Our second part of the weekly round-up of hearings at Wycombe Magistrates' Court: 

March 9 

  • Tahir Tetlay, 32, of Walton Drive, High Wycombe. Driving whilst disqualified on Easton Street, High Wycombe, on December 31, 2019. Committed to prison for eight weeks suspended for 12 weeks. Costs £207. Driving record endorsed. Using a motor vehicle on a public road without third party insurance on Easton Street, High Wycombe, on December 31, 2019. Disqualified from driving for 18 months. 
  • Munir Hussain, 39, of Southfield Road, High Wycombe. Driving whilst disqualified on Micklefield Road, High Wycombe, on January 2, 2020. Community order made – carry out 50 hours of unpaid work within 12 months. Costs £175. Disqualified from driving for six months. 
    Read the first part of the court list again
  • Daniel Ryan, 22, of Kingshill Drive, High Wycombe. Criminal damage to property valued under £5,000 – at Tesco Express, Amersham Road, High Wycombe, on August 25, 2019, damaged a security barrier. Fined £100. Assault by beating at Tesco Express in Amersham Road, High Wycombe. Compensation £100. Costs £117. 
  • Fraser Gower, 25, of Birchdale, Gerrards Cross. Driving over the drink-drive limit on Candlemas Lane, Beaconsfield, on November 17, 2019. Fined £180. Costs £432. Disqualified from driving for 12 months. 
  • Christopher Hogan, 33, of Hawthorne Road, High Wycombe. Driving over the drink-drive limit in Hawthorne Road, High Wycombe, on February 13, 2020. Fined £369. Costs £121. Disqualified from driving for 16 months. 
  • Abdullah Sani, 26, of Bowerdean Road, High Wycombe. Driving over the drink-drive limit on London Road, High Wycombe, on February 24, 2020. Fined £205. Costs £117. Disqualified from driving for 16 months. Using a motor vehicle on a public road without third party insurance on London Road, High Wycombe. Fined £50. Driving record endorsed. Failing to comply with red light signals on London Road, High Wycombe. Fined £50. Driving record endorsed. 

It is established in the UK that court cases should be heard in public.

This principle of open justice is acclaimed on a number of grounds: as a safeguard against judicial error, deterrent to perjury, to assist the deterrent function of trials and to permit the revelation of matters of public interest.

Costs include victim surcharge and courts charges.