Telford Homes hits back at claims by housing association that problems should not be happening in new building in South Woodford

Iain Duncan Smith, Joel Herga and Emma Best of the Church End Conservative Action Group, and residents of Queen Mary Gate question Circle 33

Iain Duncan Smith, Joel Herga and Emma Best of the Church End Conservative Action Group, and residents of Queen Mary Gate question Circle 33

First published in Your Local Areas
Last updated
East London and West Essex Guardian Series: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter, covering Leytonstone and Wanstead. Call me on 07824 530 127

A developer has denied claims by a housing association that there are structural faults at a landmark block of flats built just five years ago.

People living in Queen Mary Gate, off High Road in South Woodford, have complained of problems including a ceiling collapsing and widespread mould.

At a public meeting on Friday, a representative of housing association Circle 33, who refused to give her name, told residents there were “real issues” with the Blackberry Court block which should not be happening because they are new.

But developer Telford Homes said it found no structural issues during a recent investigation and blamed Circle 33 for failing to maintain the blocks.

Telford Homes group sales and marketing director, David Campbell, said: “Circle 33’s Blackberry Court, is a standalone block and does not form part of the wider Queen Mary’s Gate development.

“Whilst Telford Homes has no responsibility for the management of Circle 33’s property, following queries raised with us by several of their tenants, our customer service team investigated the matter and established there is no structural fault with the building.

"They have also advised Circle 33 on a number of occasions that relevant preventative maintenance measures were not being undertaken to the block in question, which is the source of the problems.

"Water ingress into the apartments is the result of a leaking rainwater pipe that we advised Circle 33 to repair some time ago, unfortunately these repairs still appear not to have been carried out.

"Poor management of any building will cause difficulties for residents and we sincerely hope Circle 33 will now undertake the outstanding works necessary to resolve resident issues.”

Circle 33 has been asked to respond to the claims.

It also refused to provide the names of its representatives who spoke at the public meeting with residents on Friday.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:35pm Wed 2 Apr 14

MorrisHickey says...

Whilst there might not be any structural faults that does not excuse the development of what is almost certainly a modern slum.
Whilst there might not be any structural faults that does not excuse the development of what is almost certainly a modern slum. MorrisHickey
  • Score: 0

12:47pm Wed 2 Apr 14

John Fish says...

MorrisHickey wrote:
Whilst there might not be any structural faults that does not excuse the development of what is almost certainly a modern slum.
Indeed, Morris (as expected of developers), but Redbridge planners failed to deal with this matter accordingly at planning stage. Telford in fact became a 'Development Partner' of Redbridge shortly after, and it would be interesting to see how this worked if someone cared to look into this under an FOI.............
[quote][p][bold]MorrisHickey[/bold] wrote: Whilst there might not be any structural faults that does not excuse the development of what is almost certainly a modern slum.[/p][/quote]Indeed, Morris (as expected of developers), but Redbridge planners failed to deal with this matter accordingly at planning stage. Telford in fact became a 'Development Partner' of Redbridge shortly after, and it would be interesting to see how this worked if someone cared to look into this under an FOI............. John Fish
  • Score: 0

2:18pm Wed 2 Apr 14

MorrisHickey says...

John Fish wrote:
MorrisHickey wrote:
Whilst there might not be any structural faults that does not excuse the development of what is almost certainly a modern slum.
Indeed, Morris (as expected of developers), but Redbridge planners failed to deal with this matter accordingly at planning stage. Telford in fact became a 'Development Partner' of Redbridge shortly after, and it would be interesting to see how this worked if someone cared to look into this under an FOI.............
"Redbridge Planners......" Yore avin' a larf!
[quote][p][bold]John Fish[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]MorrisHickey[/bold] wrote: Whilst there might not be any structural faults that does not excuse the development of what is almost certainly a modern slum.[/p][/quote]Indeed, Morris (as expected of developers), but Redbridge planners failed to deal with this matter accordingly at planning stage. Telford in fact became a 'Development Partner' of Redbridge shortly after, and it would be interesting to see how this worked if someone cared to look into this under an FOI.............[/p][/quote]"Redbridge Planners......" Yore avin' a larf! MorrisHickey
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree