Your Local Areas RSS Feed


WALTHAMSTOW: Residents win development battle

AN application to build a massive housing development has been refused by the planning commitee – to the delight of residents who packed into the town hall council chamber.

Hadley Homes had applied for permission to build 562 homes, four shops, a restaurant, a medical centre, a creche and an underground car park on land at Billet Works, the Kimberley Industrial Estate and Tyco Works, off Billet Road, Walthamstow.

Residents, particularly those living in nearby Kimberley Road, voiced concerns about the impact on parking and the height and scale of the development which would be seven storeys high in places.

Ann Carter, of nearby Kimberley Road, said: “Where is the consideration for the residents of Kimberley Road? the increase in traffic and air and noise pollution will affect our quality of life.”

Residents were also concerned about the potential for crime and anti-social behaviour in the proposed 361-space underground car park, a concern shared by the Met Police crime prevention adviser.

Speaking during the committee meeting on Tuesday, Cllr Marie Pye, cabinet member for housing, said she was concerned that only 32 per cent of the units in the development would have been affordable housing, when the council requires 40 per cent.

She also said that Hadley Homes had failed to form a partnership with a housing association.

Cllr Pye said: “At this stage I have no confidence affordable housing can be delivered.”

Cllr James O'Rourke, of the planning committee, said he was concerned that there was no guarantee of a commitment from the primary care trust to support a health centre, while several councillors voiced concern about the potential strain on the borough's already over-stretched local schools.

The scheme would also have broken the council's policy on density, at 539 units per hectare.

Andrew Southern, Hadley Homes property director, said both the Greater London Authority and the Commission for the Architecture and the Built Environment supported the scheme.

But councillors unanimously rejected the officers' recommendation to pass the scheme subject to conditions including a payment of £2.5m for improvements to the local area.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments(7)

Heartlysmum says...
8:05am Wed 14 Apr 10

Common sense, there must be an election coming up?

UKIP-local says...
8:58am Wed 14 Apr 10

Don't celebrate too soon. These refusals typically go to appeal and the developer wins.

This is because the government and regional development bodies have huge house building targets to meet.

We are forecast to have 70 million people in Britain within 15 years and they have to live somewhere. Romania has just given its passports to 1 million Moldovans, whose average income is about $1 per day, so their best way of improving their families' standard of living is ---- (you fill in the rest).

wfmywordmybond says...
10:13am Wed 14 Apr 10

UKIP-local wrote:
Don't celebrate too soon. These refusals typically go to appeal and the developer wins.

This is because the government and regional development bodies have huge house building targets to meet.

We are forecast to have 70 million people in Britain within 15 years and they have to live somewhere. Romania has just given its passports to 1 million Moldovans, whose average income is about $1 per day, so their best way of improving their families' standard of living is ---- (you fill in the rest).
Exactly the kind of hysteric and racist remark one would of expected of UKIP.

wfmywordmybond says...
10:13am Wed 14 Apr 10

UKIP-local wrote:
Don't celebrate too soon. These refusals typically go to appeal and the developer wins.

This is because the government and regional development bodies have huge house building targets to meet.

We are forecast to have 70 million people in Britain within 15 years and they have to live somewhere. Romania has just given its passports to 1 million Moldovans, whose average income is about $1 per day, so their best way of improving their families' standard of living is ---- (you fill in the rest).
Exactly the kind of hysteric and racist remark one would of expected of UKIP.

Heartlysmum says...
11:08am Wed 14 Apr 10

Nothing racist about that remark.

It's a fact. Typical defense play the race card.

devilsmojo says...
3:11pm Wed 14 Apr 10

"Exactly the kind of hysteric and racist remark one would of expected of UKIP."

Exactly the race card playing attempt at removing free speech expected from left wingers

Investigations says...
8:16pm Wed 14 Apr 10

This scheme is simply typical of much of the undesirable development foisted on to the British people by a government intent on temporarily solving its economic troubles by importing cheap labour from the less fortunate parts of the world and building lotsa squalid dwellings to house them! The main political parties have sadly all committed themselves to this stupidity and have shown their lack of faith in the future by fiddling their expenses and making every penny they can before the ship sinks! Not one existing MP deserves to be re-elected next month!

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree