Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting WFNEWS to 80360, or email us
4:13pm Tuesday 7th September 2010 in
UNIONS are on a collision course with the council over plans to cut jobs as part of sweeping changes at the town hall.
Unison, Unite and the GMB have all accused the council of rushing through the proposals and say the changes will impact on frontline services.
The cabinet, which has said it needs to save £7.2million this financial year and a further £30million by 2013, will discuss the proposals at a meeting next Tuesday (September 14).
The council say the changes will see about 80 jobs lost and save around £2.3million.
But unions estimate nearer 100 posts will go and further cuts are inevitable following the Government’s comprehensive spending review in October.
They also accuse the council of sparing senior management in the shake up while ditching more junior posts, a claim denied by acting council chief executive, Martin Esom.
It is also feared that some staff will simply be re-hired under new job descriptions, with lower wages and increased workloads.
The authority was also criticised for its continued use of expensive consultants when widespread cuts are being pushed through.
The plans mark "phase two" of council cost-cutting exercise following a large reduction in Government funding.
Mark Holland, regional organiser of the GMB, said: "It appears to us that the savings will be made further down the structure and that the deletions at senior level will be replaced by alternative senior posts."
Carolyn Simpson, regional officer for Unite, said: “We are concerned that the actual number of senior posts appears to increase rather than decrease [under the plans]”.
A council report states: “Staffing costs make up a significant proportion of the council’s budget.
“It is therefore important that staffing structures are completely aligned with the council’s priorities.
“In practice this means reducing the number of managerial, support and back office staff as far as is reasonable and reinvesting resources in the front line.”
Meanwhile the Guardian has also learned that the council has been left with a budget shortfall of a further £3million in cash it has already spent following the Government's decision to scrap the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme.
Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter
Comments(6)
Sam Hain
says...
5:47pm Tue 7 Sep 10
Obstinate
says...
6:17pm Tue 7 Sep 10
Nicholas Gascoine wrote:Correct! The managers once again will sort themselves (and each other) out with either higher paid jobs, bigger empires, nice pay-offs for the cancellations of their contracts or early retirement deals while the people that actually have to get the work done will lose out - hence the people who need the services also losing out.
If LBWF go true to their usual form, they'll keep all the "managers" and sack anyone doing anything useful .....
Sam Hain
says...
8:29pm Tue 7 Sep 10
hotredman
says...
11:28am Wed 8 Sep 10
EducateCommunities
says...
11:24pm Wed 8 Sep 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Need a change? Search thousands of jobs locally and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find friendship and romance online with Two’s Company
Search Now »
Tens of thousands of houses and flats for sale and rent.
Search Now »
Every major make and model, thousands of options to choose from.
Search Now »
Nicholas Gascoine says...
4:36pm Tue 7 Sep 10