Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting WFNEWS to 80360, or email us
12:19pm Wednesday 29th June 2011 in Your Local Areas By Daniel Binns
THE parents of a young woman who was viciously raped on a footbridge in Leytonstone have accused transport bosses of putting other women at risk by refusing to install CCTV at the scene.
Their 24-year-old daughter was attacked on the walkway over the A12 by Norman Road in the early hours of a Saturday morning, and police had initially hoped to use security footage to help catch the man responsible.
But it emerged that Transport for London (TfL), which maintains the bridge and is responsible for its security, did not have any cameras in the area.
The family, none of whom can be identified for legal reasons, bombareded TfL with phone calls, emails and letters to raise the issue but it took nearly two months for the organisation to respond.
And when they did, it told the family CCTV was not “cost effective”.
The police then since revealed to the parents that another woman was sexually assaulted on the next footbridge along just a month after the rape.
Her 52-year-old dad said: “I think it's clear that TfL just don't care.
“We contacted the council at first because we thought they were responsible for the bridge and they took it very seriously and responded very promptly. The police too have been tremendous and relentless in their determination to catch him, but TfL have been appalling.
“It says a lot about the organisation that it was only when we wrote to every senior manager and the mayor that they replied to us.”
In a letter to the family, TfL's Commissioner for Transport Peter Hendy, apologised and admitted that the failures to respond “had added to the deep distress suffered”.
But he said a previous review had concluded that CCTV “was not felt to be a cost effective and appropriate crime prevention measure for this location”.
The woman's mum, also 52, said: “They're effectively saying CCTV isn't cost effective to keep rapists off the streets.”
The father added: “Statistically rapists do strike again in areas they feel they can get away with it. Ultimately if they put CCTV there it won't cost them very much and it could stop another woman getting raped."
The family say they also want to warn other women in the area and have appealed for anyone with information to come forward.
The dad told the Guardian: “It's been very traumatic for our daughter and our family, and she's still in counselling now. It has changed everything for her.
“But she's also been remarkably resilient and doesn't want it to affect her for the rest of her life. I feel very privileged to be her father”.
The family added that they were very grateful to The Havens, a London-wide support group for victims of sexual attacks, for helping them through the ordeal.
A TfL spokesman said: “We were extremely sorry to hear about this incident and Transport Commissioner Peter Hendy has personally apologised to the family for the further distress caused by our delay in responding to them.
“TfL will cut back foliage around the Dyers Road footbridge as well as improve lighting to increase visibility.
“We are also in discussions with Walthamk Forest Council to allow TfL to remove and replace the opaque side panels from the stairs leading up to the footbridge.
“CCTV is not currently installed on the Dyer Road footbridges as to be an effective preventative tool the cameras would require 24/7 monitoring.
“TfL will install CCTV provided that Waltham Forest Council is able to financially and operationally support 24/7 monitoring, and the commissioner Peter Hendy is asking the leader of the borough to respond to this as soon as possible.”
The attack happened on Saturday, February 5 at around 4.30am.
Two men were arrested but released without charge in relation to the rape.
Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter
Comments(14)
jef costello
says...
3:39pm Wed 29 Jun 11
AvidLondonReader
says...
4:04pm Wed 29 Jun 11
jef costello
says...
5:50pm Wed 29 Jun 11
Sam Hain
says...
11:01pm Wed 29 Jun 11
AvidLondonReader
says...
7:33am Thu 30 Jun 11
jef costello wrote:Because there's CCTV there!
If that's the case, how come there's nothing on the road bridge at Gainsboro' Road? There's definitely got to be an alternative to those grim tubes.
everoptimistic
says...
9:14am Thu 30 Jun 11
ch815n
says...
11:31am Thu 30 Jun 11
everoptimistic wrote:what about the welfare of motorists ? are they not allowed to have somebody think of their welfare, yes the bridge was probably enclosed to stop bricks etc being thrown from it and prevent injury/death, how dare they protect a scum of the earth motorist !! bit of a stupid comment you made there really, whether motorist or pedestrian its the welfare of a person(s)
The footbridges were probably enclosed to stop feckless youths dropping bricks on the passing motorists. So once again the rights of motorists over the welfare of pedestrians.
Brisbane
says...
5:21pm Thu 30 Jun 11
Hex, E11
says...
2:37pm Fri 1 Jul 11
Hex, E11
says...
2:48pm Fri 1 Jul 11
Hex, E11
says...
2:55pm Fri 1 Jul 11
Brisbane wrote:Hello? Ever heard of sentence context? The first sentence, which you incorrectly quote, is about rape. You could read it as ending "putting other women at risk ", but that's unnecessary.
Why on earth claim this "puts women at risk", when men are much more likely to be the victims of crime?
Does a crime only matter if a woman is the victim?
Hex, E11
says...
2:58pm Fri 1 Jul 11
G_Whiz
says...
1:30pm Sat 2 Jul 11
Need a change? Search thousands of jobs locally and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find friendship and romance online with Two’s Company
Search Now »
Tens of thousands of houses and flats for sale and rent.
Search Now »
Every major make and model, thousands of options to choose from.
Search Now »
Eppingforest1234 says...
3:00pm Wed 29 Jun 11
My thoughts go out to the woman who was raped and her family. Maybe it could of been avoided if the footbridges were more open and had CCTV.