Waltham Forest News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


WALTHAMSTOW: Church defiant after EMD defeat

AN evangelical church has vowed to continue its fight to convert a former cinema into a place of worship.

An application by the United Church for the Kingdom of God to re-open the grade-II listed former EMD building in Hoe Street, Walthamstow, as a church was unanimously rejected by councillors last night following an emotionally charged meeting.

Hundreds of supporters of the church and campaigners pushing for the venue to re-open as a cinema packed the Assembly Hall, with many were left outside.

Listen to the crowds chanting:

Listen!

Commitee members agreed that the plan would have a detrimental impact on the local economy and is not compatible with the building’s special historic interest.

But Following the committee’s decision to uphold planners' recommendations, the church remained defiant.

UCKG’s Pastor Paul Hill, who before the meeting said the church had the support of 3,000 local people, confirmed an appeal against the decision will be lodged.

He said: “The outcome was expected, wasn't it? The committee was going to follow the officers' report.

“We will never be able to appease those who are opposed to our plans.”

Council leader Chris Robbins said the right decision had been made and the authority will challenge any appeal.

The newly-formed Waltham Forest Cinema Trust, which hopes to raise £9 million to buy and renovate the cinema, said it will be contacting UCKG today with an invitation to begin negotiations on a possible sale of the venue.

East London and West Essex Guardian Series has no responsibility or control over the content on external blogging sites, but you can contact us if you have a complaint.

Comments(26)

Jeremy_Griffiths says...
10:33am Thu 19 May 11

And we, Pastor Paul, will be there to fight YOU and your shoddy plans for our beautiful cinema! We the people of Walthamstow do NOT WANT you in that building. You do NOT have local support and we will fight you until we are victorious!

McTodd says...
10:43am Thu 19 May 11

At last Waltham Forest's councillors have done something their community can be proud of!

"Council leader Chris Robbins said the right decision had been made and the authority will challenge any appeal." Fight the good fight, Councillor Robbins!

Maybe Pastor Paul will think twice in future before ranting to councillors in front of hundreds of Waltham Forest residents, "THE CINEMA IS OURS!!!"

no place like stow says...
11:18am Thu 19 May 11

Open message to Pastor Paul...

Please show the council the names of these 'residents' you claim to have support from and could you ensure that it's a full postcode within the borough...and registered council tax....before you claim these shoddy numbers...

I believe the residents of waltham forest have said no....the make believe residents, as with your current church plans do not exist...

Now, please stop wasting your parishioners money on what is now arugably an ego seeking claim rather than one which will benefit your 'church' which lest you forget, already has a significant enough presence in nearby finsbury park, kilburn, seven sisters...need I go on?

The arrogance that you continue to display, demostrates the lack of sincere christian values you claim to hold...and this is why you will continue to be sent packing. 'Your' money is not enough to stake a claim in this community...

Hex, E11 says...
1:32pm Thu 19 May 11

I wasn't able to attend but my thanks to those on Twitter (@saveourcinema, and everyone using the #saveourcinema hashtag) for providing rolling coverage of this event. And of course thank you to the councillors for making the right decision.

daveWood says...
2:28pm Thu 19 May 11

I totally agree with No Place Like Stow. Also, local vicars, etc would like to get a small amount of what the UCKG Pastors 'earn'. This 'church' is certainly not a christian one.

Stow58 says...
4:11pm Thu 19 May 11

I was at the meeting last night.

Pastor Paul certainly seemed lacking in the humility one might expect in a "man of the cloth".

I was encouraged by the laconic response of one of the planning officers, who commented that, although the UCKG may own the building, it did not mean that they could do with it as they pleased.

There was a good turn out by the locals last night, although the UCKG "locals" presumably all live in the west of the borough, judging by the numbers piling on to the 123 bus (and the tube apparently.

The community has spoken, and the council, I feel were listening. Whether the "Scientology-lite" bods will is another matter.

no place like stow says...
4:26pm Thu 19 May 11

Stow 58...I think you're being very generous and charitable in suggesting the UCKG members who attended last night even reside in the borough..further west out of the borough I'm in no doubt...given the complete blank look on most of their supporters faces did not even seem to have a clue to the nature of the debate as clearly their sole purpose in attending was to show numbers rather than a meaningful contribution; needless to say; their blatant attempt to ferry in 'local support' was to no end...

The Stowaway says...
8:35pm Thu 19 May 11

So basically no change then, still at least the Waltham Forest Cinema Trust will have something to campaign about for the next ten years, rather then worry about where they are actually going to get 9.5 million should the UCKG ever decide to sell.

mdj says...
9:59pm Thu 19 May 11

Anyone interested in the background to the church may wish to view this clip:
UCKG begging and deceiving in London
uckgcult (You Tube)

Also,guardian.co.uk: Brazilian evangelical leader accused of fraud

Janet1 says...
11:06pm Thu 19 May 11

Funny about the UCKG's alleged "3000 local supporters".

Are they the ones I met at a demo outside the cinema a few years back, who claimed to live in Walthamstow, but when asked didn't know the names of any roads or landmarks in the area?

Or the ones who all gave an address in Walthamstow - about 40 of them at the same house!

No wonder there were so many coaches parked just round the corner from the pubic inquiry in 2003. Any farther away and these "local" people would have got lost on their way to the getaway vehicles.

Redfox says...
11:38pm Thu 19 May 11

I want to know when somebody is going to challenge the SHODDY attitude of council's long-serving conservation officer who has done absolutely SFA to ensure his annual reports to English Heritage are made public, why no report of the rave and theft and damage of artifacts was made public in 2005, why he took no enforcement action about the deterioration of the canopy when bits first started falling off in 2006, and why, since following wind damage in February this year he has still taken no action to ensure 6 missing roof panels are replaced. I haven't even heard the Cleveland Park Avenue activist speak about that ! Can't anybody else see the damage - doesn't anybody look up at the roof as you approach from the High Street?

Sam Hain says...
11:54pm Thu 19 May 11

The Church Militant? More like the Church Impotent!

Jeremy_Griffiths says...
1:06am Fri 20 May 11

The Stowaway wrote:
So basically no change then, still at least the Waltham Forest Cinema Trust will have something to campaign about for the next ten years, rather then worry about where they are actually going to get 9.5 million should the UCKG ever decide to sell.
If you looked at the Trust's website you'll see they have a credible plan and a credible board of directors. I believe they already have cast iron pledges totalling a a high proportion of that sum . The situation is significantly different now and what we need is for the community to pull together on this, not make sarcy comments about the brilliant campaign that has endured all these years.

VillageIdiot69 says...
10:03am Fri 20 May 11

Jeremy_Griffiths wrote:
The Stowaway wrote:
So basically no change then, still at least the Waltham Forest Cinema Trust will have something to campaign about for the next ten years, rather then worry about where they are actually going to get 9.5 million should the UCKG ever decide to sell.
If you looked at the Trust's website you'll see they have a credible plan and a credible board of directors. I believe they already have cast iron pledges totalling a a high proportion of that sum . The situation is significantly different now and what we need is for the community to pull together on this, not make sarcy comments about the brilliant campaign that has endured all these years.
I'm sorry Jeremy but "cast iron pledges" of funding are no where near as good as cash in the bank. These have a habit of turning into vague promises and then "I'm sorry, but we just haven't got the funds available" at later dates.

I still think the figure of £9.5 million is woefully short of what is actually required to completely refurbish the building. At a rough estimate, it will cost £2/3 million just to do the mechanical and electrical work up to current standards.

McTodd says...
11:32am Fri 20 May 11

The Stowaway, says...
8:35pm Thu 19 May 11
So basically no change then, still at least the Waltham Forest Cinema Trust will have something to campaign about for the next ten years, rather then worry about where they are actually going to get 9.5 million should the UCKG ever decide to sell.
--------------------
------
So you'd rather the UCKG keep it, even after all their bullying tactics?

JasonOMalley says...
4:02pm Fri 20 May 11

£9.5m really is not a lot of money. I'm sure it seems a lot to the average person but it is a drop in the ocean.

The link in the attached is only ONE of the hundreds of examples of where money could be attained from. Oh, and they have a mere £1.4bn at their disposal.

http://www.bis.gov.u
k/policies/economic-
development/regional
-growth-fund

The economic downturn hasn't affected sources of money in most cases, it has just changed where it comes from. Keep the faith

thecinemaisours says...
4:51pm Fri 20 May 11

Lets keep up the momentum and get a financial action plan now and bid for grants to capitalise on the fantastiv victory! maybe it is time to have a fresh approach and maybe new campaign manager may I suggest? bill has done a fine job but nobody is indispensible and new leadership could work wonders. I would like to have BH still in a front row (pardon the pun) position though.

Lets us all work hard to save the cinema and send the Church packing!

Morvern Calling says...
5:01pm Fri 20 May 11

Hi there, most of the people behind the Trust are new to the campaign and Bill is a Trustee:
http://walthamforest
cinematrust.com/peop
le.html
They have a solid business plan in place and commitments of funding from the Heritage Lottery and Curzon Cinemas to name a few so it is all hopeful and going in a brand new direction so worry not! If you want to help then contact us at hello@savewalthamsto
wcinema.org

thecinemaisours says...
5:09pm Fri 20 May 11

Morvern Calling wrote:
Hi there, most of the people behind the Trust are new to the campaign and Bill is a Trustee: http://walthamforest cinematrust.com/peop le.html They have a solid business plan in place and commitments of funding from the Heritage Lottery and Curzon Cinemas to name a few so it is all hopeful and going in a brand new direction so worry not! If you want to help then contact us at hello@savewalthamsto wcinema.org
Great, very impressive, well worth a look, great to see so many qualified people on board. Good to see BH still in the front of things as well.

marsdan says...
5:10pm Fri 20 May 11

Well Done to the High street councilors including cllr Hussain for standing up for the people of waltham forest and not giving in to this shody so could Church .

Jeremy_Griffiths says...
5:28pm Fri 20 May 11

In the past people have criticised the campaign for having no credible plan/alternative in place. They have now; what I'm asking the sceptics to do is acknowledge the efforts made by the newly-formed Trust - look at their website, the people they have involved and get behind it. They are professional and know what they are talking about re the cost projections.

thecinemaisours says...
10:35pm Fri 20 May 11

Jeremy_Griffiths wrote:
In the past people have criticised the campaign for having no credible plan/alternative in place. They have now; what I'm asking the sceptics to do is acknowledge the efforts made by the newly-formed Trust - look at their website, the people they have involved and get behind it. They are professional and know what they are talking about re the cost projections.
I agree an again say that having looked at the highly qualified experience of Members elected to the revamped Save our Cinema campaign, i have for the first time in months felt very confident that the cinema actually can be saved! I felt a little on the back foot as on paper the Church own it but after the unprecedented turn out on Wednesday of the Mcguffin's there is now a real prospect of the Councillors engaging brain, getting into top gear and forcing a Compulsory Purchase Order. even if it takes 20 years we know now that all is not lost and that with the newly formed Committee we can strive to achieve results where the likes of Loakes have let us down by throwing in the towell.

I had such a great day on Wednesday. I arrived early and had a wander around the Town Hall and saw the plaque of a V2 rocket within the foyer.

After our great victory I thought back to that plaque and felt that like we fought outsiders during WW2, we are in a sort of (local) way doing it again and in tribute to those victims of that V2 rocket all those years ago. Well done! let us continue to save our beautiful and fantastic building and brind down the church campaign!

sensibility says...
10:59pm Fri 20 May 11

I really do fear that by the time this is all sorted once and for all the building will be in such a state of disrepair that it will have to be demolished.

Sam Hain says...
8:03pm Sat 21 May 11

The Council has made a wise and wonderful decision in this case but now it needs to ride the wave of public approbbation and crank up the pressure on the building's owners, to wit: "If a local authority consider that a listed building is not being properly preserved they may serve on the owner a 'repairs notice' under Section 115 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971. This notice must specify the works which the authority consider reasonably necessary for the proper preservation of the building and explain that if it is not complied with within 2 months the authority may make a compulsory purchase order and submit it to the Secretary of State for confirmation. If the owner deliberately neglects the building in order to redevelop the site, the local authority may not only acquire the building, but may do so at a price which excludes the value of the site for redevelopment..." This is a Grade II* listed building and the council needs to act rigorously and vigorously as its guardian. Keep up a barrage of pressure on it from now on and the UCKG may eventually give up the fight and sell the building. Even if it takes another 8 years it will be worth it in the end.

cinemalover says...
7:45pm Tue 24 May 11

VillageIdiot69 wrote:
Jeremy_Griffiths wrote:
The Stowaway wrote: So basically no change then, still at least the Waltham Forest Cinema Trust will have something to campaign about for the next ten years, rather then worry about where they are actually going to get 9.5 million should the UCKG ever decide to sell.
If you looked at the Trust's website you'll see they have a credible plan and a credible board of directors. I believe they already have cast iron pledges totalling a a high proportion of that sum . The situation is significantly different now and what we need is for the community to pull together on this, not make sarcy comments about the brilliant campaign that has endured all these years.
I'm sorry Jeremy but "cast iron pledges" of funding are no where near as good as cash in the bank. These have a habit of turning into vague promises and then "I'm sorry, but we just haven't got the funds available" at later dates. I still think the figure of £9.5 million is woefully short of what is actually required to completely refurbish the building. At a rough estimate, it will cost £2/3 million just to do the mechanical and electrical work up to current standards.
Oh have you been in there recently? Wonder how you come up with those figures of £2/3million?

VillageIdiot69 says...
1:32pm Wed 25 May 11

No, I haven't been in there at all but I do work in the industry and have been involved in refurbishments of similar buildings in the past. I did say that it was a rough estimate as without a full site survey and knowing what the exact requirements are that's all it can be.

Local Businesses

Most popular