Your Local Areas RSS Feed


WALTHAM FOREST: Fears raised over impact of academies

Campaigners Julia Brown, Rachel Eborall and Holly Smith outside Roger Ascham School earlier today. Campaigners Julia Brown, Rachel Eborall and Holly Smith outside Roger Ascham School earlier today.

A PLAN by three “outstanding” primary schools to become independent academies will have a devastating impact on education in Waltham Forest, campaigners have warned.

Roger Ascham Primary in Wigton Road, Walthamstow, Yardley Primary in Hawkwood Crescent, Chingford, and Hillyfield Primary in Higham Hill Road, Walthamstow, are hoping to opt out of local authority control.

The academy system was first launched by the former Labour government to involve the private sector in running struggling secondary schools, but education secretary Michael Gove recently invited all successful schools to apply for a change of status.

The Government says that the policy gives greater freedom to staff and cuts bureaucracy, but critics fear it will create a two-tier education system.

The Waltham Forest Anti-Academies Alliance has been formed by union activists, teachers and parents, who have pledged to fight the proposals locally.

Members leafleted parents outside Roger Ascham Primary on Monday.

Campaigner Rachel Eborall, 32, said any new academies would ultimately take money away from other schools in the area.

This is because currently a portion of every school’s budget pays for shared services

It is feared that if too many schools in the borough become academies, state-run schools will no longer be financially viable.

Ms Eborall said: “This will have an impact on all schools in the area. For example, most schools cannot afford their own educational psychologist, so instead they club together and pay to share one.

“But once the total amount of money for schools goes down things like that are under threat”.

Fellow protester Holly Smith, 39, added: “What this amounts to is the irreversible privatisation of schools. These buildings are public assets which will then become private assets.

“Parents may think if their child goes to an academy it won't affect them, but all the schools applying for this in Waltham Forest are primaries, so inevitably pupils will go on to secondary schools in the borough that have been damaged by the loss of money.”

But headteacher Matthew Hanks said the school could improve further if it was was granted academy status.

He said: “I think we would be better placed to provide quality provision for our pupils and value for money.

“A school cannot stop improving. Given the opportunity to improve the school further I think we should not turn our backs on that and think it through very thoroughly.”

Parents of pupils at the school who spoke to the Guardian were split on the issue.

Paula Allan, 38, who has twins at the school's nursery and a son at the school, said: “I'm not concerned about it.

“The school provides a good education and they do as much as they can for the kids, so I trust their judgement.”

But mum-of-three Naciye Gurcoglu, 42, said: “This is a good school already so I don't see why they should make changes like this.

“The teachers are good and everything seems fine to me, so they should carry on as things are.”

Highams Park School, which applied for academy status, has had its bid rejected.

Campaigners claim that this is because the school’s reported deficit of £350,000 is considered too high.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments(8)

Helen, Walthamstow says...
5:06pm Mon 6 Sep 10

As a matter of accuracy, if the governors have not yet decided, then the three primary schools have only "expressed an interest" in becoming academies, they have not applied.

Personally, I hope they never do.

As for Highams Park, if this secondary is really operating on a £350,000 deficit, I can't understand how it was judged outstanding, Ofsted usually froths at the mouth about poor financial management, even when offered a three-year plan to clear the deficit.

Sam Hain says...
5:33pm Mon 6 Sep 10

Don't worry, Helen, when this 'progressive' government returns the school leaving age to 13 and re-opens the workhouses, as in the halcyon Victorian/Edwardian era, all such problems will be solved at a stroke. Such a pity there are no chimneys or mines any more to send working class children up and down!

Techno2 says...
12:56am Tue 7 Sep 10

Sam Hain wrote:
Don't worry, Helen, when this 'progressive' government returns the school leaving age to 13 and re-opens the workhouses, as in the halcyon Victorian/Edwardian era, all such problems will be solved at a stroke. Such a pity there are no chimneys or mines any more to send working class children up and down!
They could all be signed up as 'volunteers' for the Great McDonald's Olympic PR scheme or take turns as 'interns' working for nothing.

Sam Hain says...
8:57am Tue 7 Sep 10

Yes, that's probably the latterday equivalent, Techno2!

Nicholas Gascoine says...
4:34pm Tue 7 Sep 10

The sooner there are NO schools in LEA control, the better!

AND selective higher education .....

Especially, if the LEA is like LBWF, only interested in brown enevelopes, and how incompetent they can be - an ANY field.

We can see how much LBWF value education, by the way they have treated the libraries, can't we?

Redfox says...
5:28pm Tue 7 Sep 10

Surely the comments regarding enrollment as 2012 'volunteers' is misguided?
Entrants will have to undergo a full CRB search (criminal records bureau), anyone with a mark against them will not be taken on. With such bad discipline throughout the borough, "disruptive" children (PC speak for downright unruly brats) sent to the BASIC's site in Chingford Hall and others etc, plus the general knife-welding gangs rife in Cathall Estate/Oliver Road/Beaumont Road/Priory Court et al, virtually eliminates all these future adult wastes-of-space from any meaningful contribution to society, never mind being able to speak courteously to visitors from across the World.

stevewhite says...
4:49pm Sun 12 Sep 10

Two things strike me about the contributions. Firstly, the head teacher seems certain that academy status will improve his school. How on earth can he know this? This is I suspect a mixture of wishful thinking and the mistaken belief that being awarded academy status is a reward for being outstanding- it is not!
Academy status is likely to cause real problems to the staff. This is because the majority of the school budget in primary schools is wages. In Roger Asham's case, probably around 90%. If they go for academy status, they will no longer have the support, yes support, of the council to allow them to run a deficit. This means that if the services they buy cost them more than they predict, and in my opinion they will, they will finish up in deficit. Without council support they will have to then make cuts and that will mean the most vulnerable staff first, followed by the teachers. The teachers will be powerless to stop this because they will automatically be outside the national agreements with different contracts.

No doubt the head teacher does not want this to happen and will give assurances that it won't. The problem is, that he will powerless to stop it from happening.

As for the contribution that conflated Libraries with education and came to a reactionary conclusion. Don't be daft! It will be a disaster if these schools become academies.

stevewhite says...
3:37pm Mon 13 Sep 10

Nicholas Gascoine wrote:
The sooner there are NO schools in LEA control, the better!

AND selective higher education .....

Especially, if the LEA is like LBWF, only interested in brown enevelopes, and how incompetent they can be - an ANY field.

We can see how much LBWF value education, by the way they have treated the libraries, can't we?
I felt so angered by this comment that I need to respond more fully.

This kind of argument was used in the borough before. It was argued that the council did not do a good enough job in providing an education service. So what happened? They bought in a company called Eduaction, who did such a good job that they lost their contract to VT -the arms manufacturer. Eduaction was in charge when hundreds of thousands of £s could not be accounted for. VT then took over some of the service. Is this better than before? Slightly, in my opinion, but probably not as good as if the council had kept it in the first place. There seems to be more evidence that we get "corruption" (which you seem to be implying) when private firms are involved. If they were not getting contracts then there would be nowhere for the brown envelopes to be passed to.

The libraries have been run down. I agree. However, that is not unique to Waltham Forest. They are underused I'm afraid. I wish they weren't, but they are. If they go altogether there will be problems in the area that they are removed from: the whole area will suffer. The problem with the libraries is that in a cash-starved borough, (blame the Tories for even more starvation) they are an easy target to go for. What is needed is a fight-back and a demonstration by the public that they are regarded as an important resource. I hope to see Nicholas Gascoine on the demonstration.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree