Waltham Forest News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


WALTHAM FOREST: Olympic campsites deals expected 'soon'

Ive Farm in Leyton Ive Farm in Leyton

A COMPANY director has said plans for temporary Olympic campsites at Ive Farm in Leyton and Sir George Monoux College in Walthamstow have nearly been finalised.

The Guardian revealed this week how the 'London Camping Company' was taking bookings for the two sites on its website before residents had even been informed of the proposals.

Now the firm's boss, Noel Doyle, has told the Guardian that neither contract has been signed but he expects them to be completed within weeks if not days.

The council, which owns Ive Farm, has failed to comment on the issue, while the college said it is "exploring" various options.

But Mr Doyle said the campsites had been planned for some months but the council did not want to let residents know about them until a planned official announcement later this month - after the contracts are due to be signed.

He said: "It was a genuine mistake that the website went live. We were expecting everything to be sorted by now. But we haven't had any bookings yet or started promoting it.

"We're still talking with George Monoux College but the idea for that site was just camping with refreshments. It will be similar at Ive Farm although a bit bigger, we think it'll have a capacity of around 2,000."

The news comes in the wake of outrage at a council deal to lease Low Hall Sports Ground in Walthamstow for use as a campsite, without consultation with residents.

Neighbours are particularly concerned about proposed live entertainment and bars at the site, which will hold around 5,000 campers.

Mr Doyle, who also runs the Touch of Class Marquees firm, was keen to distance his company from such plans.

He said: "It won't be anything like what's planned at Low Hall. We're not having any entertainment like they want, it will just be catering.

"I know the residents will be concerned if they have another festival on their back doorsteps but we've no plans for anything like that."

Mr Doyle also said the council told him it was planning on reinvesting some of the money from the deal to renovate facilities at Ive Farm's derelict athletics track.

The council previously said it signed the Low Hall contract to help pay the bill for its 'Big 6' events to celebrate the Olympics, which could end up costing it more than £1.5million.

But the authority said it was also due to sign another contract to meet the costs, and it is thought that money from this new apparently imminent campsite deal may also contribute.

A spokeswoman for Sir George Monoux College previously said: "We are investigating opportunities to become involved in the Games, but would like to reassure local residents that any contract we enter into will be well thought out to ensure it has minimal impact on the local community."

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Facebook

Comments(10)

Helen, Walthamstow says...
10:02am Thu 9 Feb 12

Mr Doyle may just get away with Ive Farm but I suspect he and the college will have a fight on their hands if they go ahead with trying to set up a camp there.

Silent Majority 2009 says...
11:38am Thu 9 Feb 12

Once again the council shows its total contempt for residents views - don't be surprised when the council wants something from the residents, inparticular safety and security issues around the Olympics, the residents won't be listening!!

mdj says...
11:45am Thu 9 Feb 12

'but the council did not want to let residents know about them until a planned official announcement later this month..'
So no change there, then! Sign the commitment, then tackle the practicalities, such as the licence. If any of us hired a builder to put up an extension before we got Planning Permission, we'd get clobbered.
Again, it's presumed that the lawful process of applying for (or objecting against) a licence can only have one outcome. How could they know that, I wonder?
Is it actually legal for a Council to undertake liabilities, as with Cooperative Events, before the funding has been found?

EastEndLass says...
1:20pm Thu 9 Feb 12

A genuine mistake that the website went live? Yes, a genuine mistake that someone else did the council's job of informing locals that this was happening on their doorstep - just like the Low Hall Ground fiasco!

Mr Omneo says...
3:51pm Thu 9 Feb 12

What I find particularly 'arrogant' with LBWF's handling of all these recent events is the way they know the legalities and choose to legally follow the letter of law but morally dis-regard both council tax payers in general and those residents who elected councillors to 'represent them'.

The grandly titled and no doubt remunerated "Director of the Public Realm" took great delight in stating planning permission was only required for Low hall Sports Ground if the site was to be used for more than 28 days, knowing this and no doubt knowing the problems a planning application would face they brazenly state it will only be in situ for "three and a half weeks" however I note their proviso that set-down time may be extended if adverse weather makes that deadline impractical.

As I don't expect hail and snow in August I can only imagine they'll complain we've had a bout of the 'wrong type of sunshine' which contractors can't deal with...

I'm sure they'll have ensure the same 'get out of jail free card' is used at Ive Farm

Nairn says...
5:16pm Thu 9 Feb 12

As the council has admitted ignoring it's own planning and licensing rules/legalities and processes due to the Olympics being 'exceptional' circumstances, presumably we too can ignore normal legalities for the period of the Olympics. No council tax payments from me then. If they take me to court, wonder if my defence that the Olympics are exceptional circumstances will avoid my being prosecuted? Oh no, silly me...one rule for one and another for us. Angry of Walthamstow

Mr Brittas says...
6:06pm Thu 9 Feb 12

You are all blaming the councillors, quite rightly as they vote the applications through. But they are only endorsing what has been recommended by the LBWF SMT who are supposed to be professional local government officials. Questions should be asked of the Chief Executive, Director, and Senior Managers of the sports and leisure faciliites who have agreed and recommended all this. They earn very high salaries and are accountable, but not sackable.

Nairn says...
6:19pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Oh yes Mr Brittas, we know that. The Director of Realm seems to be the main person involved in all these decisions. It is obvious that he has not carried out due diligence on the contracts...indeed, I wonder if he knows what it means!!

myopinioncounts says...
2:32pm Fri 10 Feb 12

I will be very surprised if the camp site at the Monoux College goes ahead. It is much too close to the Town Hall for THEIR comfort!

Walthamforest1993 says...
7:16pm Sat 11 Feb 12

Whoever made this decision deserves to be locked up in ive farm sports ground and not be allowed out ever again and maybe even get eaten by the foxes that live there

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree