Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting WFNEWS to 80360, or email us
11:22pm Thursday 15th April 2010 in Waltham Forest News By Mhairi Macfarlane
CUTS to spending in education and the health service were some of the key issues debated by parliamentary candidates this evening.
Hosted by Waltham Forest Trades Council, candidates from four political parties presented their arguments to about 60 residents at Quaker Hall, in Jewel Road.
Walthamstow candidates included, Farid Ahmed standing for the Liberal Democrats, Daniel Perrett for the Green Party, Nancy Taffe for the newly-formed Trade Union and Socialist Coalition, and Leyton and Wanstead Labour candidate, John Cryer.
There were no parliamentary candidates from the Conservative Party or from UKIP.
Residents called on candidates to give their views on cuts to public services and strike action by public sector workers. All candidates said they supported workers' right to strike.
One resident asked candidates for their views on education, including trust schools and academies.
John Cryer said he fully supports state schools and that the “crumbling” schools of more than ten years ago have disappeared because of Government investment.
But he said he is concerned about academies because of a lack of “accountability”.
Ms Taffe responded: “I find it amazing that we have a politician saying he supports state schools, when we have a history of privatisation of services.”
Mr Perrett argued tuition fees should be abolished and higher education funded by higher taxation on high-incomes.
Mr Ahmed said teachers spend too much time dealing with paperwork which is a “great strain” on their time.
Health visitor, Norma Dudley, asked the candidates for their views on NHS Waltham Forest's proposals to introduce more health services, such as minor surgery and blood tests, at 'polyclinics' in the community.
Mr Ahmed praised the services at Whipps Cross Hospital and said: “If you take away acute services like that it will be a tragedy for our community.
"There's an argument that certain services can be provided in the community, but that decision should be left to doctors and nurses and not thrust upon them.”
Mr Cryer said more services, such as blood testing in surgeries could make life easier for patients, but it could become too centralised.
Mr Perrett said he was “disturbed” by possible cuts to the health service.
Ms Taffe said that although an efficiency saving looked good to executives on paper, the cuts would be the “death” of the health service.
Other issues raised by residents varied from freedom of the press, to Palestine and how to tackle racism in Waltham Forest.
Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter
Comments(11)
Techno2
says...
9:56am Fri 16 Apr 10
Walthamstow_resident
says...
10:43am Fri 16 Apr 10
April Showers
says...
11:29am Fri 16 Apr 10
Robert19
says...
3:26pm Fri 16 Apr 10
fabster
says...
4:16pm Fri 16 Apr 10
Techno2
says...
4:28pm Fri 16 Apr 10
Robert19 wrote:It is too much for one person, unless you happen to be in the High Street ward, where neither Liaqat Alil (Labour) or Johar Khan (LibDem) would regularly attend their surgeries, leaving a great deal of the non-contentious, non-glamorous casework (i.e. not involving photo opportunities) to be covered by James O'Rourke alone.
Um Attractive as it sounds I suspect the idea of a single member ward will lead to even more difficulty in getting good candidates to stand. Unlike MPs ward councillors have minimal support to carry out their duties. If they run a weekly advice surgery, deal with constituents' case work, liaise with local organisations, carry out street surveys etc as good and conscientious councillors do, then I think that is much too much for one person to deal with and have some kind of home life or even work life. Also not all councillors are conscientious as we know. If you are stuck with one that isn't then you will not get representation or support from them and there is no alternative councillor to go to. Can I also comment on council officers going on 'junkets' to America. I accept Secretary of UNISON Dave Knight's comments about giving social workers decent salaries and conditions, but there is a crisis in social work largely due to the red top press crucifying them at every available opportunity. This leads to even worse services as the offices are full of short term agency staff and from anecdotal evidence from teachers there is very poor to no support to vulnerable young people in this borough. Agency staff cost between a third and a half of their salaries again in fees to employ - which does reinforce Dave Knight's point. However I believe the crisis is more critical than this and to recruit staff direct in the employ of Waltham Forest is win win both in cost and continuity of care. What is the difference to staff going to Australia to recruit primary teachers as happened a few years ago when there was a shortage in local schools and what is happening to recruit social workers now? Is it because teachers are more popular and their absence is more immediately obvious? In the medium term better salaries for social workers is the solution, but what is happening in Local Government means this is not likely for the next few years.
fabster
says...
4:44pm Fri 16 Apr 10
devilsmojo
says...
5:04pm Fri 16 Apr 10
April Showers
says...
10:27am Sat 17 Apr 10
Leyton Boy
says...
10:55pm Sat 17 Apr 10
Need a change? Search thousands of jobs locally and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find friendship and romance online with Two’s Company
Search Now »
Tens of thousands of houses and flats for sale and rent.
Search Now »
Every major make and model, thousands of options to choose from.
Search Now »
myopinioncounts says...
8:58am Fri 16 Apr 10
That should save quite a bit!