High price of public toilets

East London and West Essex Guardian Series: High price of public toilets High price of public toilets

Patrick Smith’s letter urging the council to look again at public toilets conveniently omits to address the issue of funding. I wonder whether he has spent time reflecting on the fact his Lib Dem colleagues in the Coalition Government have imposed the harshest cuts that local authorities have ever been subjected to?

Whilst central government departments have been expected to make savings of around 8%, local councils have been forced to take some 28% out their budgets. For Waltham Forest this has meant £65 million of savings over the last four years, with significant savings still to be found.

While we deal with the consequences of these cuts and maintain important frontline services, Mr Smith presents ideas without providing any funding proposals, or the wider financial context.

So for the benefit of your readers, here’s the numbers.

The total annual cost of providing our traditional brick built (9 costing £460K pa) and automated toilets (5 costing £373K pa) was £833K. The total cost of providing 40 Community Toilets is £35K per annum. The opening hours, the spread across the borough and increased numbers of family changing facilities and accessible toilets is also significantly higher and much improved under the Community Toilet Scheme, than our previous provision. The Community Toilets are also offer warmer, safer and cleaner facilities that are regularly checked.

Mr Smith conveniently omits to explain in his letter how he would bridge this huge disparity in funding, as well as how he would deal with the ASB traditionally associated with public toilets such as graffiti, vandalism and criminality such as drug dealing.

Oh and the final shocking part of his letter Mr Smith states that the policy to close our brick built toilets was initiated in 2010; when only Albert Crescent has been closed since 2010- the last of our brick built toilets. The majority- 6- were closed under the watch of his Lib Dem colleague Bob Belam. My question to Mr Smith is, has he really thought this through, or is he just taking the P?

Councillor Clyde Loakes, Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Environment, Waltham Forest council

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:55pm Sun 12 Jan 14

mdj says...

Holding Council office seems to damage the memory cells regardless of party.
Mr Loakes forgets to tell us that the decision to close the loos was taken while he was Council Leader, long before any 'wicked Tory cuts' could be blamed for the decision.
Since Mr Loakes' leadership skills may be said to have caused the avoidable loss, wastage and possible theft of some £70 million of public money, in this Council and at the North London Waste Authority, one can have some sympathy for a government, whatever its own failings, for feeling that local government is unfit to trust with our precious funds.
The fact that it takes this council £37,000 a year to operate an automatic khazi, even by his own figures, makes their point.

But he does us all a favour for reminding us of his existence in a week when his close and trusted colleague Geoff Hammond has been jailed for theft from a religious charity.
Had he been stealing from this borough, would anybody have noticed?
Would Cllr Loakes like to explain by what rigorous selection process a thief is promoted to public office in the Labour Party?
Holding Council office seems to damage the memory cells regardless of party. Mr Loakes forgets to tell us that the decision to close the loos was taken while he was Council Leader, long before any 'wicked Tory cuts' could be blamed for the decision. Since Mr Loakes' leadership skills may be said to have caused the avoidable loss, wastage and possible theft of some £70 million of public money, in this Council and at the North London Waste Authority, one can have some sympathy for a government, whatever its own failings, for feeling that local government is unfit to trust with our precious funds. The fact that it takes this council £37,000 a year to operate an automatic khazi, even by his own figures, makes their point. But he does us all a favour for reminding us of his existence in a week when his close and trusted colleague Geoff Hammond has been jailed for theft from a religious charity. Had he been stealing from this borough, would anybody have noticed? Would Cllr Loakes like to explain by what rigorous selection process a thief is promoted to public office in the Labour Party? mdj

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree