Waltham Forest News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


CHINGFORD: Toilet campaigners in sit-in protest threat


CAMPAIGNERS fighting to save the borough's last public toilet have threatened to stage a sit-in protest if the council presses ahead with its plan

Many residents have been outraged over the authority's decision to close the award-winning public conveniences in Albert Crescent, Chingford Mount, saying the facility is vital for shoppers, especially pensioners.

The council says it has been forced to close the toilet, which costs £90,000 a year to run, following a cut in central Government funding. But critics say the authority should save money elsewhere.

Protesters are hopeful they can force a last-minute u-turn when they confront councillors at a scrutiny meeting and cabinet meeting - where the decision is due to be formally rubber-stamped - later this month.

But they have said they would even consider direct action and have vowed to fight to the ‘bitter end’.

The council wants the public to use facilities in pubs, cafes and other private businesses instead, but campaigners have said many sections of society would feel uncomfortable doing so.

Yesterday a campaigning trio of Chingford mums - Doreen Woods, Patricia Brannagan, and Josephine O'Brien – handed in their petition containing 2,700 signatures of people against the shut-down to the Town Hall.

Mrs Woods, of Warwick Road, said: “We've had an awful lot of support for our petition.

“We've had pensioners taking it around their nursing homes and clubs, we've had bus drivers taking copies of it for their depots – 99 per cent of everyone we asked has signed it.

“We really hope we can get through to the council. Public opinion must count for something to them – or so it should.”

Josephine O'Brien, of Hampton Road, said: “The buses terminate there and all the drivers use the toilets. The council want people to use toilets in public houses instead but bus drivers are not allowed to go inside pubs with their uniforms on. They will have nowhere else to go.”

Mrs Brannagan, of Mayhew Close, said: “The toilets have only been there ten years and cost thousands of pounds to build. The council should stop wasting money on refurbishing the town hall and instead focus on what's really important to the people of Chingford.”

Mrs Woods added: “We're going to fight this to the end, we'll lie down in front of the bulldozers and we could even have a sit-in to stop this happening.”

Campaigners are urging their supporters to come to the authority's scrutiny committee meeting on Monday September 13 and the cabinet meeting on Tuesday September 14 (which is not on Wednesday as erroneously reported by council freesheet Waltham Forest News), both of which start at 7.30pm at the town hall.

The Guardian is awaiting a comment from the council. Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments(7)

Techno2 says...
12:24pm Fri 3 Sep 10

£800,000? A year?

Is that correct?

Techno2 says...
1:47pm Fri 3 Sep 10

Techno2 wrote:
£800,000? A year? Is that correct?
Thanks for correcting this. £90,000 still seems steep.

rubberneck says...
6:18pm Fri 3 Sep 10

This is all a waste of time and I cannot understand why they cannot do what most people do and go in a pub, buy a half a lager, have a number one or two and then go. Half the public loos were in a terrible state with richards all over the place and even people spying through drilled holes in the wall, scarey places to enjoy one of lifes pleasures, dumping and reading the paper

Bubbles66 says...
8:03pm Fri 3 Sep 10

Surely a sit DOWN protest would be more apt ?

avers says...
9:17am Sun 5 Sep 10

Public toilets play a vital role in everyday life. And closing them means literal disrespect for pensioners but also to pregnant ladies, sick ones. Was this approach somewhere consulted in medical establishments? Sometimes a person is ashamed of having a certain sickness. Closing toilets is a real disrespect if not harm. In Ukraine they also close toilets deliberately in order to look for one in a restaurant of cafee and spend more. www.ternoregion.com

blackandtan says...
11:50pm Thu 9 Sep 10

London Borough of Waltham Forest, 225,000 people, 1 toilet bowl.

Mark_uk says...
2:20pm Fri 10 Sep 10

I must say the council are fools and there could easily be a wealth of opportunities for the site the first thing which should be done is invite advertisers such as clear channel and jcdecaux and kfc I am sure they would love advertise there as their restaurant is tucked around the corner secondly how about a Vodafone mast at the site as Vodafone has poor reception in the mount, why not have TV screens inside the loos advertising local businesses in the area lastly auction the cleaning and maintenance contract to get the best possible price for the site surely the council could lower the 90k cost. I have emailed Vodafone's executive office and spoken to clear channel about the opportunities for the site the council should be marketing this site to its full potential and even make it profitable. protests won't help there should be a fresh approach and thinking towards public services funded by private investment.


Mrs Woods, Mrs O'Brien and Mrs Brannagan hand in their petition to Waltham Forest Council. Mrs Woods, Mrs O'Brien and Mrs Brannagan hand in their petition to Waltham Forest Council.

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses