Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting WFNEWS to 80360, or email us
8:59am Friday 15th January 2010
WALTHAM Forest could lose out on the advantages of staging the 2012 Olympic Games, along with the four other ‘host’ boroughs.
Fears have emerged that ambitious plans to change the face of some of the capital’s most deprived areas could be held back without huge effort and cooperation from the Government and Boris Johnson.
Dee Doocey, chairman of the London Assembly’s economic development committee, said east Londoners risked being “left out” without securing cash to firm up the Games’ legacy in terms of “skills, jobs, housing and standard of living”.
Areas where the host boroughs are falling behind the rest of London include unemployment, education and skills.
The targets have been called hugely ambitious and concerns were raised over whether they could be met without the necessary funding being secured.
The economic development committee is now looking into the role of the Olympic Park Legacy Company, responsible for the future of venues and parkland.
It is also in charge of overseeing the future of the benefits to the five ‘host’ boroughs (Newham, Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Waltham Forest and Greenwich).
Techno2, Walthamstow says...
9:25am Fri 15 Jan 10
newyear, says...
11:06am Fri 15 Jan 10
Silent Majority 2009, Walthamstow says...
2:12pm Fri 15 Jan 10
newyear, says...
5:06pm Fri 15 Jan 10
G. Tingey, Walthamstow says...
12:28pm Sat 16 Jan 10
Seeing Sense, Walthamstow says...
9:24pm Sat 16 Jan 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Need a change? Search thousands of jobs locally and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find friendship and romance online with Two’s Company
Search Now »
Tens of thousands of houses and flats for sale and rent.
Search Now »
Every major make and model, thousands of options to choose from.
Search Now »
G. Tingey, Walthamstow says...
9:05am Fri 15 Jan 10
There are none at all.
The whole thing is a waste of our money, designed to put kudos and rewards in the pockets of greedy developers, and the fascits who are in charge of the Olympic movement.
If you think that last statement is a bit extreme, I suggest you look up the boss of the "Olympic movement", Samaranch - he is a real, actual, ex-Franco fascist.
An even nicer person to know than the vile Coe, in fact.
P.S. Why were the people of London never asked if they wanted the "olympics"?
Because we didn't, and still don't!