Votes shows depth of feeling

East London and West Essex Guardian Series: Votes shows depth of feeling Votes shows depth of feeling

On behalf of all our candidates and activists, I'd like to thank all the residents of Waltham Forest who voted for the Trade Unionist & Socialist Coalition (TUSC) in the council elections last week. This number is way in excess of what we expected and shows the depth of feeling there is against the austerity forced upon us by the ConDem government and, unfortunately, the Labour council.

While Labour won a comfortable majority, they should not think that we are going away; far from it! We will continue to campaign against the cuts, for rent controls and the services working-class people deserve. To that end, we will be organising regular committee and public meetings, with the aim of standing in the general election next year and any other elections that are called. Anybody interested in joining our campaign can contact us at walthamforesttusc.com and leave a message.

Finally, can I thank the staff at the count for their heroic efforts in sorting the European and council elections' ballot papers and then counting, a task that took 16 and a half hours from close of polling to the final declaration? In my opinion, this is too long for the counting staff, the candidates and their supporters.

I understand that the problems were caused by a large influx of late postal votes and the council not being prepared enough for the huge increase in split voting, but I would urge LBWF to look at using extra staff and counting space particularly when there are double elections taking place.

Kevin Parslow Agent, Waltham Forest TUSC

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:06am Wed 28 May 14

mdj says...

'I understand that the problems were caused by a large influx of late postal votes..'

Uh-oh: can you tell us more?
I will never forget being at the last count, where only later did it become apparent that High St ward had had a turnout of 125%...

If the postal votes are distributed out of proportion to the seats as a whole,especially if they coincide with advantage for a single party, it will be time to have a closer look.
'I understand that the problems were caused by a large influx of late postal votes..' Uh-oh: can you tell us more? I will never forget being at the last count, where only later did it become apparent that High St ward had had a turnout of 125%... If the postal votes are distributed out of proportion to the seats as a whole,especially if they coincide with advantage for a single party, it will be time to have a closer look. mdj
  • Score: 0

4:19pm Wed 28 May 14

Kevin Parslow says...

I can only tell you that the council received a large number of postal votes on the day to its polling stations and the Town Hall. This is now legal under electoral law. I have no idea whether there was an imbalance towards any particular ward or wards.

Kevin Parslow
I can only tell you that the council received a large number of postal votes on the day to its polling stations and the Town Hall. This is now legal under electoral law. I have no idea whether there was an imbalance towards any particular ward or wards. Kevin Parslow Kevin Parslow
  • Score: 1

5:11pm Thu 29 May 14

Kevin Parslow says...

I omitted to write that we got 5,482 votes in the Borough. Thanks again to all who voted for TUSC
I omitted to write that we got 5,482 votes in the Borough. Thanks again to all who voted for TUSC Kevin Parslow
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree