the investigation needs to be on Cllrs Loakes, Robbins, Pye, Wheeler et al who were responsible for the mess, especially Cllr Loakes, but still refuse to do what is right and accept that responsibility.

NT says...
6:36pm Fri 20 Feb 09

Further to my previous comment, here is an example of where it currently all goes wrong.

If you check the Action Plan now in place to sort out the contracting mess, here

http://www1.walthamf
orest.gov.uk/moderng
ov/Published/C000002
87/M00001821/AI00011
011/$11ContractsFebC
abinetReportAppendix
A.docA.ps.pdf

point 9 reads:

"In relation to the audits of NRF and BNI, Directors to investigate any failings on the part of their officers...".

I am not making any allegations of any kind, but if one was really intent on sorting this out, wouldn't one keep an open mind, and investigate all those who were involved - in other words not just the officers, but also the relevant Directors and Councillors?

Why the apparent assumption that the latter two groups are beyond questioning?

Second, I am very concerned about what this is all costing. The Council brought in PWC to investigate the BNI on a contract worth of tens of thousands of pounds. Some other outfit is as of today going over the same ground, calling in officers one by one and asking them to provide the right bits of paper. Now the Chief Executive wants yet another investigation.

Should not some hard questions be asked about those who were responsible for the earlier investigations’ commissioning? To put it bluntly, neither appears to have achieved very useful ends.

One final thought.

I often reflect on the fact that when I first raised the Dr Foster contract with the then Interim Chief Executive, he assured me

"In respect of the procurement procedures employed in the case to which you refer, I am satisfied that this matter was dealt with appropriately in that, in accordance with the Council’s rules, three tenders were sought".

Of course, he later changed his mind, but what I was most struck by was the lack of understanding that his letter displayed about what the tendering rules actually stated - because it was never enough to seek three tenders, you had to actually have them (unsurprising really: the word "sought" opens up a legal minefield).

It’s a reasonable expectation that a Chief Executive - Interim or not - should know his own organisation's tendering rules.

Isn’t it?





Hogwasher says...
12:12am Sat 21 Feb 09

Cllr Matt Davis wrote:
Come on Guardian, the Council's Chief Executive's name is Andrew Kilburn, not Peter. On the BNI fiasco though Mr Kilburn is totally correct and the focus of the investigation needs to be on Cllrs Loakes, Robbins, Pye, Wheeler et al who were responsible for the mess, especially Cllr Loakes, but still refuse to do what is right and accept that responsibility.
And what have you done Mr Davis to hold these numpties properly to acccount? Where is the forensic genius and attention to detail which we expect from an effective opposition? The fact is that the Tories have given these people an easy ride for years. Get your fingers out please and raise your game.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses