Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting WFNEWS to 80360, or email us
5:01pm Friday 17th February 2012 in Your Local Areas By Daniel Binns
THE council's new budget has been revealed.
The authority's cabinet will meet this Tuesday (February 21) to review the weighty document before it goes to the full council for approval in time for the start of the next financial year in April.
Many of the measures, such as a programme to save £16million, were already approved last year as part of a strategy to save a total of £45.7million in 24 months.
But the council says an unprecedented cut in its own funding from central Government means that a further £20million of savings are needed in the years 2013/14 and 2014/15, so an extra £11.7 million of cuts for that period has also been sketched out.
The Waltham Forest Disability Resource Centre will have £160,000 wiped from its funding under the proposals, while the meals on wheels service will be trimmed by £90,000.
Other plans include reducing the amount spent on day support for those with learning disabilities by £500,000.
Most of the savings measures are lacking in detail. Last year's budget contained similarly vague proposals such as a cut in £1million from the library budget. That later led to the closure of two branches and a reduction in some opening hours.
Meanwhile the council's basic tax charge will remain frozen, while The Mayor of London has proposed that the Greater London Authority precept is reduced by £3.10 to £306.72.
An additional £1million in funding for school improvement works is proposed for the next two years, while council campaign areas are also allocated extra cash, such as its clean front garden push which gets £165,000.
A further £125,000 is earmarked for tackling unemployment, £350,000 for a pilot of weekly garden and food recycling collections and £100,000 for street parties in every ward during the Olympics.
The report says that freezing council tax is a high priority. It states: "The current economic climate is placing considerable pressure on our residents, and latest forecasts suggest that such pressures are likely to continue.
"In order to demonstrate that the council would wish to continue to support council tax payers and communities through the recession, the budget has been prepared on the basis of no increase in Council Tax."
The budget report also notes that £2.3million of next year's scheduled £16million worth of savings are at risk of not being delivered.
But it states that "the 2012/13 Revenue Budget proposals are, overall, robust and the adequacy of the proposed financial reserves are satisfactory."
Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter
Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Facebook
Comments(4)
Nairn
says...
9:57am Sat 18 Feb 12
legseleven
says...
4:04pm Sat 18 Feb 12
myopinioncounts
says...
4:53pm Mon 20 Feb 12
Need a change? Search thousands of jobs locally and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find friendship and romance online with Two’s Company
Search Now »
Tens of thousands of houses and flats for sale and rent.
Search Now »
Every major make and model, thousands of options to choose from.
Search Now »
mdj says...
5:58pm Fri 17 Feb 12
Let's look at a few items of financial prudence from the last few years:
£15 million of BNI money lost, wasted or stolen: certainly unaccounted for;
£5 million worth of land (when valued as a cemetery, it's intended purpose), given free of charge to the WF Muslim Burial trust;
£5 million handed over to Ascham Homes when they broke their own rules of consultation - money that should have been sued for from the directors, or Ascham's legal advisers;
£2-3 million handed over to O-Regen over several years, which then collapsed amid allegations of fraud;
£1 million at the very least in foregone rates from the Arcade Site, the prime site in the Borough, standing derelict for ten years;
£1.5 million committed without funding to lay on the Big6 Olympic events;
£350k to get rid of a Chief Executive against whom there was no lawful complaint;
£15k to bully a local businesswoman through the courts for recycling a cardboard box, as recommended by the N London Waste Authority, chaired by the man responsible for the bullying, who was 'disappointed' by her inevitable acquittal;
£600k transferred from other budgets to make up the shortfall in the budget for the Lloyd Park development, as foreseen by local residents;
Possibly £250k lost by giving a development site to a housing association, who then sold it on for their own profit;
Possibly £300,000 a year in rent for offices, while Council-owned offices stand empty;
That's £30 million without even looking anything up: would anyone else like to take over? I'm tired.