Your Local Areas RSS Feed


LEYTONSTONE: CCTV to deter rapists 'too costly'

LEYTONSTONE: CCTV to deter rapists 'too costly' LEYTONSTONE: CCTV to deter rapists 'too costly'

THE parents of a young woman who was viciously raped on a footbridge in Leytonstone have accused transport bosses of putting other women at risk by refusing to install CCTV at the scene.

Their 24-year-old daughter was attacked on the walkway over the A12 by Norman Road in the early hours of a Saturday morning, and police had initially hoped to use security footage to help catch the man responsible.

But it emerged that Transport for London (TfL), which maintains the bridge and is responsible for its security, did not have any cameras in the area.

The family, none of whom can be identified for legal reasons, bombareded TfL with phone calls, emails and letters to raise the issue but it took nearly two months for the organisation to respond.

And when they did, it told the family CCTV was not “cost effective”.

The police then since revealed to the parents that another woman was sexually assaulted on the next footbridge along just a month after the rape.

Her 52-year-old dad said: “I think it's clear that TfL just don't care.

“We contacted the council at first because we thought they were responsible for the bridge and they took it very seriously and responded very promptly. The police too have been tremendous and relentless in their determination to catch him, but TfL have been appalling.

“It says a lot about the organisation that it was only when we wrote to every senior manager and the mayor that they replied to us.”

In a letter to the family, TfL's Commissioner for Transport Peter Hendy, apologised and admitted that the failures to respond “had added to the deep distress suffered”.

But he said a previous review had concluded that CCTV “was not felt to be a cost effective and appropriate crime prevention measure for this location”.

The woman's mum, also 52, said: “They're effectively saying CCTV isn't cost effective to keep rapists off the streets.”

The father added: “Statistically rapists do strike again in areas they feel they can get away with it. Ultimately if they put CCTV there it won't cost them very much and it could stop another woman getting raped."

The family say they also want to warn other women in the area and have appealed for anyone with information to come forward.

The dad told the Guardian: “It's been very traumatic for our daughter and our family, and she's still in counselling now. It has changed everything for her.

“But she's also been remarkably resilient and doesn't want it to affect her for the rest of her life. I feel very privileged to be her father”.

The family added that they were very grateful to The Havens, a London-wide support group for victims of sexual attacks, for helping them through the ordeal.

A TfL spokesman said: “We were extremely sorry to hear about this incident and Transport Commissioner Peter Hendy has personally apologised to the family for the further distress caused by our delay in responding to them.

“TfL will cut back foliage around the Dyers Road footbridge as well as improve lighting to increase visibility.

“We are also in discussions with Walthamk Forest Council to allow TfL to remove and replace the opaque side panels from the stairs leading up to the footbridge.

“CCTV is not currently installed on the Dyer Road footbridges as to be an effective preventative tool the cameras would require 24/7 monitoring.

“TfL will install CCTV provided that Waltham Forest Council is able to financially and operationally support 24/7 monitoring, and the commissioner Peter Hendy is asking the leader of the borough to respond to this as soon as possible.”

The attack happened on Saturday, February 5 at around 4.30am.

Two men were arrested but released without charge in relation to the rape.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments(14)

Eppingforest1234 says...
3:00pm Wed 29 Jun 11

I think i'd feel safer crossing the A12 rather than those footbridges. They could not look any more intimidating. I think they should remove all the horrible plastic window things, and open it up (even if it means getting wet in the rain!). CCTV would also be a sensible thing to install.
My thoughts go out to the woman who was raped and her family. Maybe it could of been avoided if the footbridges were more open and had CCTV.

jef costello says...
3:39pm Wed 29 Jun 11

"We are also in discussions with Walthamk Forest Council to allow TfL to remove and replace the opaque side panels from the stairs leading up to the footbridge"

Why not remove all the panels? Those footbridges are like something from 1970s New York. They are a disgrace - and shame on TFL for their behaviour.

AvidLondonReader says...
4:04pm Wed 29 Jun 11

I think the plastic panel windows are there to stop the idiot yobs throwing things onto the road below.

jef costello says...
5:50pm Wed 29 Jun 11

If that's the case, how come there's nothing on the road bridge at Gainsboro' Road? There's definitely got to be an alternative to those grim tubes.

Sam Hain says...
11:01pm Wed 29 Jun 11

Sounds like a callous cost-benefit analysis to me. Isn't TfL one of Boris' 'family' of organisations? A stiff letter to the Mayor might be in order

AvidLondonReader says...
7:33am Thu 30 Jun 11

jef costello wrote:
If that's the case, how come there's nothing on the road bridge at Gainsboro' Road? There's definitely got to be an alternative to those grim tubes.
Because there's CCTV there!

everoptimistic says...
9:14am Thu 30 Jun 11

The footbridges were probably enclosed to stop feckless youths dropping bricks on the passing motorists. So once again the rights of motorists over the welfare of pedestrians.

ch815n says...
11:31am Thu 30 Jun 11

everoptimistic wrote:
The footbridges were probably enclosed to stop feckless youths dropping bricks on the passing motorists. So once again the rights of motorists over the welfare of pedestrians.
what about the welfare of motorists ? are they not allowed to have somebody think of their welfare, yes the bridge was probably enclosed to stop bricks etc being thrown from it and prevent injury/death, how dare they protect a scum of the earth motorist !! bit of a stupid comment you made there really, whether motorist or pedestrian its the welfare of a person(s)

Brisbane says...
5:21pm Thu 30 Jun 11

Why on earth claim this "puts women at risk", when men are much more likely to be the victims of crime?
Does a crime only matter if a woman is the victim?

Hex, E11 says...
2:37pm Fri 1 Jul 11

everoptimistic and ch815n - you're having an argument over things you've made up. Stop it.

As jef costello notes, the Gainsborough Road bridge is unenclosed. I'm going to have to disagree with AvidLondonReader, though, because I don't think the bridge has cameras. A quick look at Google Maps Street View seems to confirm this, but I'm happy to be proven wrong.

Either way, LBWF has been pushing TfL for years and years to do something about these footbridges and it is utterly disgraceful that they have not. Once again, TfL is shown to be putting the needs of pedestrians (and cyclists) last.

Hex, E11 says...
2:48pm Fri 1 Jul 11

I just noticed this that I didn't catch upon first reading - "We are also in discussions with Waltham Forest Council to allow TfL to remove and replace the opaque side panels from the stairs leading up to the footbridge."

From the stairs only?! ALL of them need to be removed! This is sickening penny-pinching at the expense of our safety.

Hex, E11 says...
2:55pm Fri 1 Jul 11

Brisbane wrote:
Why on earth claim this "puts women at risk", when men are much more likely to be the victims of crime?
Does a crime only matter if a woman is the victim?
Hello? Ever heard of sentence context? The first sentence, which you incorrectly quote, is about rape. You could read it as ending "putting other women at risk ", but that's unnecessary.

Except given that some people clearly have issues with reading comprehension, maybe it's not. Sigh.

Hex, E11 says...
2:58pm Fri 1 Jul 11

Oh wow. This dimwit commenting system elided the last two words that I put in the quote because I used square brackets. WTF, Guardian?

That should have read "putting other women at risk (of rape)".

G_Whiz says...
1:30pm Sat 2 Jul 11

Still, this should please the no to cctv lefties. Left wingers and rapists are celebrating this week big time... And heaven forbid if DNA is even mentioned!

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree