Waltham Forest News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


CHINGFORD: Residents "not consulted" about flats plan


RESIDENTS of a block of flats are angry after an application for an extra storey to be added to their building was approved without their knowledge.

People living in a block of six flats at Ridgeway Court, in The Ridgeway, Chingford, say they were not consulted by the council over the plans to build two further flats on top of their building.

However, planning documents show residents living in about 80 surrounding properties were consulted about the application, submitted by Atlantic Housing.

The scheme was granted permission subject to conditions under delegated planning powers on January 21.

According to the residents, the first they knew of the plans was on February 22, when the owner of one of the top-floor flats received a Party Structure Notice dated February 10, informing them works were to be carried out.

After investigating how the application had been granted without prior consultation, the residents discovered they were missed off the list of neighbours for consultation by the council's planning department, despite being owners and tenants of the block.

They also claim an error was made on the application form, as the applicant's agent CG Architects gave incorrect information about the ownership of the block.

Holly Smith, 25, speaking on behalf of the residents, said: “The council has completely failed the leasehold owners of the flats and deprived us of our rights to consultation.

“Aside from any rights under the planning laws we also feel we have been deprived of our human rights to consultation.

“The application must surely be defective because the form was completed incorrectly and none of the correct notices were served on the freeholder or leasehold owners of the flats.

“We have suggested to both the planning department and the applicant that the easiest resolution for everyone would be for a fresh application to be made, for the correct notices to be served and the correct consultations to take place, but so far neither has offered to do this.”

The residents have issued a formal complaint to the council and are awaiting the outcome.

A council spokesman said residents have been advised they have the option of seeking a judicial review if they want to take action before the outcome of the complaint, which is currently under investigation.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments(8)

March Hare says...
2:28pm Fri 12 Mar 10

And will heads roll for this gross incompetence and crass ineptitude? Are those pigs flying by?!

Walthamster says...
4:09pm Fri 12 Mar 10

Was this the same kind of 'consultation' carried out for distribution of the BNI Poor Fund, in which nearly half the post codes in a survey were found to have been made up?

Or the same kind that was finally, reluctantly, carried out about St James Street library, 15 months after the library was closed without warning, after campaigners had revealed the closure broke a string of rules? When council officers claimed the survey had been delivered to every local street, even though campaigners couldn't find anyone who had received one?

And now we're expected to believe that 80 local residents, including six living right underneath the planned works, were consulted, and not one of them made a squeak of protest?

Far from telling the residents to seek a judicial review, I'd say it was the council's duty to stop any work at once, carry out a genuine consultation, and take action against whoever supposedly carried out the previous consultation.

Morris Hickey says...
4:34pm Fri 12 Mar 10

"A council spokesman said....". What a bloody nerve! They make a complete balls of the process and then expect residents to go to the very high cost of judicial review! BOOT 'EM OUT ON 6 MAY.

ITISMEAGAIN says...
9:38am Sat 13 Mar 10

Too many fat brown envelopes going around. It is all fuelled by greed. Back handers for planning permission, and backhanders for contracts.There needs to be a thorough private investigation, into all activities on the council.And the missapropriated missing MILLIONS. They will say they will do an internal investigation, Only when it suits them. Everything else has to be put out to private sector.It seems that the M P's and councillors are all as corrupt as each other

Morris Hickey says...
5:31pm Sat 13 Mar 10

ITISMEAGAIN wrote:
Too many fat brown envelopes going around. It is all fuelled by greed. Back handers for planning permission, and backhanders for contracts.There needs to be a thorough private investigation, into all activities on the council.And the missapropriated missing MILLIONS. They will say they will do an internal investigation, Only when it suits them. Everything else has to be put out to private sector.It seems that the M P's and councillors are all as corrupt as each other
If you have any evidence that what you are saying is true then have the guts to say it using your REAL name and not by sheltering behind a pseudonym.

myopinioncounts says...
5:45pm Sun 14 Mar 10

This can't be legal if the residents really were not consulted BUT it seems strange that not one of them heard anything from the people around them who did get notice of the proposed development.
Is this a sign of a lack of the community talking to each other?

Walthamster says...
11:05pm Sun 14 Mar 10

MyOpinion - I wouldn't be at all surprised if no one was consulted. This is not unusual in Waltham Forest.

St James Street Library was closed without any warning, let alone the legally reqauired impact assessments or any consultation. A playground is currently being developed in Coppermill Lane after a 'consultation' in which people trying to register their views found no one was available to take their calls. It doesn't matter whether it's legal or not. The council just does it!

jack de large says...
8:44am Mon 15 Mar 10

I don't think it is up to neighbours to consult with neighbours over a planning application. The planning department has a statutory obligation to carry out a proper consultation. If this has not been done the council has acted outside his powers.

It is interesting that the council "spokesperson" suggests a judicial review, a very expensive remedy. However, this seems a breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act and a case for maladministration to the Local Government Ombudsman, a service which should be used much more in this borough, lets face it, there are no shortage of reasons.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses